PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Laoise M McNamara

Publications and source records attributed to Laoise M McNamara.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Bone remodelling algorithms incorporating both strain and microdamage stimuli.

Biomechanical theories to predict bone remodelling have used either mechanical strain or microdamage as the stimulus driving cellular responses. Even though experimental data have implicated both stimuli in bone cell regulation, a mechano-regulatory system incorporating both stimuli has not yet been proposed. In this paper, we test the hypothesis that bone remodelling may be regulated by signals due to both strain and microdamage. Four mechano-regulation algorithms are studied where the stimulus is: strain, damage, combined strain/damage, and either strain or damage with damage-adaptive remodelling prioritised when damage is above a critical level. Each algorithm is implemented with both bone lining cell (surface) sensors and osteocyte cell (internal) sensors. Each algorithm is applied to prediction of a bone multicellular unit (BMU) remodelling on the surface of a bone trabecula. It is predicted that a regulatory system capable of responding to changes in either strain or microdamage but which prioritises removal of damaged bone when damage is above a critical level, is the only one that provides a plausible prediction of BMU behaviour. A mechanism for this may be that, below a certain damage threshold, osteocyte processes can sense changes in strain and fluid flow but above the threshold damage interferes with the signalling mechanism, or causes osteocyte apoptosis so that a remodelling response occurs to remove the dead osteocytes.

Animals↗

Perforation of cancellous bone trabeculae by damage-stimulated remodelling at resorption pits: a computational analysis.

Loss of trabeculae in cancellous bone is often attributed to a general decline in the bone mass leading to fracture of the thin trabeculae. It has never been investigated whether trabecular perforation may have any other biomechanical mechanism. In this paper, an alternative hypothesis is proposed and tested using a computational model. Taking it as given that osteoclastic resorption is targeted to microdamage, it is hypothesised that the creation of a resorption cavity during normal bone remodelling could cause a stress-concentration in the bone tissue. If the resorption cavities were excessively deep, as is seen during osteoporosis, then this stress concentration may be sufficient to generate more microdamage so that osteoclasts "chase" newly formed damage leading to perforation. If this were true then we should find that, for a given trabecular thickness, there is a critical depth of resorption cavity such that smaller cavities refill whereas deeper cavities cause microdamage accumulation, continued osteoclast activity, and eventual trabecular perforation. Computer simulation is used to test this hypothesis. Using a remodelling stimulus calculated from both strain and damage and a simplified finite element model of a trabeculum with cavities of different sizes, it is predicted that such a critical depth of resorption cavity does indeed exist. Therefore we suggest that an increase in resorption depth relative to the thickness of trabeculae may be responsible for trabecular perforation during osteoporosis, rather than simply trabecular fracture due to insufficient strength.

Algorithms↗