PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Larry W Moreland

Publications and source records attributed to Larry W Moreland.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Reduction of inflammatory biomarker response by abatacept in treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Abatacept, a soluble selective costimulation modulator, selectively modulates T cell activation via the CD80/CD86:CD28 costimulation pathway. Data from a Phase II trial showed efficacy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and inadequate response to methotrexate when treated with abatacept (10 mg/kg or 2 mg/kg). To determine the mechanism of action of abatacept, we analyzed changes in the serum levels of inflammatory biomarkers in the patients enrolled in this trial. RESULTS: Following 12 months' treatment, serum levels of interleukin 6 (IL-6), soluble IL-2 receptor, C-reactive protein, soluble E-selectin, and soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 were significantly lower in patients receiving abatacept 10 mg/kg versus placebo. Smaller reductions in tumor necrosis factor-a and rheumatoid factor were also observed in the abatacept 10 mg/kg group compared with the placebo group. Although there was no evidence for efficacy of the 2 mg/kg dose, small reductions in inflammatory biomarkers at this dosage support the biologic effect of this therapy. CONCLUSION: These findings reveal the antiinflammatory and immunomodulatory effects of abatacept in patients with RA, and are consistent with the concept that modulating T cell activation improves clinical signs and symptoms and inhibits the progression of structural damage. These data suggest that selective modulation of the CD80/CD86:CD28 pathway with abatacept may affect several inflammatory cell types and cytokines that are involved in the proinflammatory cascade.

Abatacept↗
PubMed2006

Effects of abatacept in patients with methotrexate-resistant active rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: The selective co-stimulation modulator abatacept demonstrated efficacy for treating rheumatoid arthritis in early clinical studies. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of abatacept in patients with persistent, active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate treatment. DESIGN: One-year, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (November 2002 to October 2004). SETTING: 116 centers worldwide. PATIENTS: 652 patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate treatment. INTERVENTION: Once-monthly infusion of a fixed dose of abatacept, approximately 10 mg/kg of body weight, or placebo. MEASUREMENTS: Co-primary end points were a 20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response criteria (ACR 20) at 6 months, clinically meaningful improvements in physical function, and change from baseline in joint erosion score at 1 year. RESULTS: Four hundred thirty-three and 219 patients were randomly assigned to abatacept or placebo, respectively, and 385 (89%) and 162 (74%), respectively, completed 1 year of treatment. In a modified intention-to-treat analysis, 6-month ACR 20, ACR 50, and ACR 70 responses were 67.9% for abatacept versus 39.7% for placebo (difference, 28.2 percentage points [95% CI, 19.8 to 36.7 percentage points]), 39.9% for abatacept versus 16.8% for placebo (difference, 23.0 percentage points [CI, 15.0 to 31.1 percentage points]), and 19.8% for abatacept versus 6.5% for placebo (difference, 13.3 percentage points [CI, 7.0 to 19.5 percentage points]), respectively. At 1 year, the responses increased to 73.1% for abatacept versus 39.7% for placebo (difference, 33.4 percentage points [CI, 25.1 to 41.7 percentage points]), 48.3% for abatacept versus 18.2% for placebo (difference, 30.1 percentage points [CI, 21.8 to 38.5 percentage points]), and 28.8% for abatacept versus 6.1% for placebo (difference, 22.7 percentage points [CI, 15.6 to 29.8 percentage points]), respectively (P < 0.001 for all). Physical function significantly improved in 63.7% versus 39.3% of patients (P < 0.001). At 1 year, abatacept statistically significantly slowed the progression of structural joint damage compared with placebo. Abatacept-treated patients had a similar incidence of adverse events (87.3% vs. 84.0%; difference, 3.3 percentage points [CI, -2.5 to 9.1 percentage points]) and a higher incidence of prespecified serious infections (2.5% vs. 0.9%; difference, 1.6 percentage points [CI, -0.3 to 3.6 percentage points]) and infusion reactions (acute, 8.8% vs. 4.1%; difference, 4.7 percentage points [CI, 0.9 to 8.4 percentage points]; peri-infusional, 24.5% vs. 16.9%; difference, 7.6 percentage points [CI, 1.2 to 14.0 percentage points]) compared with placebo recipients. LIMITATIONS: The study involved only 1 group of patients over 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Abatacept statistically significantly reduced disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate. Longer treatment in different patient populations is needed to establish its appropriate role in rheumatoid arthritis.

