PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Leon Kaufman

Publications and source records attributed to Leon Kaufman.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Coronary calcium scoring: modelling, predicting and correcting for the effect of CT scanner spatial resolution on Agatston and volume scores.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of spatial resolution on coronary calcium scoring by x-ray CT, to assess the scoring performance of different CT scanners as they are operated in the field and to correct for the effects of CT scanner spatial resolution on coronary calcium scoring. A phantom consisting of five aluminium wires of known diameter in water was used to measure spatial resolution and to assess scoring performance. Fourteen CT scanners (three helical, two dual, two electron-beam and seven multi-detector) from four manufacturers were evaluated, some under different operating conditions. One scanner was monitored over a 3 month period and again 6 months later. Both spatial resolution and image pixel size significantly affect calcium scoring results. Spatial resolution can be measured with a precision of about 2%. Scanner spatial resolution ranged from 1 to 1.7 mm full-width-half-maximum (FWHM), and pixel size from 0.25 to 0.86 mm. Spatial resolution differences introduce systematic scoring differences that range from 38% to 1100% depending on wire size. Significant temporal variations in spatial resolution were observed in the monitored scanner. By correcting all the scanners to the same target spatial resolution, the standard deviation of individual scanners with respect to a mean value (the spread) can be reduced by 25-70% for different wires. In conclusion, scanner spatial resolution significantly affects calcium scoring and should be controlled for. Scanner performance can change over time. Under ideal conditions, CT scanners should be operated with a standard spatial resolution for calcium scoring. When this is not possible, post-processing correction is a viable alternative.

Arteriosclerosis↗

A rosetta stone for coronary calcium risk stratification: agatston, volume, and mass scores in 11,490 individuals.

OBJECTIVE: We introduce stratification data for three methods (Agatston, volume, mass) obtained from one single patient population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Measurements in 11,490 individuals scanned from 1999 to 2002 with electron-beam CT were used for this study. RESULTS: Our Agatston score ranges agree reasonably well with the Kondos values except for measurements in patients at the extreme ages, at which we sampled a wider age range and consequently had different biases of averages. Neither method is preferable because except for a small percentage of individuals near the dividing lines, stratification is the same for the three methods. When we matched them against a known "lesion" phantom, the Agatston and volume scores behave nonlinearly, and the latter grossly overestimates volume. The mass method is linear except for lesions near the edge of detectability and matches known volumes to within a small percentage. CONCLUSION: We provide validated risk stratification data for use with mass scoring methods.

Adult↗

Scoliosis evaluation by direct digital radiography and computerized post-processing.

With the introduction of direct digital radiography into clinical practice, there are opportunities to provide faster and more reliable ways of performing traditional radiological tasks. A technique was developed for evaluating and measuring scoliosis, which involves the computerized stitching of a radiograph of the thoracic spine with a radiograph of the lumbar spine. A technique is provided for real-time, graphic feedback during the stitching process, as well as during calculation and display of the Cobb angle to ensure accuracy. Initial data indicates an accuracy within 1 to 2 degrees. The time required to stitch the two images and measure the Cobb angle is on the average of 5 minutes per case. Using computerized techniques of image stitching and angle calculation, with real-time graphical feedback, the task of scoliosis evaluation is more accurate, less time consuming, and prone to fewer human errors. The requirement for special film cassettes is also eliminated.

Humans↗