PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Laura Reden

Publications and source records attributed to Laura Reden.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Shape recovery algorithms using level sets in 2-D/3-D medical imagery: a state-of-the-art review.

The class of geometric deformable models, also known as level sets, has brought tremendous impact to medical imagery due to its capability of topology preservation and fast shape recovery. In an effort to facilitate a clear and full understanding of these powerful state-of-the-art applied mathematical tools, this paper is an attempt to explore these geometric methods, their implementations and integration of regularizers to improve the robustness of these topologically independent propagating curves/surfaces. This paper first presents the origination of level sets, followed by the taxonomy of level sets. We then derive the fundamental equation of curve/surface evolution and zero-level curves/surfaces. The paper then focuses on the first core class of level sets, known as "level sets without regularizers." This class presents five prototypes: gradient, edge, area-minimization, curvature-dependent and application driven. The next section is devoted to second core class of level sets, known as "level sets with regularizers." In this class, we present four kinds: clustering-based, Bayesian bidirectional classifier-based, shape-based and coupled constrained-based. An entire section is dedicated to optimization and quantification techniques for shape recovery when used in the level set framework. Finally, the paper concludes with 22 general merits and four demerits on level sets and the future of level sets in medical image segmentation. We present applications of level sets to complex shapes like the human cortex acquired via MRI for neurological image analysis.

Algorithms↗

White and black blood volumetric angiographic filtering: ellipsoidal scale-space approach.

Prefiltering is a critical step in three-dimensional (3-D) segmentation of the blood vessel and its display (see the recent book by Suri et al.). This paper presents a scale-space approach for filtering the white blood and black blood angiographic volumes and its implementation issues. The raw MR angiographic volume is first converted to isotropic volume followed by 3-D higher order separable Gaussian derivative convolution with known scales to generate edge volume. The edge volume is then run by the directional processor at each voxel where the eigenvalues of the 3-D ellipsoid are computed. The vessel score per voxel is then estimated based on these three eigenvalues which suppress the nonvasculature and background structures yielding the filtered volume. The filtered volume is ray-cast to generate the maximum intensity projection images for display. The performance of the system is evaluated by computing the mean, variance, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) images. The system is run over 20 patient studies from different areas of the body such as the brain, abdomen, kidney, knee, and ankle. The computer program takes around 150 s of processing time per study for a data size of 512 x 512 x 194, which includes the complete performance evaluation. We also compare our strategy with the recently published MR filtering algorithms by Alexander et al. and Sun et al.

Algorithms↗

A review on MR vascular image processing: skeleton versus nonskeleton approaches: part II.

Vascular segmentation has recently been given much attention. This review paper has two parts. Part I of this review focused on the physics of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and prefiltering techniques applied to MRA. Part II of this review presents the state-of-the-art overview, status, and new achievements in vessel segmentation algorithms from MRA. The first part of this review paper is focused on the nonskeleton or direct-based techniques. Here, we present eight different techniques along with their mathematical foundations, algorithms and their pros and cons. We will also focus on the skeleton or indirect-based techniques. We will discuss three different techniques along with their mathematical foundations, algorithms and their pros and cons. This paper also includes a clinical discussion on skeleton versus nonskeleton-based segmentation techniques. Finally, we shall conclude this paper with the possible challenges, the future, and a brief summary on vascular segmentation techniques.

Algorithms↗

A review on MR vascular image processing algorithms: acquisition and prefiltering: part I.

Vascular segmentation has recently been given much attention. This review paper has two parts. Part I focuses on the physics of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) generation and prefiltering techniques applied to MRA data sets. Part II of the review focuses on the vessel segmentation algorithms. The first section of this paper introduces the five different sets of receive coils used with the MRI system for magnetic resonance angiography data acquisition. This section then presents the five different types of the most popular data acquisition techniques: time-of-flight (TOF), phase-contrast, contrast-enhanced, black-blood, T2-weighted, and T2*-weighted, along with their pros and cons. Section II of this paper focuses on prefiltering algorithms for MRA data sets. This is necessary for removing the background nonvascular structures in the MRA data sets. Finally, the paper concludes with a clinical discussion on the challenges and the future of the data acquisition and the automated filtering algorithms.

Algorithms↗