PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Laura Loeb

Publications and source records attributed to Laura Loeb.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Evaluation and management codes: from current procedural terminology through relative update commission to Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

BACKGROUND: Physicians should have a working knowledge of the process by which patient care codes are created and subsequently assigned values. The Society of Critical Care Medicine has representatives on the national committees that focus on code creation and definition and on assignment of relative value units. In addition, a better understanding of documentation requirements and the audit process will facilitate improved compliance and minimize liability. DISCUSSION: The authors discuss the current procedural terminology (CPT) process for defining care codes and the relative update commission (RUC) process for assigning values to those codes, with each code assigned a separate value in three separate categories. Steps for managing any concern or dispute about billing, denials, or an audit are subsequently addressed. Tenets of proper documentation are discussed, and some future developments are identified that are likely to affect critical care. CONCLUSION: Knowledge of the procedures by which care codes are defined and valued is necessary for using these codes properly, as well as for addressing needs unmet by existing codes. Preventing audits is the best approach to proper coding and billing, and documentation is key.

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S.↗

Proceedings adapted from a payor panel.

BACKGROUND: This panel featured four representatives from the healthcare industry and government, offering an opportunity for critical care professionals to pose questions and discuss issues and concerns relevant to anyone caring for critically ill and injured patients today. A brief biography is provided for each panelist. DISCUSSION: The Society of Critical Care Medicine Advocacy Committee recognized that there are not enough opportunities for clinicians and other members of the critical care team to discuss questions or issues with their counterparts on the payor side of providing clinical care. That is, much of the difficulty faced by providers after providing critical care services could be resolved if the channels of communication were opened, and so a payor panel was organized to start the process. CONCLUSION: Each of the panelists provided a prepared statement on issues relevant to critical care, as evident from their respective roles. Specific scenarios and other suggestions regarding payment policy, coding, and quality of care are provided.

Critical Care↗