PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L Vaur

Publications and source records attributed to L Vaur.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

[Epidemiology of myocardial infarction in France. Regional specificities].

A national epidemiological study undertaken in November 1995 recensed the data of 2563 patients admitted to 373 Intensive Care Units for acute myocardial infarction. There were 1827 men and 736 women with an average age of 67 years. Seventeen per cent of patients had left ventricular ejection fration (LVEF) < or = 35%. The mortality rate at 5 days was 7.7%. Clinical heart failure (Killip > 1) was observed in 34.4% of patients. 63% of patients were admitted before the 6th hour. Forty-six per cent of patients underwent early revascularisation by thrombolysis and/or angioplasty. The most widely used drugs in the first 5 days were heparin (96%), aspirin (89%), betablockers (65%), and angiotension converting enzyme inhibitors (46%). The influence of region on the demographical features, morbidity, mortality and therapeutic practice was studied. France was divided into 6 regions. In the Centre, the patients were older, with increased morbidity and mortality compared with the national average. Patients in the North East were similar and had a higher incidence of obesity. In the Ile de France, patients were generally younger with a higher incidence of tobacco consumption and their infarcts were generally less severe. Finally, in the South East, the mortality was particularly low. In multivariate analysis living in this region was good prognostic factor whereas low LVEF (< or = 35%) and age > or = 65 years were poor prognostic factors. This study, for the first time in France, describes the clinical features of myocardial infarction admitted to the Intensive Care Unit with respect to criteria of severity (LVEF, Killip) and region of origin of the patients. Its confirms large regional variations in the severity of acute myocardial infarction.

Adolescent↗

Home self blood pressure measurement in general practice. The SMART study. Self-measurement for the Assessment of the Response to Trandolapril.

The SMART study (Self-Measurement for the Assessment of the Response to Trandolapril) was performed in general practice and enrolled 1710 patients in order to assess on a large scale the feasibility and informative value of self-measurement of blood pressure at home (SMBP), define home blood pressure (BP) levels in comparison to office readings, and determine the number of home measurements necessary to provide an accurate and precise BP value. After a 2-week washout period, patients with office diastolic blood pressure within the range 95 to 119 mm Hg received 2 mg trandolapril once daily in the morning for 4 weeks. Four days of SMBP were performed both at the end of the washout period and the end of the treatment period, with an automatic printer-equipped oscillometric device (A&D UA751). The first day values were not analyzed. Thus, the maximum number of BP measurements obtained per patient and per period was 18. Four hundred and twenty-four patients (25%) did not perform any measurements. One thousand one hundred and nine patients (65%) performed at least 4 measurements. Among them, 619 (36%) correctly performed all 18 measurements. A preference for digits 0 and 5 was detected in physicians' measurements (three consecutive values, during a single office visit). This digit preference was not found with the semiautomatic device. When the number of measurements selected for analysis was increased from 1 to 18, in the 604 patients who provided all recordings and fullfilled all protocol criteria, the standard deviation of the mean BP of the cohort was reduced by 17% for SBP and by 23% for DBP. Eighty-five percent of this reduction was already achieved by six home measurements taken at random. BP was significantly lower at home than at the office by 13 +/- 15 mm Hg for systolic BP (SBP), and 8 +/- 10 mm Hg for diastolic BP (DBP). This difference was independent of age, more marked in women (P < .001 for SBP and P < .05 for DBP), and had a Gaussian distribution. Under treatment, office SBP/DBP decreased from 166.4 +/- 14.8/101.4 +/- 5.7 mm Hg to 144.7 +/- 14.2/86.1 +/- 8.3 mm Hg, while SMBP decreased from 153.2 +/- 17.8/93.8 +/- 10.1 mm Hg to 139.4 +/- 16.4/85.1 +/- 9.5 mm Hg (all P < .0001). A major aim in research studies and individual care is to reduce BP measurements variability. This study demonstrates the ability to evaluate baseline SMBP level in two-thirds of patients previously unfamiliar with the method, the ability to evaluate treatment effect in about one-half of the patients, the improvement in the measurement precision obtained with the repetition of measures (at least six home measurements), and the absence of bias of SMBP as compared to office measurements.

Adolescent↗

Errors in trough: peak ratio determinations induced by patient behaviour.

