PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Leo Finci

Publications and source records attributed to Leo Finci.

8 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Impact of sirolimus-eluting and Paclitaxel-eluting stents on outcome in patients with diabetes mellitus and stenting in more than one coronary artery.

Randomized trials have shown that implantation of sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PESs) reduce the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) compared with bare metal stents. We compared the impact of SESs and PESs on clinical outcome in medically treated diabetic patients with multivessel stents. In this study, the in-hospital and 9-month clinical outcomes of 260 consecutive diabetic patients who underwent implantation of SESs (147 patients) or PESs (113 patients) were compared. MACEs were defined as death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and clinically driven target vessel revascularization. The baseline demographic and angiographic characteristics were well matched. An average of 3.0 +/- 1.3 versus 2.8 +/- 1.2 lesions were treated in the SES and PES groups, respectively (p = 0.34), with a mean stented length per patient of 73 +/- 43 versus 61 +/- 36 mm (p = 0.08). No significant difference was observed between the SES and PES groups for in-hospital (6.1% vs 3.5%, p = 0.34) or 9-month MACE (24.5% vs 19.5%, p = 0.34) rates or for subacute (1.4% vs 0.9%, p = 0.72) or late (0.7% vs 0.9%, p = 0.85) stent thrombosis. Insulin-requiring diabetic patients treated with SESs and PESs also had similar demographic and angiographic characteristics and rates of in-hospital (4.7% vs 7.7%, p = 0.57) and 9-month (28.0% vs 38.4%, p = 0.44) MACEs. Insulin-dependent diabetes was the only independent predictor of MACEs (odds ratio 2.68, 95% confidence interval 1.46 to 4.89, p = 0.001). In conclusion, our results demonstrated a relatively high incidence of MACEs in a diabetic population with multivessel disease, despite treatment with drug-eluting stents. In addition, we could not find any clear advantage of 1 type of stent versus the other.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Preliminary experience with the Frontrunner coronary catheter: novel device dedicated to mechanical revascularization of chronic total occlusions.

The novel device Frontrunner coronary catheter (FCC), dedicated to recanalization of chronic total occlusions (CTOs), relies on blunt microdissections inside the plaque, allowing passage of guidewire through the lesion and adjunctive angioplasty. In order to evaluate efficacy and safety of recanalization using the FCC device, we included patients with de novo or restenotic CTOs in a native coronary artery with prior failure using a guidewire or considered unsuitable for guidewire attempt in which the FCC was attempted first. Between October 2000 and June 2003, 50 patients with 50 CTOs were included in the study. Thirty-two patients had prior failure with a mechanical wire. Device and angiographic success were obtained in 25 (50%) occlusions: 53% in lesions with prior guidewire failure and 44% when FCCs were attempted first (P = 0.8). During the first year of experience, angiographic success was 42% (5 occlusions) and in the third year 75% (12 occlusions; P = 0.12). Coronary perforation occurred in nine (18.0%) patients, leading to tamponade in two (4%) patients. Perforations occurred in 5 out of 12 attempted patients during the first year and in 4 out of 38 patients in the following period (41.7% vs. 10.5%; P = 0.04). Serious adverse events occurred in five (10%) patients within 30-day follow-up. Four non-Q-wave myocardial infarctions occurred in hospital (clinical success 42%) and one death 7 days after the index procedure. The use of FCC increases the success to open chronic total occlusions refractory to mechanical guidewires or that were considered unsuitable for an attempt with a guidewire. The risk of coronary perforation due to FCC use is relatively high and it can decrease with experience.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Incidence, predictors, in-hospital, and late outcomes of coronary artery perforations.

We sought to determine the incidence of coronary perforations, predisposing factors, and in-hospital and late outcome of patients with coronary perforations. Perforations occurred in 0.84% of treated lesions and more frequently in patients with complex lesions after atheroablative procedures and who underwent intravascular ultrasound guided lumen optimization. The incidence of adverse events, emergency coronary artery bypass grafting and death significantly decreased over time.

Causality↗
PubMed2003

A new dedicated stent and delivery system for the treatment of bifurcation lesions: preliminary experience.

We report the first clinical experience in eight patients with a new stent and delivery system specifically designed for the treatment of bifurcational lesions. The device (AST SLK-View system) consists of a premounted stent and a delivery system. The stent has a side aperture, which orients toward the ostium of the side branch. The system allows deployment of the stent while the access to both main and side branches is maintained by two wires. We evaluated this system in nine bifurcations. The location of bifurcations was left descending artery/diagonal branch in four lesions, left circumflex/obtuse marginal branch in three lesions, and postero-lateral branch/posterior descending artery in two lesions. Predilation was performed in six lesions of the main branches and in five lesions of the side branches. The stent was effectively delivered to all bifurcations except for one, in which the target lesion was located at a distal segment and the device could not be delivered. Following stent implantation in the main branch, two lesions at the side branches were treated by stent, while the other lesions were treated by balloon angioplasty without difficulty. Final kissing balloon was performed in four bifurcation lesions. No adverse event was observed during 1 month of clinical follow-up. Treatment of bifurcation lesions with this new dedicated device appears to be feasible. This new device may introduce a new approach for the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Results and long-term predictors of adverse clinical events after elective percutaneous interventions on unprotected left main coronary artery.

BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention of de novo lesions in unprotected left main coronary arteries remains an unresolved issue. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed 67 consecutive patients treated with the following devices: 39 with stents, 12 with rotational atherectomy plus stents, 13 with directional coronary atherectomy plus stents (a total of 64 patients were treated with stents), and 3 patients with directional coronary atherectomy only. The reference vessel size was 3.78+/-0.73 mm and lesion length was 6.6+/-3.0 mm. In-hospital complications were 2 coronary artery bypass grafts (CABGs) (3.0%), 2 Q-wave myocardial infarctions (MIs) (3.0%), and 3 non-Q-wave MIs (4.5%); there were no deaths. The estimated cardiac survival at 3 years was 91%. The cardiac mortality rate was higher in patients with Parsonnet score >15 versus < or =15 (21.4% versus 4.2%, P=0.02) at 3 years. The independent covariate of cardiac death was preserved left ventricular ejection fraction; for combined cardiac events (cardiac death, MI, repeat revascularization) it was large reference vessel size. Follow-up angiography at 5+/-2 months in 85% of eligible patients revealed 31.4% restenosis. Extending the follow-up to 31+/-23 months (19 patients with follow-up beyond 3 years) the cumulative event rates were 11 deaths (16.4%), 8 of them cardiac (11.9%), 2 (3.0%) MI, and 16 (23.9%) repeat revascularizations (CABG in 5 patients). CONCLUSIONS: Elective percutaneous coronary intervention of de novo lesions in left main coronary arteries is feasible, with low procedural risk. The long-term follow-up revealed a high rate of angiographic restenosis and repeat revascularization, with a relatively high incidence of cardiac death. Reference vessel size and left ventricular function are the most important predictors of favorable follow-up.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Outcome of nonobstructive residual dissections detected by intravascular ultrasound following percutaneous coronary intervention.

The purpose of this study was to assess the outcome of nonobstructive (or non-flow-limiting) residual dissection (RD) after percutaneous coronary intervention. Results of 124 consecutive native coronary lesions with angiographic nonobstructive RD in 97 patients (RD group) were compared with outcomes of 124 lesions without RD in 100 patients (non-RD group), whose characteristics were matched with those of the RD group. RD occurred after stent implantation (81 of 124 lesions, 65%) or balloon angioplasty (43 of 124 lesions, 35%). Angiographic types of RD were type A in 8 lesions (6%), B in 101 (82%), and C in 15 (12%). Stents were implanted in 65% of the lesions in each group. Clinical success (94% in RD group vs 95% in non-RD group, p = 0.77) and the in-hospital major adverse cardiac event rates were found to be similar in the 2 groups (6% vs 3%, respectively; p = 0.33). The late angiographic and clinical outcomes were also comparable. By intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) evaluation of the dissections in the RD group, area stenosis correlated with the incidence of in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (p = 0.023), whereas the final minimal lumen area correlated inversely with the occurrence of restenosis (p = 0.011). An area stenosis > or =58% was the best predictor for the incidence of in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (sensitivity 0.68, specificity 0.68). Most nonobstructive RDs are "favorable" and do not need stent implantation. IVUS evaluation identifies "unfavorable" nonobstructive (or non-flow-limiting) dissections that might be prone to acute occlusion. Nonobstructive dissections can be left untreated when final IVUS reveals an area stenosis of < 60% at the site of a dissection.

Aortic Dissection↗
PubMed1998

Coronary stent implantation throughout technical evolution: immediate and follow-up results.

Coronary stenting (stent implantation) has evolved over the last 5 years with changes in stent design, stent material and the implantation technique. The use of high-pressure balloon inflation (HP), intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and appropriate antiplatelet therapy have contributed to the abolishment of the need for subsequent anticoagulation, allowing extended stent applications. We compared results in three groups of patients having stent implantation throughout the period of evolution: group A: no IVUS, no HP, with subsequent anticoagulation treatment (n 3 434); group B: no IVUS, yes HP, without subsequent anticoagulation treatment (n 3 192); and group C: yes IVUS, yes HP, without subsequent anticoagulation treatment (n 3 588). The primary success rates were comparable in all groups. There was a clear change in indications for stenting in groups B and C compared with group A (elective stenting: group A 3 32%; group B 3 66%; group C 3 69%; P < 0.0001), in reference vessel size (group A 3 3.22 3 0.37 mm; group B 3 2.92 3 0.56 mm; group C 3 2.98 3 0.57 mm; P < 0.0001), and for presence of type B2 and C lesions (group A 3 57%; group B 3 72%; group C 3 74%; P < 0.001). The complication rate significantly decreased in group C (group A 3 3.6%; group B 3 4.1%; group C 3 1.2%; P < 0.001) and the mean patient hospital stay decreased to 2 days in groups B and C due to the abolition of the need for anticoagulant treatment. The angiographic restenosis rate increased in groups B and C (group A 3 20%; group B 3 34%; group C 3 32%; P < 0.001). The need for a repeat procedure increased as stenting of more complex lesions and smaller vessels was attempted: target lesion revascularization (TLR) was performed in 16% of patients in group A (73/434), in 18% of group B (35/192) and in 22% of group C (129/588) (P 3 0.04 for A versus C). Major cardiac events (MACE) occurred in 142 patients in group A (33%), 60 patients in group B (31%) and in 181 patients in group C (30%). The evolving technique of coronary stenting has expanded the spectrum of indications and range of coronary vessels attempted, and decreased the complication rates and hospital stay. However, in less-favorable subsets, additional improvements are needed to affect the long-term outcome.

Journal Article↗