PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Leif E Olsson

Publications and source records attributed to Leif E Olsson.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

A simplified 5-step model for training laparoscopic urethrovesical anastomosis.

PURPOSE: We developed a training model and program aimed at improving the skills of urologists with no previous experience in laparoscopy to perform a running suture urethrovesical anastomosis as is done during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our program is performed on a pelvic trainer with a videolaparoscopic unit and consists of passage of a ligature, intracorporal knotting, intracorporal suturing, linear anastomosis and circular running suture anastomosis. The trainees performed the first 3 tasks during the initial lessons and then advanced to the 2 final tasks. At the end of each lesson time was recorded and progression curve was plotted for each participant for each task. The end point of the study was participant ability to perform an accurate circular anastomosis. Logarithmic regression analysis was used to assess the significance of progression. RESULTS: All 10 urologists who participated in this study showed a rapid and significant decrease in the time required to perform the first 3 tasks accurately. The participants were able to perform a linear anastomosis after 3 to 5 lessons and an accurate circular anastomosis after 5 to 10 lessons. CONCLUSIONS: By using this model and dividing a complicated surgical step to simplified tasks, we were able to improve trainee performance significantly in a short time. A training program for basic and advanced laparoscopic skills should be incorporated into the syllabus of urologists-in-training and available to those who wish to gain experience in laparoscopic surgery.

Anastomosis, Surgical↗

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Laparoscopy has become an integral part of urologic surgery. Its indications have been progressively extended to the most advanced oncologic and reconstructive procedures. Within this frame, radical prostatectomy is of major interest, especially considering the incidence and clinical significance of prostate cancer. The procedure comprises several steps of challenging dissection in which the preservation of delicate nerve and muscular structures should be conciliated with safe tumor excision. The intervention ends with vesicourethral anastomosis, which is considered the most difficult reconstructive procedure in urologic laparoscopy. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy has gradually become a wholly standardized procedure, and it is now routinely performed in several centers throughout the world.

Humans↗

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: published series.

Next to the retropubic and perineal approaches, laparoscopic radical prostatectomy has become the third most common technique in the surgical treatment of localized prostate cancer. Although long-term oncologic data are still lacking, based on several contemporary series, it seems likely that oncologic results will fulfill expectations. Over the past decade, quality-of-life issues have come into the spotlight in oncologic surgery in particular. In this regard, the aim of the laparoscopic technique is to become the best in terms of operative stress, postoperative morbidity, catheterization time, and return to normal activities. The unique intraoperative visibility and magnification of the operative field allow ultraprecise dissection and suturing of vital neural and sphincteric structures. Will the use of this new kind of surgery translate into better functional results? The goal of this review is to analyze the published results of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in the context of its rapidly evolving open surgical counterpart.

Erectile Dysfunction↗