PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Lene Koch

Publications and source records attributed to Lene Koch.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

The ethics of functional genomics: same, same, but different?

Respect for human life--a notion of worth uniting all members of the human race--constitutes a sense of anthropocentrism that has long been the justification for the enrollment of animals in experimentation executed to develop therapies to alleviate human suffering. Currently, however, advances in functional genomics are causing a qualitative transformation of the rationale for medical research performed on animals. The notion of human distinctness is being fundamentally challenged when gene sequences similar to those found in humans are identified in different species. In this Opinion article, we would like to highlight an inherent tension brought about by the current developments in functional genomics: a tension between the scientific and the ethical status of gene sequences. Is it reasonable to argue that they are the same for all practical purposes but different in ethical status?

Animal Rights↗
PubMed2006

[Social and family considerations in genetic counselling].

Genetic knowledge can be viewed as an important tool in the prevention of hereditary disease. This article discusses the social issues that the link between genetics and prevention raises in cancer genetic counselling and testing. In particular, the moral dilemmas which health professionals and patients face in relation to disclosing genetic information to kin are described. The authors argue that questions about disclosing information and balancing autonomy and responsibility are not only ethical questions but biopolitical issues.

Family↗
PubMed2005

Providing solutions--defining problems: the imperative of disease prevention in genetic counselling.

Common sense states that problems make people look for solutions. This article proposes the contrary, i.e. that solutions provide the framework within which certain problems can be stated and handled. Drawing on observations of cancer genetic counselling in Denmark and official recommendations concerning the practice of genetic counselling, this article explores how the new prophylactic possibilities become the lens through which risk factors are identified and defined as problems that require action. In particular, the question of how new possibilities to prevent hereditary disease challenge the traditional non-directive ethos of clinical genetics provides the occasion to analyse governmentality processes in clinical genetic dialogues. The article argues that an imperative of choosing disease prevention in genetic counselling transforms the notion of non-directiveness as well as the notions of autonomy and informed consent. The transforming event is the transmission of expert knowledge on genetic risk from counsellor to counsellee. This process of knowledge transmission creates autonomous individuals who, through the medium of choice, consent voluntarily to take personal responsibility for themselves and their relatives. Conceived as a health technology, genetic counselling is a practice through which hegemonic knowledge claims about saving lives by acting responsibly is created. Disease prevention as the solution to increased risks comes to stand out as the right way of relating to oneself, the family, and society.

Genetic Counseling↗
PubMed2004

The meaning of eugenics: reflections on the government of genetic knowledge in the past and the present.

The recent development of molecular genetics has created concern that society may experience a new eugenics. Notions about eugenics and what took place in the 1930s and 1940s are actively shaping questions about which uses of new genetics should be considered illegitimate. Drawing upon a body of historiographical literature on Scandinavian eugenics, this paper argues that the dominant view of eugenics as morally and scientifically illegitimate is not tenable when it comes to the uses of compulsion, political motivation, and scientific acceptability. In spite of a general condemnation of eugenics, health authorities today are trying to prevent individuals with deviant behavior from reproducing or at least from rearing children. This may not be argued with reference to the risk of transmitting defective genes, but rather the risk of producing undesirable social problems. Drawing on a Foucauldian approach, the paper concludes that eugenics and new genetics should be seen as two historically specific forms of biopower.

Eugenics↗