PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Larry I Lipshultz

Publications and source records attributed to Larry I Lipshultz.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Varicocele: surgical techniques in 2005.

Varicocele is the most common diagnosis in men presenting to fertility clinics. Traditional indications for correction of varicocele include scrotal pain, testicular atrophy, and infertility without other apparent causes. Adolescent varicocele correction is indicated if pain or testicular growth retardation is present. Following varicocelectomy most studies report improved semen parameters, increased serum testosterone, improvement in functional sperm defects, and the return of motile sperm in selected azoospermic men. However, conflicting data exists on pregnancy and fertility outcomes. Consistent data supporting the effectiveness of repairing subclinical varicoceles is sparse. Most authors generally agree that the primary effect of varicoceles is on testicular temperature. Varicoceles are diagnosed primarily by physical examination. Radiographic assessments are helpful when physical examination is inconclusive or when further objective documentation of a patient's condition is necessary. Several surgical approaches to varicocelectomy exist, each with its own advantages and drawbacks. We prefer the inguinal approach to varicocelectomy, except when there is a history of previous inguinal surgery. In such cases, the subinguinal technique is employed. Routine use of an operating microscope and a micro Doppler probe affords easier identification of vessels and lymphatics. Varicocele remains the most surgically treatable form of male infertility. Knowing the correct techniques of diagnosis and surgical correction ensures the best chance of successful outcomes in terms of post-operative morbidity, improved semen parameters, and pregnancy rates.

Adolescent↗

Vasectomy reversal: new techniques and role in the era of intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

The growing popularity of vasectomy as a primary form of birth control has also created an increasing demand for vasectomy reversal (VR). The advent of IVF with intracytoplasmic sperm injection after sperm retrieval has given couples an alternative to traditional VR. Although VR remains the most cost-effective and natural way to conceive after vasectomy, competing interests and market pressures have encouraged the development of this assisted reproductive technique (ART). The success of VR is dependent on several variables. The length of time since vasectomy and an individual surgeon's experience appear to be the most significant factors and are equally important. The success of this procedure is highly contingent on adherence to strict surgical principles of creating a water-tight, tension-free anastomosis, along with the appropriate decision whether to perform either a vasovasostomy or epididymovasostomy at the time of VR.

Humans↗

IVF and ICSI in male infertility: update on outcomes, risks, and costs.

Assisted reproductive technology with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is becoming an international panacea for couples struggling with infertility. The increasing popularity of these techniques and the data generated has given us a better understanding of the efficacy, consequences and costs of these procedures. There still remain many unanswered questions and controversies surrounding the use of IVF and ICSI. Increased experience, better refinement of these techniques and clearer indications for IVF and ICSI will inevitably minimize the risks associated with this procedure.

Female↗

Treatment options for the infertile male with cancer.

The detrimental effects of cancer on male fertility are multifactorial and may be secondary to the disease process itself or to therapeutic interventions. Patients and their doctors need to be better informed about the options men with cancer have to preserve their fertility status. Sperm banking is a safe and effective means of storing sperm before chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or surgery. Advances in assisted reproductive techniques allow in vitro fertilization to occur with the injection of a single sperm into an egg (IVF-ICSI); consequently, the requirement for the amount of sperm needed from cryopreservation is minimal. Pregnancies have been achieved using IVF-ICSI with cryopreserved sperm from patients with a history of malignancy. Similarly, successful sperm retrieval using testicular sperm extraction combined with IVF-ICSI can be accomplished for men with nonobstructive azoospermia after chemotherapy. New techniques such as spermatogonial cell transplantation offer the potential to restore fertility in patients who have received radiation or chemotherapy.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

Herniorrhaphy with polypropylene mesh causing inguinal vasal obstruction: a preventable cause of obstructive azoospermia.