BACKGROUND: Trough: peak ratio is often used to evaluate the duration of antihypertensive action. Whatever the method of measurement chosen, trough effect has to be measured 24 h after the last drug intake for a once daily regimen. Peak effect is usually measured 4-6 h after drug intake. If patients' compliance to therapeutic instructions is perfect, then the 'intrinsic' trough: peak ratio of the drug is equal to the measured trough: peak ratio. Some patients do not follow these instructions, leading to biases in the evaluation of the ratio. For trough evaluation, all patients (N) are supposed to take the last dose of the drug the day before blood pressure measurement. However, if some patients (n1) wrongly take the drug in the morning of the visit, they will be evaluated at peak (type A error). For peak evaluation, all patients (N) are supposed to take the drug a few hours before blood pressure measurement. If some patients (n2) miss their morning dose, they will be evaluated at trough (type B error). METHODS: In the MACH 1 study, the use of an electronic pill count monitor allowed us to quantify n1/N and n2/N. A total of 452 hypertensive patients were randomly assigned to two groups. Patients in group 1 received written instructions to take their last dose during the morning of the day before the visit, whereas patients of group 2 had to take their last dose on the morning of the visit. RESULTS: Electronic pill-box recording revealed that 32.9%: of patients in group 1 committed type A error, whereas 27.7% of patients in group 2 committed type B error. The resulting 'pill-box corrected' trough: peak ratio was lower (87.5% for diastolic blood pressure and 93.1% for systolic blood pressure) than the uncorrected trough: peak ratio (95.2% for diastolic blood pressure and 96.0% for systolic blood pressure) of the population. CONCLUSION: The random behaviour of patients, with respect to treatment compliance, results in a systematic overestimation of the measured trough: peak ratio. The computation of this ratio may be optimized by improving patient compliance. Alternatively, only data from a patient subpopulation that complies with the therapeutic protocol, as reported by readings from electronic pill boxes, should be taken into account for its calculation.

Journal Article↗

Benefits of electronic pillboxes in evaluating treatment compliance of patients with mild to moderate hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to assess the compliance of hypertensive patients with a once-daily regimen of the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor trandolapril and to evaluate the antihypertensive efficacy of the drug in relation to the time interval between taking the final dose and measuring the blood pressure (BP). DESIGN: After a 2-week wash-out period, hypertensive patients, recruited by cardiologists, received trandolapril 2 mg once daily in the morning for 4 weeks. METHODS: In order to assess compliance, each patient's supply of trandolapril capsules was presented in a pillbox that incorporated in its lid a microprocessor that recorded the date and time of each occasion that it was opened. BP was measured using validated semi-automatic devices, at the end of both the wash-out and the treatment period. RESULTS: A total of 590 patients entered the study. Compliance data were evaluable for 501 patients. Overall compliance, defined as the ratio of the number of openings recorded to the number of doses prescribed was less than 80, 80-100, and more than 100% in 17, 63 and 20% of patients, respectively. The average number (+/- SD) of missed doses was 4.5 +/- 8 (median 2). The average interval between successive openings was 25 h 07 min mean +/- 13 h (median 24 h). The average number of delayed doses (a delayed dose being defined as the box being opened 25-36 h after the previous occasion) was 5.6 +/- 3 (median 6). Patients living in the Paris area had more forgotten and delayed doses than those living in the provinces (7.9 versus 3.8 forgotten; P<0.0001 and 6.3 versus 5.5 delayed; P<0.005). Doses were forgotten and delayed more often during weekends than on weekdays. The greatest number of delayed doses occurred in those patients under 60 years of age (6.0 versus 5.2; P<0.01). Decreases in systolic blood pressure (SBP and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were 20.3/12.8 mmHg, for patients whose final drug was taken on the same day as the BP measurement, and 18.9/11.2 mmHg for patients whose final dose was taken on the previous day. CONCLUSIONS: Electronic compliance monitoring allows refined analysis of the behaviour of hypertensive patients. In this study doses were missed and delayed frequently during the first month of treatment, depending on the patient's lifestyle.

Adolescent↗

Antihypertensive effects of trandolapril and nitrendipine in the elderly: a controlled trial with special emphasis on time effect profiles.

