PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Laurent Layani

Publications and source records attributed to Laurent Layani.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Perforated diverticulitis managed by laparoscopic lavage.

BACKGROUND: Traditionally the management of acute diverticulitis complicated by perforation has been the Hartmann's procedure, which may be associated with significant morbidity and mortality and the unpleasantness of a colostomy. We present our early experience in managing perforated diverticulitis acutely by laparoscopic lavage and drainage. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of all patients with surgically confirmed perforated diverticulitis. Details concerning the nature of presentation, operative findings, postoperative course and medium-term progress were investigated. RESULTS: Fourteen patients with a mean age of 57.2 years were identified over a 3-year period. All patients presented with peritonitis and systemic sepsis. Ten patients had extraluminal gas on preoperative imaging. Laparoscopic lavage and drainage, without resection or stoma, was the initial management in all cases. Sigmoid diverticulitis was confirmed in all cases, complicated by Hinchey grade 3 purulent peritonitis in 10 patients, grade 2 contamination in 2 patients and grade 4 faeculent peritonitis in 2 patients. Eleven patients (79%) improved and were discharged following a median of 6.5 days (range, 5-32 days). Three patients did not improve and underwent acute resection. Eight patients have subsequently undergone elective resection without a stoma at a mean interval of 6 weeks, which was carried out laparoscopically in all but one case. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic lavage and drainage in the acute management of perforated acute diverticulitis may be a promising alternative to more radical procedures, including the Hartmann's procedure. Acute resection should still be carried out in patients found to have faecal peritonitis or who fail to improve following lavage.

Adult↗

Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in patients > or =60 years old: is it worthwhile?

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) is an effective treatment for morbid obesity in younger patients, leading to improvements in related co-morbidities and quality of life. Currently, little is known how these improvements apply to older patients. METHODS: A prospective review was conducted of patients > or =60 years old undergoing LAGB. Weight loss, complications, changes in Short Form-36 (SF-36) scores, and a comprehensive post-operative co-morbidity, medication and quality of life questionnaire were used to assess performance. RESULTS: 40 patients with mean age 65.8 years (range 60-72) and preoperative mean BMI of 42.2 kg/m(2) (range 33-54) underwent LAGB from February 2000 to September 2005. Mean excess weight lost at 2 years was 54%. 3 complications (7.5%) occurred (1 slippage and 2 access-port infections). There were no perforations, erosions or deaths. After a mean postoperative interval of 27 months, SF-36 scores improved significantly in 4 of 8 components and exceeded age-matched population controls in 3 components. Co-morbidity improvement was reported in 80% of patients with diabetes, 79% with dyslipidemia, 75% with obstructive sleep apnea, 72% with heartburn, 69% with hypertension, 60% with musculoskeletal pain, and 56% with anxiety/depression. Medication requirements reduced or ceased in 66% who required musculoskeletal analgesics, 43% of diabetics, 33% using bronchodilators, and 29% with hypertension. Sleep improved in 48%, self-esteem increased in 70%, and 72% had a better outlook on life. 82% were happy that they had undergone LAGB, and 91% would recommend LAGB to other older people. CONCLUSION: LAGB offers safe and effective weight loss, and improvement in co-morbidities and in quality of life in morbidly obese patients aged > or =60 years.

Age Factors↗