Abatacept↗
PubMed2006

Effect of etanercept on fatigue in patients with recent or established rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the long-term impact of etanercept on fatigue in patients with recent-onset (mean duration 11 months) or established (mean duration 12 years) rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Patients participating in either of 2 multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trials were included. In one trial, patients with recent-onset RA received either etanercept 25 mg twice weekly or methotrexate in a double-blind fashion for 12 months, then open label for 12 months. All patients then received open-label etanercept. In the second trial, patients with established RA received etanercept 25 mg or placebo twice weekly for 6 months in a double-blinded fashion, then open-label etanercept. Up to 46 months of followup data were included. Fatigue was measured regularly using the Health Assessment Questionnaire vitality domain. RESULTS: Patients with recent-onset RA who received etanercept had a significantly faster improvement in fatigue than those receiving methotrexate in the first 2 months. Subsequently, patients receiving etanercept and methotrexate had 23-29% and 17-24% reductions in fatigue scores, respectively. In the group with established RA, patients who received etanercept had significantly greater reductions in fatigue than those receiving placebo during the blinded period. Patients initially receiving etanercept sustained a mean fatigue reduction of 25-36% for the entire followup. Patients achieving clinically meaningful improvement in fatigue were more likely to meet the American College of Rheumatology improvement criteria. CONCLUSION: Etanercept therapy reduces fatigue in patients with recent-onset or established RA. Improvement in fatigue was sustained for up to 46 months, and correlated with other RA-relevant outcomes.

Antirheumatic Agents↗
PubMed2006

Etanercept treatment in adults with established rheumatoid arthritis: 7 years of clinical experience.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate safety and efficacy of longterm etanercept treatment in patients with disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) refractory rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Safety results are reported for 714 patients who received etanercept in one of 7 initial trials or a longterm extension. Efficacy results are reported for 581 patients who enrolled in the extension. RESULTS: Of the 714 patients enrolled in the initial trials, 581 (81%) enrolled in the extension, and 388 (54%) patients are continuing to receive etanercept therapy. The longest individual treatment was 8.2 years, with 3139 total patient-years of etanercept exposure. Rates of serious adverse events (overall rate=14.8 events/100 patient-yrs), serious infections (overall rate=4.2 events/100 patient-yrs), cancer (overall rate=1.0 events/100 patient-yrs), and deaths (overall rate=0.7 events/100 patient-yrs) were stable each year, through 8 years of etanercept exposure. For 356 patients who completed 6 years of etanercept treatment, response rates were ACR20=73%, ACR50=52%, ACR70=27%, DAS28 CRP good response=52%, and DAS28 CRP remission=37% of patients. Similar responses occurred in 167 patients who completed Year 7. Doses of concomitant methotrexate or corticosteroids were reduced in many patients who maintained clinical responses. CONCLUSION: The safety profile of etanercept was consistent over time, with rates of adverse events similar to those reported for patients with RA in general. Durable clinical responses were observed in some patients for 7 years or more. The benefit-to-risk ratio for longterm etanercept treatment remains highly favorable.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Glucosamine, chondroitin sulfate, and the two in combination for painful knee osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: Glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate are used to treat osteoarthritis. The multicenter, double-blind, placebo- and celecoxib-controlled Glucosamine/chondroitin Arthritis Intervention Trial (GAIT) evaluated their efficacy and safety as a treatment for knee pain from osteoarthritis. METHODS: We randomly assigned 1583 patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis to receive 1500 mg of glucosamine daily, 1200 mg of chondroitin sulfate daily, both glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate, 200 mg of celecoxib daily, or placebo for 24 weeks. Up to 4000 mg of acetaminophen daily was allowed as rescue analgesia. Assignment was stratified according to the severity of knee pain (mild [N=1229] vs. moderate to severe [N=354]). The primary outcome measure was a 20 percent decrease in knee pain from baseline to week 24. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 59 years, and 64 percent were women. Overall, glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate were not significantly better than placebo in reducing knee pain by 20 percent. As compared with the rate of response to placebo (60.1 percent), the rate of response to glucosamine was 3.9 percentage points higher (P=0.30), the rate of response to chondroitin sulfate was 5.3 percentage points higher (P=0.17), and the rate of response to combined treatment was 6.5 percentage points higher (P=0.09). The rate of response in the celecoxib control group was 10.0 percentage points higher than that in the placebo control group (P=0.008). For patients with moderate-to-severe pain at baseline, the rate of response was significantly higher with combined therapy than with placebo (79.2 percent vs. 54.3 percent, P=0.002). Adverse events were mild, infrequent, and evenly distributed among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate alone or in combination did not reduce pain effectively in the overall group of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Exploratory analyses suggest that the combination of glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate may be effective in the subgroup of patients with moderate-to-severe knee pain. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00032890.).

