PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

L Waintraub

Publications and source records attributed to L Waintraub.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

[Depression in the aged: diagnosis and treatment].

DIAGNOSIS: Recently published research has provided new elements for longstanding questions concerning depression in the elderly. The wide differences in epidemiological data are largely due to differences in the population studied and age-related changes in lifestyle. The relative proportions of syndromic and infra-syndromic states of depression appear to be different in young adults and elderly adults. In addition, it has been demonstrated that non-specialized criteria cannot correctly identify depressive disorders in the elderly. Many different specific evaluation tools have been developed, but often the available instruments used are poorly adapted to the elderly. IN CLINICAL PRACTICE: Clinically, it is possible to distinguish between signs of depression, for example depressive states with a cognition dysfunction component and early phases of dementia, and normal manifestations of the aging process. Somatic signs lack specificity but rarely compromise diagnosis. Although the relationship between somatic signs and depression in the elderly is complex, our understanding is improving constantly. Unlike official taxonomies, certain authors describe geriatric depression as a nosologically distinct entity. TREATMENT: The probably underestimated need for treatment is directly related to prognosis. Treatment should include a psychotherapy component and a drug component. New better tolerated and less toxic antidepressors appear to be as effective as tricyclics and their derivatives. There is some concern however about side effects. Current research will determine whether they are as frequent as with the reference treatments. 10 ANTIDEPRESSORS: We discuss published data on 10 available antidepressors proposed for geriatric patients (viloxazine, mianserine, tianeptine, fluoxetine, moclobemide, paroxetine, citalopram, sertraline, minalcipran, venlafaxine).

Adult

Antidepressant efficacy in the treatment of dysthymia.

Although the existence of chronic depression has been recognized for a long time, their definition was too inaccurate to enable reliable studies concerning their treatment. Among the numerous diagnostic classes that patients with chronic depression were assigned to, neurotic depression was the most common one, and was often considered to be unresponsive to antidepressant medication. Since DSM-III introduced 'Dysthymic Disorder', a new research was developed on the efficacy of tricyclic antidepressants, MAOIs or new antidepressants, whose results reversed previous opinion on its unresponsiveness. However the interpretation of those studies are hampered by methodological problems, yet unresolved, pertaining to the difficulty to differentiate dysthymia and major depression, to the frequency of 'double-depression', the usual mildness of symptoms in dysthymia, and the need of long-term trials.

Antidepressive Agents

[Methods of psychometric evaluation in geriatrics. Choice of an instrument and its reliability criteria].

As evaluation of patients functioning has become the key-stone of geriatric practice, the appropriated choice of a measuring instrument is of great importance. This article reviews rules and guidelines for a general approach to the orientation of this choice as well as the criteria of reliability of the chosen instrument. Starting from the principle that there is no universal instrument, but only instruments which are more or less adapted to the various requirements, the general characteristics which determine this choice are examined and discussed one by one. They concern the purpose, the study population, the rater, the applications and the variables, the type of instrument and the validation works. The various forms of validity, reliability and sensitivity are listed and defined. These criteria of reliability apply essentially to psychometric instruments with quantitative criteria of measurement, but not to clinical tests which have a qualitative evaluation and which are widely used in neurology. In geriatrics, particular attention should be paid to instruments with a high and demonstrated "face validity".

Aged