The aim of this double-blind randomized study was to compare the antihypertensive effects of trandolapril and nitrendipine in the elderly. After a 2-week placebo period, patients received either trandolapril 0.5 mg or nitrendipine 10 mg, once daily for 15 days. At the end of this period, according to a forced titration, the dose was increased to 2 mg of trandolapril or 20 mg of nitrendipine once daily for 2 months. Seventy-three hypertensive patients, aged 65 and over, entered the study. Demographic data and initial blood pressure (BP) level were comparable in the two groups. The antihypertensive effect, measured with a mercury sphygmomanometer, was assessed in 64 patients: SBP decreased by 18.6 +/- 12.1 mm Hg in the trandolapril (P < 0.001) and by 21.0 +/- 13.7 mm Hg in the nitrendipine group (P < 0.001); DBP decreased by 13.4 +/- 8.5 mm Hg in the trandolapril group (P < 0.001) and by 15.4 +/-8.2 mm Hg in the nitrendipine group (P < 0.001). No statistically significant difference was seen between the two treatment groups. A sub-group of 42 patients were evaluated by 24 h ambulatory BP monitoring. Mean 24 h ambulatory SBP/DBP decreases were 6.6 +/- 18.0/8.4 +/- 8.5 mm Hg in the trandolapril group (P < 0.001) and 5.7 +/- 11.1/7.2 +/-9.6 mm Hg in the nitrendipine group (P < 0.001). The differences between the two treatment groups were not statistically significant. The antihypertensive action of trandolapril was sustained throughout the 24 h period with a trough-to-peak ratio of 70.2% for SBP and 70.9% for DBP. Nitrendipine exerted its action mainly during the day, with a very modest antihypertensive effect during the night and early morning; its trough/peak ratio was 25.9% for SBP and 28% for DBP. The tolerance of both treatments were good; seven patients were withdrawn from the trial for adverse events (four in the nitrendipine group, three in the trandolapril group).

Aged↗

Assessment of drug efficacy using home self-blood pressure measurement: the SMART study. Self Measurement for the Assessment of the Response to Trandolapril.

UNLABELLED: The SMART study (Self Measurement for the Assessment of the Response to Trandolapril) was a large scale trial conducted by general practitioners in order to assess the informative value of home self-measured blood pressure (BP) for the evaluation of therapeutic intervention. After a 2-week wash-out period, patients with office diastolic blood pressure (DBP) between 95 and 120 mm Hg received trandolapril, 2 mg once daily for 4 weeks. Four days of self-recorded BP were performed both at the end of the wash-out period and at the end of the treatment period with an automatic printerequipped device using the oscillometric method (A&D UA 751). Every day, a series of three consecutive measurements was planned in the morning before drug intake and repeated in the evening. A total of 1710 patients (946 men, 764 women) aged 56 +/- 11 entered the study. In the 816 patients who correctly performed self-measured blood pressure (SMBP) during both periods and followed the protocol schedule, office BP (SBP/DBP) decreased from 166.4 +/- 15/101.4 +/- 6 mm Hg to 144.7 +/- 14/86.1 +/- 8 mm Hg while SMBP decreased from 153 +/- 18/94 +/- 10 mm Hg to 139 +/- 16/85 +/- 10 mm Hg. A weak correlation was found between the two methods with regard to systolic (r = 0.47, P < 0.0001) and diastolic (r = 0.36, P < 0.0001) BP lowering. Individual response to therapy varied between the two methods: 633 patients (77.6%) exhibited at least a 10 mm Hg office DBP decrease while 493 (60.4%) presented at least a 6 mm Hg self measured DBP decrease in the evening; 65% of patients were considered as responders with both methods. The 24-h therapeutic coverage was assessed by the morning to evening BP decrease ratio (M/E ratio) which represents the ratio of the trough effect to the 12-h post dosing efficacy. Both population and individual M/E ratios ranged between 73% and 86% thus confirming the long duration of action of trandolapril. IN CONCLUSION: (1) discrepancies between office and self-measured BP evaluation of therapeutic response have been pointed out: agreement between the two methods is obtained in only 65% of patients, mainly due to intra-individual BP variability and recording conditions; and (2) self-measured BP could be a potential tool to explore the 24-h therapeutic coverage.

Adolescent↗

Differential effects of a missed dose of trandolapril and enalapril on blood pressure control in hypertensive patients.