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗
PubMed2006

Comparison of 2 doses of etanercept (50 vs 100 mg) in active rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized double blind study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and efficacy of etanercept 50 mg administered twice weekly versus 25 mg administered twice weekly as monotherapy in patients with tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) blocker-naäve active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Seventy-seven patients with RA were randomized in an unequal allocation (2:1) in a blinded fashion to receive either 50 mg (51 patients) or 25 mg (26 patients) of etanercept twice a week for 24 weeks. RESULTS: The primary outcome measure, the ACR-N AUC at 24 weeks, showed no difference between the 2 dose groups. In addition, there was no difference in ACR 20, 50, and 70 responses or in EULAR response criteria by Week 24. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups in the proportion of patients with any non-infectious adverse event. The proportion of patients with upper respiratory tract infections was significantly higher in patients receiving 50 mg etanercept compared with those receiving 25 mg (26% vs 4%, p = 0.027). CONCLUSION: Etanercept as a monotherapy at 50 mg twice weekly does not provide increased efficacy when compared to the standard dose of 25 mg twice weekly in TNF-alpha blocker-naäve patients.

Antirheumatic Agents↗
PubMed2006

Documented tuberculin skin testing among infliximab users following a multi-modal risk communication interventions.

PURPOSE: Following its licensure, tuberculosis (TB) was reported as a potential adverse effect of infliximab. Subsequently, the product circular was changed to recommend tuberculin skin testing before patients received infliximab, which was reinforced by several risk communication efforts. The aim of this study was to evaluate patterns and predictors of documented tuberculin skin testing in patients before and after manufacturer, federal, and academic risk communications. METHODS: Patients administered infliximab were identified from 11 health plans located throughout the United States, and claims data were examined to determine whether the patients had received a tuberculin skin test. Patients were divided into three cohorts depending on the timing of their first infliximab treatment in relation to the risk communication efforts. RESULTS: The overall tuberculin skin testing rate doubled from 15.4% in the first cohort to 30.9% in the last cohort, while the rate of pre-infliximab treatment testing increased from 0 to 27.7% (Chi-squared test for trend, p < 0.0001 for both). Tuberculin skin testing rates were significantly higher in women, those with a diagnosis of rheumatoid or psoriatic arthritis, and those with a rheumatologist as prescriber. After multivariable analysis, only rheumatologist remained significantly associated with tuberculin skin testing. CONCLUSIONS: Although the tuberculin skin testing rate was relatively low overall, tuberculin skin testing doubled over 30 months of ongoing risk communication efforts and under ascertainment likely occurred. We also found variation in the tuberculin skin testing rate associated with physician specialty. This study demonstrates a significant change in patient care following risk communication efforts.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Long-term experience with etanercept in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in elderly and younger patients: patient-reported outcomes from multiple controlled and open-label extension studies.

