PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Leslie A Saxon

Publications and source records attributed to Leslie A Saxon.

11 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2004

Cardiac-resynchronization therapy with or without an implantable defibrillator in advanced chronic heart failure.

BACKGROUND: We tested the hypothesis that prophylactic cardiac-resynchronization therapy in the form of biventricular stimulation with a pacemaker with or without a defibrillator would reduce the risk of death and hospitalization among patients with advanced chronic heart failure and intraventricular conduction delays. METHODS: A total of 1520 patients who had advanced heart failure (New York Heart Association class III or IV) due to ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathies and a QRS interval of at least 120 msec were randomly assigned in a 1:2:2 ratio to receive optimal pharmacologic therapy (diuretics, angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors, beta-blockers, and spironolactone) alone or in combination with cardiac-resynchronization therapy with either a pacemaker or a pacemaker-defibrillator. The primary composite end point was the time to death from or hospitalization for any cause. RESULTS: As compared with optimal pharmacologic therapy alone, cardiac-resynchronization therapy with a pacemaker decreased the risk of the primary end point (hazard ratio, 0.81; P=0.014), as did cardiac-resynchronization therapy with a pacemaker-defibrillator (hazard ratio, 0.80; P=0.01). The risk of the combined end point of death from or hospitalization for heart failure was reduced by 34 percent in the pacemaker group (P<0.002) and by 40 percent in the pacemaker-defibrillator group (P<0.001 for the comparison with the pharmacologic-therapy group). A pacemaker reduced the risk of the secondary end point of death from any cause by 24 percent (P=0.059), and a pacemaker-defibrillator reduced the risk by 36 percent (P=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with advanced heart failure and a prolonged QRS interval, cardiac-resynchronization therapy decreases the combined risk of death from any cause or first hospitalization and, when combined with an implantable defibrillator, significantly reduces mortality.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed2003

Cardiac resynchronization therapy for the treatment of heart failure in patients with intraventricular conduction delay and malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to assess the safety and effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) when combined with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). BACKGROUND: Long-term outcome of CRT was measured in patients with symptomatic heart failure (HF), intraventricular conduction delay, and malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmias (ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation [VT/VF]) requiring therapy from an ICD. METHODS: Patients (n = 490) were implanted with a device capable of providing both CRT and ICD therapy and randomized to CRT (n = 245) or control (no CRT, n = 245) for up to six months. The primary end point was progression of HF, defined as all-cause mortality, hospitalization for HF, and VT/VF requiring device intervention. Secondary end points included peak oxygen consumption (VO(2)), 6-min walk (6 MW), New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, quality of life (QOL), and echocardiographic analysis. RESULTS: A 15% reduction in HF progression was observed, but this was statistically insignificant (p = 0.35). The CRT, however, significantly improved peak VO(2) (0.8 ml/kg/min vs. 0.0 ml/kg/min, p = 0.030) and 6 MW (35 m vs. 15 m, p = 0.043). Changes in NYHA class (p = 0.10) and QOL (p = 0.40) were not statistically significant. The CRT demonstrated significant reductions in ventricular dimensions (left ventricular internal diameter in diastole = -3.4 mm vs. -0.3 mm, p < 0.001 and left ventricular internal diameter in systole = -4.0 mm vs. -0.7 mm, p < 0.001) and improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (5.1% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.020). A subgroup of patients with advanced HF (NYHA class III/IV) consistently demonstrated improvement across all functional status end points. CONCLUSIONS: The CRT improved functional status in patients indicated for an ICD who also have symptomatic HF and intraventricular conduction delay.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Isolated bundle branch block and left ventricular dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Population studies have identified the presence of bundle branch block (BBB) as a risk factor for increased mortality in patients with known cardiac disease. It is unknown how chronic ventricular dyssynchrony resulting solely from conduction delay affects ventricular function. METHODS AND RESULTS: Subjects were retrospectively identified from the University of California, San Francisco, electrocardiogram database with QRS prolongation. Subjects who had no evidence of heart disease and had baseline and serial studies evaluating ongoing risk of coronary artery disease status and left ventricular function were followed over time. Documentation of a minimum of 2 serial evaluations of cardiac status were present in a total of 51/176 (20%) subjects with isolated BBB who constitute the study population. After a mean follow-up of 52 +/- 45 months-adjusting for differences due to age, sex, the presence of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes mellitus-left ventricular ejection fraction diminished by -7.3 +/- 12% per year in the isolated left BBB cohort versus -1.9 +/- 4% in isolated right BBB cohort and -1.1 +/- 3% reduction in the isolated nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay cohort (P =.019). CONCLUSIONS: Left bundle branch block itself may be a cause of ventricular dysfunction.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Effects of long-term biventricular stimulation for resynchronization on echocardiographic measures of remodeling.

BACKGROUND: Long-term ventricular resynchronization therapy improves symptom status. Changes in left ventricular remodeling have not been adequately evaluated. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-three patients with systolic heart failure and bundle-branch block underwent implantation of biventricular stimulation (BVS) devices as part of a randomized trial. Echocardiograms were acquired at randomization and at 6-week intervals until completion of 12 weeks of continuous BVS. There were no changes in heart rate or QRS duration after 12 weeks of BVS. Serum norepinephrine values did not change with BVS. After 12 weeks of BVS, left atrial volume decreased. Left ventricular end-systolic and end-diastolic dimensions and left ventricular end-systolic volume also decreased after 12 weeks of BVS. Sphericity index did not change. Measures of systolic function, including left ventricular outflow tract and aortic velocity time integral and myocardial performance index, improved. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term resynchronization therapy results in atrial and ventricular reverse remodeling and improved hemodynamics.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Heart failure and Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) therapy: Update and perspective on current primary prevention trials.

BACKGROUND: Recently completed studies have evaluated the role of the Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) in extending life in the letting of left ventricular dysfunction. METHODS AND RESULTS: All major primary prevention ICD trials performed in the United States are reviewed. CONCLUSIONS: Data to date supports the use of the ICD for primary prevention of sudden death in the setting of ischemic left ventricular dysfunction. Data is lacking in an advanced heart failure population and in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Ventricular resynchronization: a promising therapy for heart failure.

Primarily a disease of the elderly, heart failure continues to be an ever-increasing health care problem given the growth in the number of individuals over age 65. Although there have been many advances in the pharmacologic management of heart failure, there continues to be a significant number of patients with persistent symptoms despite maximal therapy and it is likely that this group of patients will only continue to increase in number. Given this, significant research has gone into exploring new modalities, such as device therapies, to treat heart failure. Of these, ventricular resynchronization has emerged as one of the most promising. This review will examine the most important aspects of ventricular resynchronization therapy including: the significance of ventricular dyssynchrony, the role of traditional pacemakers, the effects on contractile function and reverse remodeling, and the currently accepted indications for resynchronization devices. Additionally, various aspects of completed and ongoing trials will be discussed.

Aged↗