PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Leonie Short

Publications and source records attributed to Leonie Short.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2004

A matter of trust--patient's views on decision-making in colorectal cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To determine which aspects of the treatment decision process, therapy and outcomes are most important to patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 102 men and 73 women who had completed primary treatment for CRC in two teaching hospitals in Central Sydney, Australia. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Patient's rating of the importance of the decision-making aspects and outcomes of treatment for CRC. RESULTS: Trust in their surgeon and confidence of specialty training are of paramount importance to CRC patients. Patients also have a strong desire to get on with treatment quickly and rate the risk of disease recurrence and quality of life as being very important in their treatment decisions. Gender, age and whether the patient had undergone adjuvant radiotherapy were all significant predictors of preferred mode of treatment decision-making. Fifty-eight per cent of women preferred a shared decision-making role compared with 36% of men, whilst older patients and those who had undergone adjuvant radiotherapy were significantly more likely to prefer that their surgeon decide upon treatment when compared with younger patients and respondents who have not had radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of whether a patient prefers an active or more passive role in decision-making, having a surgeon explain treatment options in a clear, unhurried and open manner is vital to how patients feel about their treatment. Whilst acknowledging that individual patients will have different needs for information and preferences for treatment, there are several factors amongst many in the process of decision-making which are considered very important by patients with CRC. A surgeon who adopts a consultation style that is open and informative, that offers patients the chance to participate in the process of decision-making and clearly explain treatment options and outcomes will engender trust with their patient.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Measuring the importance of attributes that influence consumer attitudes to colorectal cancer screening.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to rate the importance of attributes of screening for bowel cancer. METHOD: Randomly selected households in central Sydney were contacted to identify men and women aged 50-70 years who were then asked to complete a self-administered questionnaire about bowel cancer screening and related issues. Seven hundred and ninety-one residents (362 men and 429 women) returned questionnaires. Respondents were asked to rate the extent to which each of 34 attributes would encourage them to participate in bowel cancer screening. RESULTS: The three most highly rated attributes were: if the test was recommended by their general practitioner (GP; 94% either 'strongly agreed' or 'agreed'); if the test identified early cancers (92%); and if the test would avert a premature death due to bowel cancer (90%). Having a friend or relative with bowel cancer (61%), advertising (41%) or famous people promoting the program (62%) were less influential. Respondents who were unemployed or on a pension were less likely to participate in screening than those who were employed if there was an 'out of pocket' charge of 15.00 Australian dollars (chi 2 = 7.56, 2df, P = 0.006). Respondents with higher levels of education were significantly more concerned than respondents with lower levels of education about test accuracy (chi 2 = 15.76, 2df, P < 0.001), its availability from their local chemist (chi 2 = 16.96, 2df, P < 0.001), being able to return the test kit by post (chi 2 = 21.9, 2df, P < 0.001) or deposit it with their local chemist (chi 2 = 10.0, 2df, P < 0.01). They were also less likely to be influenced by a famous person promoting bowel cancer screening (chi 2 = 18.87, 2df, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results endorse the role of the GP in bowel cancer screening. However, the study also has demonstrated that test accuracy, the convenience of the screening service and notification of test results are valued differently by subgroups in the community, according to their level of education.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2003

Evidence-based consumer choice: a case study in colorectal cancer screening.

OBJECTIVES: To elicit community preferences for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening by faecal occult blood test (FOBT) using discrete choice modeling (DCM). To provide policymakers with information that would assist them in designing the future national screening program. METHODS: 301 participants in central Sydney, aged 50 to 70 years, at 'average' risk of CRC, participated in a face-to-face discrete choice study interview in which screening profiles were posed to derive estimates for preferences for CRC FOBT screening. RESULTS: Three characteristics were varied in our screening profiles, namely: benefit (CRC deaths prevented); potential harm (false positive induced colonoscopy); and notification policy (of test result). Ninety-four respondents (32%) did not trade off CRC deaths prevented for any reduction in harms. Twelve per cent always chose no screening. The remaining 56% traded benefits and harms. These latter respondents (n = 164) were willing to accept 853 (false positive induced) colonoscopies for one CRC death prevented. CONCLUSIONS: While survival was all that mattered for just over one-third of the sample and 12% would choose no screening, the remaining individuals were prepared to trade CRC deaths prevented against other characteristics. CRC screening will not receive unqualified community support, irrespective of harms. IMPLICATIONS: In any future national CRC screening program, consideration of these insights about community assessment of benefits, harms, costs and other characteristics of CRC screening is warranted.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Knowledge, attitude and intentions related to colorectal cancer screening using faecal occult blood tests in a rural Australian population.

A telephone survey with 604 men and women without history of colorectal cancer (CRC) (age 50-74 years) explored knowledge of, attitudes toward, and intention to screen for CRC using faecal occult blood tests (FOBT) in a rural Australian population. Overall, 53% intended to participate in and 86% would follow a doctor's recommendation for FOBT screening. In contrast, only 18% had ever had a FOBT, and fewer than 60% of those with high-risk family history had undergone appropriate screening for CRC. Prior use of FOBT (OR=3.2), high perceived susceptibility to CRC (OR=2.4), belief in the importance of screening despite the absence of symptoms (OR=2.1) were positively and older age (OR = 0.5) was negatively related to screening intention in multivariate logistic regression analysis. A doctor's recommendation improved screening intention among those who never tested for CRC before but believe in the importance of early treatment. This study highlights the lack of compliance with standard CRC screening recommendations in Australia and provides evidence for the importance of continued educational efforts, with the particular emphasis on older adults and the medical community.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Faecal occult blood test: current practice in a rural Queensland community.

The findings of a recent telephone survey of 604 residents (50-74 years of age) in a rural community in Queensland are presented. The survey focused on the participants' knowledge concerning the faecal occult blood test (FOBT) and their previous testing history. Responses were analysed in terms of gender, age and education differences. More than half of all participants were aware of the FOBT, and 109 (18%) had undergone FOBT in the past. Fewer understood the importance of "health checks without symptoms" than the "advantage of early treatment". The most common reasons to use FOBT were: "prevention" and "I want to know if I have cancer". A person's gender, age and education were shown to be associated with their knowledge and beliefs. These results suggest an increase in the use of the FOBT with time (in relation to previous surveys), but a poor understanding of its place in promoting health.

Age Factors↗