BACKGROUND: The impact of long-term therapy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in elderly (> or = 65 years of age) and younger (< 65 years of age) patients, especially on patient-reported outcomes, has not been well studied. We evaluated patient-reported outcomes in elderly patients treated with etanercept, in contrast to outcomes in younger patients, using data from multiple controlled and open-label extension studies of patients with early RA (ERA; < or = 3 years) and late RA (LRA; disease-modifying antirheumatic drug [DMARD]-refractory RA). METHODS: This post hoc analysis included adult patients with RA enrolled in controlled, double-blind studies (up to 2 years) and subsequent open-label extension studies (up to 4 years). Patients were evaluated according to age at baseline of the original study. Patients may have received etanercept, placebo or methotrexate during the blinded treatment phases, but all patients had been receiving etanercept 25 mg twice weekly for at least 4 years. Both ERA and LRA extension studies are ongoing. Patient-reported outcome assessments included improvement in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), proportions of patients achieving an improvement in HAQ-DI > or = 0.22 points, patients exhibiting worsening of HAQ-DI and patients achieving an HAQ-DI score of 0. RESULTS: Elderly patients, with either ERA or LRA, had significantly worse baseline mean HAQ-DI scores than younger patients (p < 0.05, Student's t-test) in most studies, indicating greater disability. Improvement in HAQ-DI was greatest during the first 3 months after starting etanercept treatment in the controlled phase and appeared to be sustained over 3-6 months in patients with early or DMARD-refractory RA. Across the various controlled trials, mean improvements from baseline in HAQ-DI ranged from 0.39 to 0.92 points in elderly patients and from 0.57 to 1.00 points in younger patients. Patients with ERA and LRA, regardless of age group, maintained their improvement in HAQ-DI throughout the open-label extension trials for up to a total of 6 years of etanercept therapy. Change from baseline in HAQ-DI was moderately correlated with 28-joint Disease Activity Score within each age group across the multiple trials. CONCLUSION: Both elderly and younger patients with RA treated with etanercept exhibited similar and rapid improvements in functional status during controlled studies, and these improvements were sustained during open-label extension trials.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2005

Effects of doxycycline on progression of osteoarthritis: results of a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial.

OBJECTIVE: To confirm preclinical data suggesting that doxycycline can slow the progression of osteoarthritis (OA). The primary outcome measure was joint space narrowing (JSN) in the medial tibiofemoral compartment. METHODS: In this placebo-controlled trial, obese women (n = 431) ages 45-64 years with unilateral radiographic knee OA were randomly assigned to receive 30 months of treatment with 100 mg doxycycline or placebo twice a day. Tibiofemoral JSN was measured manually in fluoroscopically standardized radiographic examinations performed at baseline, 16 months, and 30 months. Severity of joint pain was recorded at 6-month intervals. RESULTS: Seventy-one percent of all randomized subjects completed the trial. Radiographs were obtained from 85% of all randomized subjects at 30 months. Adherence to the dosing regimen was 91.8% among subjects who completed the study per protocol. After 16 months of treatment, the mean +/- SD loss of joint space width in the index knee in the doxycycline group was 40% less than that in the placebo group (0.15 +/- 0.42 mm versus 0.24 +/- 0.54 mm); after 30 months, it was 33% less (0.30 +/- 0.60 mm versus 0.45 +/- 0.70 mm). Doxycycline did not reduce the mean severity of joint pain, although pain scores in both treatment groups were low at baseline and remained low throughout the trial, suggesting the presence of a floor effect. However, the frequency of followup visits at which the subject reported a > or = 20% increase in pain in the index knee, relative to the previous visit, was reduced among those receiving doxycycline. In contrast, doxycycline did not have an effect on either JSN or pain in the contralateral knee. In both treatment groups, subjects who reported a > or = 20% increase in knee pain at the majority of their followup visits had more rapid JSN than those whose pain did not increase. CONCLUSION: Doxycycline slowed the rate of JSN in knees with established OA. Its lack of effect on JSN in the contralateral knee suggests that pathogenetic mechanisms in that joint were different from those in the index knee.