OBJECTIVE: To report a multiinstitutional experience of men presenting with infertility secondary to inguinal hernia repair using polypropylene mesh. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: An estimated 80% of inguinal hernia operations involve placement of a knitted polypropylene mesh to form a "tension-free" herniorrhaphy. The prosthetic mesh induces a chronic foreign-body fibroblastic response creating scar tissue that imparts strength to the floor and leads to fewer recurrences. However, little is known about the long-term effects of the polypropylene mesh on the vas deferens, especially with regard to fertility. METHODS: Eight institutions in the United States reported a total of 14 cases of azoospermia secondary to inguinal vasal obstruction related to previous polypropylene mesh herniorrhaphy. Patient characteristics and operative findings were forwarded to 1 center for tabulation of data. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 35.5 years with an average duration of infertility of 1.8 years. Mean number of years between urologic evaluation and herniorrhaphy was 6.3 years. Types of inguinal hernia repair previously performed were: open (10), laparoscopic (2), or both (2). Nine patients had bilateral obstruction and 5 patients had unilateral obstruction with contralateral testicular atrophy or epididymal obstruction. Surgical exploration revealed a dense fibroblastic response encompassing the polypropylene mesh with either trapped or obliterated vas in all patients. Surgical reconstruction was performed in 8 of 14 men (57%). CONCLUSION: Reconstruction to restore fertility can be difficult secondary to fibrotic reaction. Before undergoing polypropylene mesh herniorrhaphy, men, especially of young reproductive age or with a solitary testicle, need to be carefully advised of potential obstruction and compromise to future fertility.

Adult↗

Survey brings no surprises.

The findings gleaned from the 1,291 responses to a survey of American Society for Reproductive Medicine members offer no surprises. However, the responders might have been self-selected from among those most interested in the organization's "news and views."

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Male factor infertility: evaluation and management.

There is a male factor involved in up to half of all infertile couples. Potential etiologies in male factor infertility are many and require thorough evaluation for their accurate identification. A complete medical history in conjunction with a focused examination can allow for an appropriate choice of laboratory and imaging studies. The semen analysis is a crucial first step, but by no means is it sufficient to determine a specific etiology or dictate therapy. A systematic approach is necessary to help guide the work-up and rule out less likely causes. The etiologies discussed within this article are tremendously broad, and the prognosis for any given couple depends, in large part, on the etiology. Without a firm understanding of the genetics, anatomy, physiology, and complex interplay of the male reproductive system, the evaluation becomes an inefficient exercise that often fails to define the precise etiology. Couples with male factor infertility need a systematic approach with the efficiency of ultimate treatment determined largely by the physician's ability to identify the specific cause of the man's reproductive failure.

Humans↗

Androgen receptor gene polyglutamine length is associated with testicular histology in infertile patients.

PURPOSE: Androgens and a functioning androgen receptor are required for normal spermatogenesis. The androgen receptor gene (AR) has a repetitive DNA sequence in exon 1 that encodes a polyglutamine tract. Within the normal polymorphic range this (CAG)(n) tract length is inversely related to the transcriptional activity of the androgen receptor. In a prospective analysis we determined the association of AR (CAG)(n) tract length with testicular histology in infertile males. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Blood DNA from 70 severely infertile patients without obstruction who were undergoing testicular biopsy was amplified by polymerase chain reaction targeting the AR (CAG)(n) tract. A total of 37, 15 and 18 men presented with the Sertoli-cell-only syndrome, maturation arrest and hypospermatogenesis, respectively. Blood DNA from 55 fertile men served as the control. Polymerase chain reaction amplified DNA was direct sequenced using a genetic analyzer. RESULTS: Median CAG repeat length was 22 (range 17 to 33) in infertile patients and 21 (range 8 to 27) in controls (p = 0.009), including 22 (range 17 to 30) in patients with the Sertoli-cell-only syndrome, 22 (range 18 to 28) in those with maturation arrest and 23 (19 to 33) in those with hypospermatogenesis. Statistical significance was noted for the hypospermatogenesis versus control groups (p = 0.039) but not for the groups with the Sertoli-cell-only syndrome or maturation arrest versus the control group (p = 0.054 and 0.591, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Infertile males with testicular failure, particularly those with hypospermatogenesis, are more likely to have a longer androgen receptor polyglutamine tract than controls. Polymorphisms of the AR (CAG)(n) tract may contribute to spermatogenesis efficiency through a subtle modulatory effect on androgen receptor function.