A double blind randomised comparison of two angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors was made in a study in which ambulatory blood pressure was monitored over a steady-state dosage interval and the subsequent 24-h period, the latter being designed to mimic a missed dose of drug. The blood pressure responses on active therapy were compared to an identical recording made at the end of a 3-week placebo run in period. Eighty-eight essential hypertensives were treated with a morning dose of either trandolapril 2 mg or enalapril 20 mg. Mean systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were calculated on each of the following periods: daytime (8:31 a.m.-10:30 p.m.), nighttime (10:31 p.m.-6:30 a.m.), and early morning (6:31 a.m.-8:30 a.m.). Trough/peak was calculated for each group both on active treatment and after a missed dose. Twelve patients were excluded from analysis before opening the randomisation code because of inadequate ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) recordings. Demographic data, placebo-period office blood pressure, and ABPM recordings were not significantly different between the two groups. Both trandolapril and enalapril effectively reduced blood pressure over the 24-h period. Twenty four-hour ambulatory SBP and DBP decreased from 148 +/- 14/92 +/- 10 mm Hg to 135 +/- 14/83 +/- 10 mm Hg in the trandolapril group (p < 0.001). The same parameters decreased to a quite similar extent after enalapril, from 143 +/- 13/91 +/- 5 mm Hg to 133 +/- 15/83 +/- 8 mm Hg (p < 0.001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adolescent↗

[Evaluation of trandolapril alone or in combination with a calcium channel blocker in hypertensive patients over 60 years of age].

The efficacy and safety of trandolapril alone and in combination with a calcium channel blocker were evaluated in 13,147 hypertensive patients over 60 years old. Two patient groups were constituted. After a 2-week wash-out period, the patients in group I received monotherapy with trandolapril 2 mg/day for 4 weeks. Trandolapril was continued for another 4 weeks in responding patient, otherwise the dosage of trandolapril was doubled or another antihypertensive was added. Group 2, composed of patients previously treated with a calcium channel blocker with insufficient efficacy, was treated according to the same treatment regimen, but the calcium channel blocker was maintained throughout the study. 13,147 patients (group 1: 11,329 patients, group 2: 1,818 patients) with a mean age of 68 +/- 7 years were followed. After 4 weeks of treatment, the blood pressure measured by mercury sphygmomanometer decreased from 176 + 11/99 +/- 8 mmHg to 164 +/- 12/87 +/- 7 mmHg (p < 0.0001). This blood pressure fall was similar in group 1 (-22 +/- 12/-12 +/- 8 mmHg) and in group 2 (-21 +/- 11/-12 +/- 8 mmHg). In the pure systolic HT subgroup treated by trandolapril monotherapy, the antihypertensive effect predominantly affected the SBP (-23 +/- 12/- 4 +/- 6 mmHg). The antihypertensive effect was correlated with the initial blood pressure. In group 1, in the case of insufficient response to trandolapril monotherapy, the addition of a calcium channel blocker was the strategy which achieved the most marked antihypertensive effect (ANOVA, p < 0.0001). This bitherapy was more effective than the trandolapril+diuretic combination (-18 +/- 11/- 11 +/- 8 mmHg and -15 +/- 10/- 9 +/- 7 mmHg, respectively (p < 0.001). A total of 1,270 adverse events were reported by 996 patients (7.6%), leading to discontinuation of treatment in 372 patients (2.8%). The most frequent adverse effects were cough (2.8%), headache (0.8%), vertigo (0.8%) and nausea (0.5%). Only one minor equivalent of angioneurotic oedema was reported. In conclusion, trandolapril is effective and well tolerated in elderly hypertensive patients. In the case of pure systolic HTA, its action is essentially exerted on SBP. The combination of trandolapril+calcium channel blocker appears to be the most effective strategy in the case of incomplete blood pressure control by trandolapril alone.

Age Factors↗

[Behavior of patients with mild-to-moderate arterial hypertension in relation to their treatment. Contribution of an electronic pillbox].