Anti-Infective Agents↗
PubMed2005

Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with the selective costimulation modulator abatacept: twelve-month results of a phase iib, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of abatacept (CTLA-4Ig), a selective costimulation modulator, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) that has remained active despite methotrexate (MTX) therapy. METHODS: This was a 12-month, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. A total of 339 patients with active RA despite MTX therapy were randomly assigned to receive 10 mg/kg abatacept (n = 115), 2 mg/kg abatacept (n = 105), or placebo (n = 119). This report focuses on the results observed at month 12 of a phase IIb trial. RESULTS: A significantly greater percentage of patients treated with 10 mg/kg abatacept met the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (achieved an ACR20 response) at 1 year compared with patients who received placebo (62.6% versus 36.1%; P < 0.001). Greater percentages of patients treated with 10 mg/kg abatacept also achieved ACR50 responses (41.7% versus 20.2%; P < 0.001) and ACR70 responses (20.9% versus 7.6%; P = 0.003) compared with patients who received placebo. For patients treated with 10 mg/kg abatacept, there were also statistically significant and clinically important improvements in modified Health Assessment Questionnaire scores compared with patients who received placebo (49.6% versus 27.7%; P < 0.001). Abatacept at a dosage of 10 mg/kg elicited an increase in rates of remission (Disease Activity Score in 28 joints of <2.6) compared with placebo at 1 year (34.8% versus 10.1%; P < 0.001). The incidence of adverse events was comparable between the groups, and no significant formation of neutralizing antibodies was noted. CONCLUSION: Abatacept was associated with significant reductions in disease activity and improvements in physical function that were maintained over the course of 12 months in patients with RA that had remained active despite MTX treatment. Abatacept was found to be well tolerated and safe over the course of 1 year. Abatacept in combination with MTX has the potential to play an important role in future RA therapy.

Abatacept↗
PubMed2005

Validation of American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for knee osteoarthritis using arthroscopically defined cartilage damage scores.

OBJECTIVE: To validate the ability of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) clinical classification criteria and the ACR clinical plus radiographic classification criteria for osteoarthritis of the knee to predict articular cartilage damage. METHODS: Ninety subjects with knee osteoarthritis (OA) who were enrolled in a prospective study determining the therapeutic efficacy of arthroscopic irrigation were characterized as to whether they fulfilled the ACR clinical classification criteria or the ACR clinical plus radiographic classification criteria. Ten rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients were included as controls. Cartilage damage was defined using the ACR/Knee Arthroscopy Osteoarthritis Scale (ACR/KAOS) system, which is a validated outcome instrument for knee OA based on arthroscopic visualization. Mean values of the damage scores in each group were calculated and compared by t-test to determine statistical significance between the 3 groups. RESULTS: The mean ACR/KAOS score for the 10 RA patients was 1.8 [SD 1.22; range 0 to 4]. Of the 90 OA patients who underwent arthroscopy, only 73 patients had sufficient videotape to make an accurate assessment by the blinded assessor. The mean ACR/KAOS score for the 6 OA patients who fulfilled only the ACR clinical classification was 17.4 [SD 11.3; range 5 to 34.3] and the mean ACR/KAOS score for the 67 patients who fulfilled the ACR clinical plus radiographic classification criteria was 42.0 [SD 29.1; range 5.1 to 118.4]. These differences were statistically significant (RA versus OA clinical P=0.02; RA versus OA clinical+radiographic P<or=0.01). Nonparametric multivariate analysis did not reveal significant correlations between ACR/KAOS scores and WOMAC global scores (r=0.11, P=0.39), patient VAS (r=0.29, P=0.022), and age (r=0.29, P=0.08). CONCLUSIONS: The ACR clinical and clinical plus radiographic criteria for OA of the knee accurately predict cartilage damage as assessed by arthroscopy. Furthermore, the ACR clinical classification criteria identify OA patients with cartilage damage before any radiographic change, while the ACR clinical plus radiographic classification criteria identify OA patients with more severe cartilage damage. RELEVANCE: The ACR classification criteria correlates well with articular cartilage damage in patients with OA.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Abatacept: a costimulatory inhibitor for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