Adult↗

Male factor infertility.

There is a male factor involved in up to half of all infertile couples. Potential causes of male factor infertility are many and require thorough evaluation for their accurate elucidation. A complete medical history in conjunction with a focused examination can allow for an appropriate choice of laboratory and imaging studies. The semen analysis is a crucial first step, but it is by no means sufficient to determine cause or dictate therapy. A systematic approach is necessary to help guide the evaluation and exclude less likely causes. The causes discussed within this article are broad, and the prognosis for any given couple depends, in large part, on the cause of the infertility. Without a firm understanding of the genetics, anatomy, physiology, and their interactions necessary to permit full functioning of the male reproductive system, the evaluation becomes an inefficient exercise that often fails to elucidate the precise cause of infertility. Treatment success relies not just on a clinical diagnosis but on a determination of the cause of the male factor infertility. Therefore, couples with a component of male factor infertility need a systematic evaluation directed at the male partner to maximize their reproductive potential.

Cryptorchidism↗

Safety and efficacy of vardenafil for the treatment of men with erectile dysfunction after radical retropubic prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: More than one-third of men may experience erectile dysfunction (ED) after nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. The efficacy and safety of vardenafil, a potent, selective, phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor, was assessed for the treatment of ED after radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this double-blind study 440 men with ED after nerve sparing radical prostatectomy were randomized to take placebo, or 10 or 20 mg vardenafil. Efficacy was measured after 12 weeks using the erectile function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function, diary questions measuring vaginal penetration and intercourse success rates, and a global assessment question (GAQ) on erection. RESULTS: Of the intent to treat population 70% had severe ED (erectile function less than 11) at baseline. After 12 weeks both vardenafil doses were significantly superior to placebo (p <0.0001) for all efficacy variables. Improved erections (based on GAQ) were reported by 65.2% and 59.4% of patients on 20 and 10 mg vardenafil, respectively, and by only 12.5% of patients on placebo (p <0.0001). Among men with bilateral neurovascular bundle sparing, positive GAQ responses were reported by 71.1% and 59.7% of patients on 20 and 10 mg vardenafil, respectively, versus 11.5% of those on placebo (p <0.0001). The average intercourse success rate per patient receiving 20 mg vardenafil was 74% in men with mild to moderate ED and 28% in men with severe ED, compared to 49% and 4% for placebo, respectively. Few adverse events were observed. They were generally mild to moderate headache, flushing and rhinitis. CONCLUSIONS: In men with severe ED after nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy, vardenafil significantly improved key indices of erectile function.

Double-Blind Method↗

Oncologists' attitudes and practices regarding banking sperm before cancer treatment.

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to survey oncologists in three different practice settings to determine their knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding referring patients to bank sperm before cancer treatment. METHODS: A postal survey about knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding banking sperm before cancer treatment was sent to 718 oncology staff physicians and fellows at two cancer centers and at sites in a Community Clinical Oncology Program. RESULTS: The return rate was 24% and did not differ by institution, oncologic specialty, or sex. Fellows were significantly more likely to participate (37%) than staff physicians (20%). Ninety-one percent of respondents agreed that sperm banking should be offered to all men at risk of infertility as a result of cancer treatment, but 48% either never bring up the topic or mention it to less than a quarter of eligible men. Neither greater knowledge about sperm banking nor seeing large numbers of eligible men yearly increased the likelihood of discussing the option. Barriers cited included lack of time for the discussion, perceived high cost, and lack of convenient facilities. Oncologists reported they would be less likely to offer sperm banking to men who were homosexual, HIV-positive, had a poor prognosis, or had aggressive tumors. Oncologists overestimated the costs of sperm banking and the number of samples needed to make cryopreservation worthwhile. CONCLUSION: Sperm banking should be offered as an option to all men at risk of infertility because of their cancer treatment. Clearer practice standards could help oncologists increase their knowledge about sperm banking and avoid dependence on biased patient selection criteria.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Knowledge and experience regarding cancer, infertility, and sperm banking in younger male survivors.