The objective of the MACH1 study (MEMS for the Assessment of Compliance of Hypertensives) was to evaluate the real behaviour of patients in relation to antihypertensive treatment administered as a single daily dose. After a 2-week period during which no other antihypertensive was allowed to be administered, 590 patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension received 2 mg of trandolapril as a single daily dose in the morning between 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. for 4 weeks. Treatment was packaged in electronic pillboxes recording the date and time of each opening. Various profiles were distinguished on the basis of the individual chronograms for the 501 patients able to be analysed in terms of compliance, and as a function of the deviations observed in relation to the treatment regimen prescribed. One hundred and two patients (20%) omitted more than 20% of the prescribed doses, either consecutive doses or scattered throughout the month of treatment; these patients were referred to as "omitters". The other patients were classified according to the scatter of openings in relation to the mean time of the dose: 10 "metronome" patients (2%), 126 "regular" patients (25%), 221 "irregular" patients (44%) and 42 "anarchic" patients (8%). Irregularities of dose times were more frequent on public holidays than on week days and in patients living in Paris or the Paris region. "Metronome" patients were older than the overall patient population. The use of an electronic pillbox could allow the attending physician to more adequately adapt his therapeutic approach and management of specific problems of compliance observed in hypertensive patients.

Adolescent↗

Self-measurement of blood pressure at home to evaluate drug effects by the trough: peak ratio.

AIM: Studies were carried out to assess (1) the statistical and clinical meaning of the trough:peak ratio and (2) the value of self-measurement of blood pressure at home in monitoring the duration of action of antihypertensive drugs in individual patients and in groups of patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from previous single-blind trials in 44 individual patients were reanalysed. The trough:peak ratio was calculated from mean blood pressure values. RESULTS: There are two major limitations in using this method. (1) Estimates of the trough:peak ratio are biased by the inclusion of non-responders. These patients have the usual random variations in blood pressure, and small differences can result in a spuriously high trough:peak ratio which may lead to an overestimate of the actual ratio. (2) The standard deviation of the trough:peak ratio is large; for a given mean trough:peak ratio some patients have the required 24-h drug cover, whereas others do not. The large standard deviation is partly a result of statistical problems, since four different blood pressure values are used to calculate the ratio. It is therefore essential to increase the precision of the measurement to decrease the standard deviation. CONCLUSIONS: Self-measurement of blood pressure at home might be a useful and inexpensive way of estimating the trough:peak ratio. As repeated measurements of blood pressure can be carried out at home under standardized conditions, this method increases the precision of each measurement. It is possible, therefore, to calculate individual trough:peak ratios and the drug regimen (once or twice a day) can be individualized.

Antihypertensive Agents↗

[Action of trandolapril on the blood glucose balance and microalbuminuria in hypertensive diabetics].

The aim of this study was to evaluate the action of trandolapril on blood glucose control and microalbuminuria in mild to moderate hypertensive in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes. Sixty-seven patients, aged between 33 and 79, were enrolled. After a two week placebo run-in period, treatment with trandolapril as monotherapy was given for 3 months. The dose of trandolapril was adjusted between 1 and 4 mg/day according to antihypertensive response. Patients were assessed clinically and by laboratory investigations each month. Two patients were excluded from efficacy analysis because of major protocol deviations. Mean DBP fell, under the influence of treatment, from 101 +/- 5 mmHg to 82 +/- 7 mmHg (p < 0.0001) and mean SBP from 171 +/- 9 mmHg tp 147 +/- 11 mmHG (p < 0.0001). At three months, 54 patients (84%) had a DBP < or = 90 mmHg. Microalbuminuria decreased significantly (p = 0.03) during treatment. Microalbuminuria returned to normal in 11 of the 13 patients in whom the baseline value was above 21 micrograms/min and increased to above normal in 2 of the 26 patients who had a normal baseline value. Blood glycosylated hemoglobin, fructosamine, glucose and creatinine, and creatinine clearance remained stable. Plasma potassium rose slightly in 7 patients. Six adverse events were reported (4 coughs, 1 peripheral edema, 1 plantar mal perforans). One patient died from pulmonary embolism. In conclusion, trandolapril is an effective antihypertensive agent in hypertensive diabetics. Trandolapril causes a significant decrease in microalbuminuria and does not interfere with blood glucose control in these patients.

Aged↗

Accuracy and reproducibility of left ventricular mass measurement by subcostal M-mode echocardiography in hypertensive patients and professional bicyclists.