T cell costimulation is believed to be crucial in orchestrating immune responses that lead to inflammation and destruction in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Abatacept is a novel recombinant CTLA4Ig fusion protein that selectively modulates costimulation via interrupting the CD28:CD80/86 pathway, resulting in downregulation of T cell activation and multiple ensuing effector mechanisms. Abatacept has been shown to be efficacious, either when given alone or in combination with methotrexate, in patients with active RA, including anti-TNF failures. Improvements in clinical signs and symptoms, slowing of radiological progression, and enhancement in patient function and pain have been reported in clinical trials. Infusions were well-tolerated with a favourable safety profile similar to placebo and no appreciable immunogenicity. Abatacept is the first in a new class of biological response modifiers called costimulatory blockers.

Abatacept↗
PubMed2005

Responsiveness of the SF-36 and the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index in a systemic sclerosis clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: This study compares the responsiveness to change of the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), a measure of health related quality of life (HRQOL), and the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI), a function instrument, in a randomized clinical trial for treatment of systemic sclerosis (SSc). METHODS: A phase 2/3, multicenter, prospective, placebo controlled trial was conducted to evaluate human recombinant relaxin treatment in patients with diffuse SSc over 24 weeks. At baseline, subjects had stable, moderately severe, diffuse SSc of disease duration < or = 5 years, modified Rodnan skin score > or = 20, serum creatinine < 2.0 mg/dl, percentage forced vital capacity (% FVC) predicted > or = 50%, and % DLCO predicted > or = 40% and were not receiving concomitant disease modifying therapies. Internal consistency reliability of multi-item scales was estimated using Cronbach's alpha. Responsiveness to change of the SF-36 and HAQ-DI was computed between Weeks 0 and 24. Subjects were classified as unchanged or having a meaningful change in 4 different external measures: Change in (1) skin score > or = 30%; (2) % FVC predicted of > or = 15%; (3) self-reported patient global assessment by visual analog scale (VAS) > or = 20%; and (4) physician global assessment by VAS of > or = 20%. Responsiveness indices were computed and Cohen's effect size criteria were used to assess the magnitude of change. RESULTS: A total of 239 patients participated in this trial, with 196 completing the 24 week trial. Cronbach's alpha for the SF-36 scales ranged from 0.76 to 0.93 and for the HAQ-DI ranged from 0.69 to 0.91 (good to excellent). The SF-36 had a larger magnitude of responsiveness in overall disease (patient and physician global assessment) compared to the HAQ-DI, while the HAQ-DI had a larger magnitude of responsiveness in clinical measures (i.e., change in skin score and % FVC predicted) than the SF-36. CONCLUSION: These data support inclusion of both the SF-36 and HAQ-DI as outcome measures in future clinical trials of diffuse SSc.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Longterm safety, efficacy, and radiographic outcome with etanercept treatment in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate safety, efficacy, and radiographic progression in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) undergoing longterm treatment with etanercept. METHODS: Patients with early RA (disease duration of 3 years or less) who had completed a 2-year efficacy study comparing etanercept and methotrexate (MTX) were followed in an extension where they received 25 mg etanercept twice weekly. Safety was summarized descriptively and compared with data from the efficacy study. Efficacy and radiographic progression were assessed using American College of Rheumatology response criteria, disease activity scores, and Total Sharp Score (TSS). RESULTS: Rates of serious adverse events and serious infections did not increase with longterm exposure to etanercept, and were similar to rates reported for the blinded portion of the efficacy study. Efficacy was sustained in patients who completed 5 years of etanercept treatment at the time of this report (N = 201), even in those who decreased or discontinued use of MTX or corticosteroids. No radiographic progression (change in TSS < or = 0) was seen in 55% of patients with 5-year radiographs; negative change (TSS < 0) was seen in 11%. CONCLUSION: Etanercept treatment in patients with early RA was generally well tolerated for up to 5 years. The results indicate sustained efficacy and decreased rate of radiographic progression. The rate of radiographic progression was low compared with other studies, emphasizing the benefit gained in patients with early aggressive RA who undergo longterm treatment with etanercept.

