Laura Pilotto | PubMed Health

PubMed2005

The Left Ventricular Dysfunction Questionnaire: Italian translation and validation.

UNLABELLED: Patients affected by heart failure have a compromised quality of life (QOL) and in the last few years "health related quality of life" has become an important outcome indicator for the evaluation of heart failure treatment. METHODS: Translation into Italian of the Left Ventricular Dysfunction Questionnaire (LVD-36), a new, 36-item, disease-specific health status instrument for patients with congestive heart failure, and its subsequent validation by administration to 50 consecutive patients in our heart failure outpatient clinic. The Italian LVD-36 was compared to the "The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire" (MLHF). RESULTS: The Italian version of the LVD-36 correlates well with MLHF for ejection fraction (EF), NYHA class I and II, etiology and therapy. Since, however, the LVD-36 has only one domain, it may be able to offer more synthetic information than MLHF about patients' status. CONCLUSIONS: The Italian version of the LVD-36 appears to be a reliable instrument for assessing patients' QOL and the degree of limitations imposed on them by the disease. It is short, clear and easy to complete. In patients with heart failure the LVD-36 correlates well with the MLHF and may be considered a new disease-specific instrument to estimate changes in health status, and an useful support in optimizing therapeutic options.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗

PubMed2003

The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire: Italian translation and validation.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have demonstrated that patients affected by heart failure have a compromised quality of life and, in the last few years, "health-related quality of life" has become an important outcome indicator for the evaluation of heart failure treatment and a basis for the improvement of its strategies. METHODS: The translation into Italian of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ), a new, 23 item, disease-specific health status instrument for patients with congestive heart failure, and its subsequent validation by asking 50 consecutive patients in our heart failure outpatient clinic to answer it. The KCCQ was compared to the "Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire" (MLHF). RESULTS: The Italian version of the KCCQ correlates well with the MLHF for all domains with the exclusion of symptom stability score and MLHF emotional domain. However, the KCCQ, due to its multiple domains, provided more detailed information about the patients' status, and identified the more compromised ones. CONCLUSIONS: The KCCQ appears to be a valid and reliable instrument for the assessment of a patient's quality of life and the degree of limitations imposed upon him/her by the disease. When compared to the MLHF, the KCCQ, however, is somewhat more sensitive in identifying more compromised patients. This capacity could be advantageously used for the identification of clinical changes in future trials and lead to a better planning of new therapeutic interventions.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