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to survey male patients aged 14 to 40 years at diagnosis and recently treated in two cancer centers to determine their knowledge, attitudes, and experiences regarding cancer-related infertility and sperm banking. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A postal survey about cancer-related infertility and sperm banking was offered to 904 men diagnosed with cancer within the previous 2 years. Eight percent opted out of the study. The others were sent the survey, with a cover letter stating elements of informed consent. RESULTS: Although the return rate was only 27%, yielding a sample of 201 men, responders did not differ significantly from nonresponders by institution, age, ethnicity, or cancer site. Overall, 51% of men wanted children in the future, including 77% of men who were childless at cancer diagnosis. Despite some anxieties about their own survival and risks to their children's health, men felt that the experience of cancer increased the value they placed on family closeness and would make them better parents. Only 60% of men recalled being informed about infertility as a side effect of cancer treatment, and just 51% had been offered sperm banking. Those who discussed infertility with their physicians had higher knowledge about cancer-related infertility and were significantly more likely to bank sperm. Only 24% of men banked sperm, including 37% of childless men. Lack of information was the most common reason for failing to bank sperm (25%). CONCLUSION: All men who are about to receive cancer treatment that could impair fertility should be counseled about such side effects and given adequate information to make an informed decision about banking sperm.

Adolescent↗

Primary testicular amyloidosis mimicking tumor in a cryptorchid testis.

We present a case of primary testicular amyloidosis mimicking tumor in a cryptorchid testis. Examination revealed the absence of a palpable testis in the left hemiscrotum. The laboratory evaluation showed azoospermia and a low testosterone level. The radiologic investigation demonstrated a heterogeneous left inguinal mass suspicious for tumor in a cryptorchid testis. After radical orchiectomy, the histologic evaluation revealed primary amyloidosis of the testis. The pathogenesis and clinical presentation of testicular amyloidosis are reviewed.

Amyloidosis↗

Common medications and drugs: how they affect male fertility.

Numerous drugs and medications have been shown to have adverse effects on male fertility, acting through diverse mechanisms. These drugs are summarized in Table 2. Mechanisms of impaired fertility include direct effects on germ cells or their supporting cells, effects on the delicately balanced HPG axis, effects on erectile or ejaculatory function, and effects on libido. In a thorough fertility evaluation of the male partner, the physician should determine what medication the patient is taking and his social habits involving alcohol consumption, tobacco, and recreational drug use. Most adverse effects from drugs and medications can be reversed by simply discontinuing the offending agents; however, in some instances, such as chemotherapeutic regimens, the medications cannot be discontinued, and pretreatment sperm cryopreservation remains critical. It is essential for urologists treating infertile men to be familiar with the more commonly encountered drugs and medications that may affect the potential for fertility.

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions↗

What the urologist should know about the female infertility evaluation.

As childbirth is delayed and divorce rates remain high, urologists will continue to see more and more infertile couples. It is imperative that urologists understand at least the basic aspects of the female evaluation. Fundamental information can be obtained from a simple, directed history. Risk factors for female infertility can be identified in a matter of minutes, and the reproductive endocrinologist can then carry out a complete female evaluation simultaneously with the male evaluation. Most female infertility problems can be classified as ovulatory, anatomic, or cervical. Signs of decreasing ovarian reserve with age can be ascertained easily with a history and perhaps the determination of a day-3 serum FSH level. Finally, a basic understanding of the female evaluation allows meaningful discourse between the urologist and the reproductive endocrinologist, leading to a more effective treatment plan for the infertile couple.

Adult↗

Comprehensive office evaluation in the new millennium.

The success of a comprehensive office-based evaluation of male-factor infertility depends on the physician's thorough understanding of risk assessment in the history, identification of pertinent physical examination findings, and correct assessment of laboratory data. Office-based ultrasonographic techniques have already increased the urologist's ability to visualize suspected anatomic abnormalities, and the use of functional tests of sperm has given greater depth to the limited, but essential, prognostic capabilities of the routine semen analysis.

Comprehensive Health Care↗