Adrenal Cortex Hormones↗
PubMed2005

Severity of joint pain and Kellgren-Lawrence grade at baseline are better predictors of joint space narrowing than bone scintigraphy in obese women with knee osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of a baseline late-phase bone scan and assessments of the radiographic and symptomatic severity of knee osteoarthritis (OA) at baseline as predictors of loss of articular cartilage thickness, as reflected in joint space narrowing (JSN) in the medial tibiofemoral compartment. METHODS: Subjects (174 obese women, 45-64 yrs of age, with unilateral knee OA) were a subset of a larger cohort who participated in a placebo controlled trial of a disease modifying OA drug. Uptake of technetium medronate (99mTc-MDP) in anteroposterior (AP) and lateral views of a late-phase bone scan was measured at baseline in a region of interest drawn around the medial tibia, and was adjusted for (i.e., expressed as a ratio to) uptake in a reference segment of the tibial shaft, which served as an internal standard. Each subject underwent a fluoroscopically standardized radiographic examination of the knees (semiflexed AP view) and a pain assessment with the WOMAC OA Index at baseline, 16 months, and 30 months. RESULTS: Controlling for baseline joint space width and treatment group, multiple linear regression models showed that the adjusted 99mTc-MDP uptake at baseline was a significant predictor of joint space narrowing (JSN) in the index knee at 16 months (b = 0.180, p = 0.015) and 30 months (b = 0.221, p = 0.049). In the contralateral knee, uptake was only a marginally significant predictor of JSN at 30 months (b = 0.246, p = 0.083). Uptake in the upper and middle tertiles of the distribution predicted subjects who would exhibit JSN >/= 0.50 mm within 16 months with 65% sensitivity (PPV 23%) and 36% specificity (NPV 77%). In contrast, a prediction rule based solely on the presence of Kellgren-Lawrence grade 3 OA severity and greater than median WOMAC Pain score identified progressors with 65% sensitivity (PPV 48%) and 79% specificity (NPV 88%). CONCLUSION: Although the level of adjusted 99mTc-MDP uptake was significantly associated with JSN in knees with established radiographic OA, baseline bone scintigraphy is inferior to the radiographic severity of OA and knee pain (alone or in combination) as a predictor of loss of articular cartilage in subjects with knee OA.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia among African Americans with early rheumatoid arthritis: the impact of ethnic-specific normative data.

PURPOSE: To examine the prevalence of osteopenia and/or osteoporosis among African Americans with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to assess the effect of using race/ethnicity-specific normative data. METHODS: Bone mineral density (BMD) of the hip and spine was assessed in African Americans with early RA. To examine the impact of using different normative data on disease classification, we calculated two sets of T scores, the first using sex-matched reference data from Caucasians and the second using data from African Americans. Osteoporosis was defined as a BMD at either site > or =2.5 SD below the young adult mean. Osteopenia was defined as a BMD > or =1 SD and <2.5 SD below this mean. RESULTS: Using Caucasian referent data, 33% (n=48) of patients had osteopenia or worse (n=48, 32.9%) and 5% (n=8) were osteoporotic. With the use of African-American normative data, 55% (n=94) were osteopenic or worse, and 16% (n=27) were osteoporotic. CONCLUSION: African Americans with RA are at risk of osteopenia and/or osteoporosis. Different diagnostic classifications may occur in this population based solely on the normative data used for assessing fracture risk. These results underscore the need for a standardized approach in defining osteopenia and osteoporosis in African Americans.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