PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Lee Ann Miller

Publications and source records attributed to Lee Ann Miller.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Guidelines for interactions between clinical faculty and the pharmaceutical industry: one medical school's approach.

A productive and ethical relationship between the pharmaceutical industry and physicians is critical to improving drug discovery and public health. In response to concerns about inappropriate financial relationships between the pharmaceutical industry and physicians, national organizations representing physicians or industry have made recommendations designed to reduce conflicts of interest, legal exposure, and dissemination of biased information. Despite these initiatives, the prescribing practices of physicians may be unduly influenced by the marketing efforts of industry and physicians may inadvertently distribute information that is biased in favor of a commercial entity. Moreover, physicians may be vulnerable to prosecution through federal anti-kickback and false claims statutes because of potentially inappropriate financial relationships with pharmaceutical companies. Since academic medical centers have a critical role in establishing professional standards, the faculty of Yale University School of Medicine developed guidelines for the relationships of faculty with the pharmaceutical industry, which were approved in May 2005. Input from clinical faculty and from representatives of the pharmaceutical industry was utilized in formulating the guidelines. In contrast to existing recommendations, the Yale guidelines, which are presented as an Appendix here, ban faculty from receiving any form of gift, meal, or free drug sample (for personal use) from industry, and set more stringent standards for the disclosure and resolution of financial conflict of interest in Yale's educational programs. The growing opportunities for drug discovery, the need to use medications in a more evidence-based manner, and preservation of the public trust require the highest professional standards of rigor and integrity. These guidelines are offered as part of the strategy to meet this compelling challenge.

Codes of Ethics↗

Using online modules is a multi-modality teaching system: a high-touch high-tech approach to geriatric education.

Making geriatric education available to rural faculty/preceptors, students, and practitioners presents many challenges. Often the only options considered for educating those in the health professions about geriatrics are either traditional face-to-face courses or distance education programs. The purpose of this paper was to examine the use of Web-based modules or courses and other distance learning technology in concert with traditional learning modalities. The Mountain State Geriatric Education Center explored the use of a multi-modal approach within a high-touch, high-tech framework. Our findings indicate the following: it is important to start where participants are ready to begin; flexibility and variety are needed; soliciting evaluative feedback from participants is valuable; there is a need to integrate distance learning with more traditional modalities; and a high-tech, high-touch approach provides a format which participants find acceptable, accessible, and attractive. This assertion does not rule out the use of technology for distance education but rather encourages educators to take advantage of a wide range of modalities, traditional and technological, to reach rural practitioners, faculty, and students.

Computer-Assisted Instruction↗

An Internet-based pediatric clerkship examination.

A traditional paper final exam was expensive and time consuming to create, administer and grade at two separate training sites. Our goal was to determine whether restructuring the final pediatric clerkship examination using Internet technology could lower costs and be more efficient, reliable and preferred by students. Costs and coordinator time were compared with the prior year of traditional testing. Student satisfaction was determined by an electronic post-test survey. To evaluate for reliability, the scores on our Internet test were compared with United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) shelf scores. An estimated 1200 US dollars per year of department costs was saved, and coordinator time was greatly reduced. The post-test survey indicated the students were very satisfied with this testing. When compared with USMLE scores the Cronbach's alpha was 0. 70, and the Pearson Correlation was r = 0.414 (p<0. 001). It is concluded that a well-designed Internet-based test has advantages over a traditional paper exam. It reduces incremental department costs, is reliable,preferred by students and can be given simultaneously at multiple locations.

Clinical Clerkship↗