In some patients, left ventricular (LV) mass cannot be evaluated by M-mode echocardiography because the parasternal long-axis view is not available. The aim of this study was to determine whether the subcostal view obtained by M-mode echocardiography under 2-dimensional guidance allows accurate and reproducible LV mass determination. Using the cube formula, LV mass was calculated, from parasternal and subcostal views in 96 subjects: 73 hypertensives and 23 professional bicyclists, covering a wide range of LV dimensions. M-mode tracings were read by 2 experienced echocardiographers and the interobserver variability was evaluated. With use of the subcostal view, the interobserver reproducibility, expressed as observer 1-observer 2, was excellent: -0.3 +/- 1.3 mm for LV diastolic diameter, -0.1 +/- 1.0 mm for ventricular diastolic septal thickness, 0.2 +/- 0.6 mm for diastolic free wall thickness and 0.03 +/- 16.7 g for LV mass. In 96% of cases, the difference in LV mass between the 2 observers did not exceed 30 g. With use of the parasternal and subcostal approaches, LV mass was not statistically different (202.6 +/- 2.2 g and 206.5 +/- 2.0 g, respectively) and the difference was < 52 g (clinically significant threshold) in 91 of 96 cases. It is concluded that, using the cube formula, LV mass calculation based on the subcostal view was accurate and not statistically different from that provided by the usual parasternal approach.

Adult↗

[Efficacy and tolerability of sustained-release disopyramide in the treatment of cardiac arrhythmia. Results of a study with 593 patients].

In the context of an open multicentre study, 593 patients participated in the evaluation of sustained release disopyramide (*) in the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias. One hundred and seventy one (29%) had a ventricular arrhythmia, 382 (64%) a supraventricular arrhythmia and 40 (7%) an atrial and ventricular arrhythmia. Two hundred and seventy patients (46%) had underlying cardiac disease. Disopyramide was administered at the mean daily dose of 462 +/- 95 mg. The effectiveness of treatment was assessed after 3 and 6 months by Holter in the group treated for ventricular arrhythmias, the responder rate was 52.6% at three months and 58.1% at 6 months. It was significantly (p < 0.001) greater in the group treated for supraventricular arrhythmias (71.3% at 3 months and 82.1% at 6 months). The Holter responder rate in patients aged over 65 (70.5% at 6 months) was high and general and cardiac acceptability similar to that in younger patients. Adverse events led to the interruption of treatment in 8.2% of patients. Thus the effectiveness/acceptability ratio of SR disopyramide makes it entirely appropriate for the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias, even in the elderly.

Adult↗

[Efficacy and tolerance of disopyramide in arrhythmia associated with sinus node dysfunction].

The aim of this study was to assess the effect of delayed release Disopyramide 500 mg daily on sinus node function in 12 subjects with sinus node dysfunction and supraventricular and/or ventricular excitability. An ECG, Holter monitoring and electrophysiological studies of sinus node function with an oesophageal electrode were performed before and after 5 days treatment. The drug had to be discontinued in 1 patient because of urinary retention. The Disopyramide suppressed the clinical tachyarrhythmias in 8 out of the 11 subjects. The maximal sinus pause observed on Holter monitoring did not change significantly. It only increased in one subject. The mean sinus cycle length during electrophysiological study slightly decreased but there was a global increase in sinoatrial conduction time from 309 +/- 164 to 413 +/- 125 msec and of the corrected sinus mode recovery time from 470 +/- 168 to 605 +/- 303 msec. However, these changes were not significant. This study of delayed released Disopyramide shows a discordance between the tendency for sinus node function to deteriorate when assessed by electrophysiological studies and good clinical tolerance as assessed by Holter monitoring in the bradycardia-tachycardia syndrome.

Aged↗

[Quantitative analysis of systolic function of the right ventricule by Doppler echocardiography].

The recording of the velocity of tricuspid valve regurgitation by continuous wave Doppler enables the calculation of the instantaneous systolic pressure gradient between the right ventricle and right atrium. As right atrial pressure is relatively constant, the rate of acceleration of the regurgitant jet reflects the quality of the rise in pressure in the right ventricle in early diastole, and therefore right ventricular contractility. The authors studied 3 Doppler parameters of the rate of velocity increase of the tricuspid regurgitation; the maximum rate of acceleration (dV/dt max), the maximum derivative of the pressure (dP/dt max) and the mean rate of increase in pressure (T). The interobserver variability of these indices is low (r greater than 0.96); reproducibility is good in patients with sinus rhythm but mediocre in atrial fibrillation. The comparison of the Doppler indices with the right ventricular isotopic fraction in 26 patients with tricuspid regurgitation showed a good correlation (dV/dt max, r = 0.79, p less than 0.0001; dP/dt max, r = 0.69, p less than 0.0001; T, r = 0.60, p = 0.0012). These results show that right ventricular systolic function can be evaluated by continuous wave cardiac Doppler by recording the spectral envelope of tricuspid regurgitation.

Aged↗

[Study of valvular prostheses by Doppler echography].

Doppler echocardiography is a reliable non-invasive method of following up patients with prosthetic heart valves. Transthoracic M mode and two-dimensional echo allow evaluation of the movement of the mobile element of the prosthesis and of the size of the cardiac chambers. Doppler studies (transprosthetic pressure gradient, valve surface area, trans- and periprosthetic regurgitation) give an indication of the hemodynamic profile of the prosthesis. Transesophageal echocardiography is especially useful when there are abnormalities suggestive of prosthetic valve dysfunction (fever, systemic embolism, clinical symptoms, haemolysis...).

Aortic Valve↗

Simplified enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for specific antibodies to respiratory syncytial virus.

A simplified and reliable enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was applied to the detection of serum antibodies against respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). RSV-infected cells were fixed and dried on 96-well microtiter plates and kept at 4 degrees C. The titers of reference sera were determined by endpoint dilution. A linear relation was found between the titers and the logarithm of absorbance values of sera diluted to 1:1,000 (r = 0.93, P less than 0.001). Measurement of RSV antibodies was done by using a single serum dilution (1:1,000) in conjunction with a standard curve. A strong correlation was found between complement fixation and ELISA results (r = 0.89, P less than 0.001). In addition, the ELISA method exhibited higher titers and a greater sensitivity than did complement fixation, although the applicability of the assay is limited with positive serum samples of low titer.

Animals↗

[Evaluation of the effect of tobacco on trandolapril tolerance].

The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of smoking habits on safety of trandolapril assessed by interrogation and by visual analogue scales (VAS). A total of 3402 hypertensive smokers (> or = 1 cigarette/d for at least 6 months) and non-smokers (no smoking or ceased at least 6 months previously) received trandolapril 2 mg/d for 4 weeks. The safety profile of trandolapril was assessed by both interrogation and by VAS. The VAS completed by the patients at D0 and D28 explored the following symptoms: asthenia, nausea, cough, headaches and dizziness. A significant change in cough VAS was previously defined by an at least 19 mm change. VAS analysis was performed on 2840 patients (1296 smokers and 1544 non-smokers), mean age 59 +/- 12 years. Smokers and non-smokers were significantly different for age 56 +/- 12 years vs. 62 +/- 12 years, sex ratio 74 per cent males vs. 45 per cent, history of hypertension 4.5 +/- 6.1 years vs. 5.3 +/- 6.5 years and cough VAS score at D0 35 +/- 26 mm vs. 20 +/- 21 mm. In the total population, 214 adverse events were reported by 177 patients (5.2 per cent). The most frequent adverse events were a cough (2.1 per cent), bronchitis (0.6 per cent), headaches (0.5 per cent), rhinitis (0.4 per cent), nausea (0.4 per cent) and asthenia (0.3 per cent). Cough was reported by 23 smokers (1.5 per cent) and by 49 (2.6 per cent) non-smokers (p = 0.02). In the VAS population, 151 adverse events were reported by 130 patients, 47 smokers (3.6 per cent) and 83 non-smokers (5.4 per cent, p = 0.03). The difference between the two groups was mainly due to a cough: 15 smokers (1.2 per cent) reported a cough vs. 38 non-smokers (2.5 per cent, p = 0.01) and 77 smokers (5.9 per cent) presented a significant change of cough VAS score vs. 124 non-smokers (8.0 per cent, p = 0.03). In this large scale study, 1.9 per cent of patients treated with trandolapril exhibited a cough. Smokers were less likely to present a cough. Use of VAS confirmed this trend.

Adult↗