Biomedical subjects

Leslie Glasser

Publications and source records attributed to Leslie Glasser.

10 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Born-Haber-Fajans cycle generalized: linear energy relation between molecules, crystals, and metals.

Classical procedures to calculate ion-based lattice potential energies (U(POT)) assume formal integral charges on the structural units; consequently, poor results are anticipated when significant covalency is present. To generalize the procedures beyond strictly ionic solids, a method is needed for calculating (i) physically reasonable partial charges, delta, and (ii) well-defined and consistent asymptotic reference energies corresponding to the separated structural components. The problem is here treated for groups 1 and 11 monohalides and monohydrides, and for the alkali metal elements (with their metallic bonds), by using the valence-state atoms-in-molecules (VSAM) model of von Szentpály et al. (J. Phys. Chem. A 2001, 105, 9467). In this model, the Born-Haber-Fajans reference energy, U(POT), of free ions, M(+) and Y(-), is replaced by the energy of charged dissociation products, M(delta)(+) and Y(delta)(-), of equalized electronegativity. The partial atomic charge is obtained via the iso-electronegativity principle, and the asymptotic energy reference of separated free ions is lowered by the "ion demotion energy", IDE = -(1)/(2)(1 - delta(VS))(I(VS,M) - A(VS,Y)), where delta(VS) is the valence-state partial charge and (I(VS,M) - A(VS,Y)) is the difference between the valence-state ionization potential and electron affinity of the M and Y atoms producing the charged species. A very close linear relation (R = 0.994) is found between the molecular valence-state dissociation energy, D(VS), of the VSAM model, and our valence-state-based lattice potential energy, U(VS) = U(POT) - (1)/(2)(1 - delta(VS))(I(VS,M) - A(VS,Y)) = 1.230D(VS) + 86.4 kJ mol(-)(1). Predictions are given for the lattice energy of AuF, the coinage metal monohydrides, and the molecular dissociation energy, D(e), of AuI. The coinage metals (Cu, Ag, and Au) do not fit into this linear regression because d orbitals are strongly involved in their metallic bonding, while s orbitals dominate their homonuclear molecular bonding.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2006

Volume-based thermodynamics: estimations for 2:2 salts.

The lattice energy of an ionic crystal, U(POT), can be expressed as a linear function of the inverse cube root of its formula unit volume (i.e., Vm(-1/3)); thus, U(POT) approximately 2I(alpha/Vm(1/3) + beta), where alpha and beta are fitted constants and I is the readily calculated ionic strength factor of the lattice. The standard entropy, S, is a linear function of Vm itself: S approximately kVm + c, with fitted constants k and c. The constants alpha and beta have previously been evaluated for salts with charge ratios of 1:1, 1:2, and 2:1 and for the general case q:p, while values of k and c applicable to ionic solids generally have earlier been reported. In this paper, we obtain alpha and beta, k and c, specifically for 2:2 salts (by studying the ionic oxides, sulfates, and carbonates), finding that U(POT)[MX 2:2]/(kJ mol(-1)) approximately 8(119/Vm(1/3) + 60) and S degree [MX 2:2]/(J K(-1) mol(-1)) approximately 1382V(m) + 16.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2005

Predictive thermodynamics for condensed phases.

Thermodynamic information is central to assessment of the stability and reactivity of materials. However, because of both the demanding nature of experimental thermodynamics and the virtually unlimited number of conceivable compounds, experimental data is often unavailable or, for hypothetical materials, necessarily impossible to obtain. We describe simple procedures for thermodynamic prediction for condensed phases, both ionic and organic covalent, principally via formula unit volumes (or density); our volume-based approach (VBT) provides a new thermodynamic tool for such assessment. These methods, being independent of detailed knowledge of crystal structures, are applicable to liquids and amorphous materials as well as to crystalline solids. Examples of their use are provided.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2004

Difference rule-a new thermodynamic principle: prediction of standard thermodynamic data for inorganic solvates.

We present a quite general thermodynamic "difference" rule, derived from thermochemical first principles, quantifying the difference between the standard thermodynamic properties, P, of a solid n-solvate (or n-hydrate), n-S, containing n molecules of solvate, S (water or other) and the corresponding solid parent (unsolvated) salt: [P[n-solvate] - P[parent]]/n = constant = theta(P)[S,s-s], or n-S and other solvate, n'-S: [P[-solvate] - P[n'-solvate]]/(n - n') = [P[n-S ] - P[n'-S]]/(n - n') = constant = theta(P)[S,s-s] where P may be any one of: U(POT) (the lattice potential energy), V(m) (the molecular or formula unit volume), Delta(f)H degrees , Delta(f)S degrees , Delta(f)G degrees or (the standard thermodynamic functions of formation and the absolute entropy), and n can be noninteger. The constants, theta(P)[S,s-s], for each property, P, of solvate of type S, are established by correlation of the available set of experimental data. We also show that, when solid-state data for a particular solvate is sparse, theta(P)[S,s-s] can be reliably predicted from liquid-state values, P[S,l], or even gas-state values, P[S,g]. This rule offers a powerful means for predicting unknown thermodynamic data, extending the compass of currently known thermodynamic information. Systems considered involve the following solvates: H(2)O (hydrates), D(2)O, NH(3), ND(3), (CH(3))(2)O, NaOH, CH(3)OH, C(2)H(5)OH, (CH(2)OH)(2), H(2)S, SO(2), HF, KOH, and (CH(CH(3))(2))(2)O. Detailed examples of usage are given for hydrates and for SO(2).

Journal Article↗

PubMed2004

The ionic isomegethic rule and additivity relationships: estimation of ion volumes. A route to the energetics and entropics of new, traditional, hypothetical, and counterintuitive ionic materials.

By virtue of our recently established relationships, knowledge of the formula unit volume, V(m), of a solid ionic material permits estimation of thermodynamic properties such as standard entropy, lattice potential energy, and, hence, enthalpy and Gibbs energy changes for reactions. Accordingly, development of an approach to obtain currently unavailable ion volumes can expose compounds containing these ions to thermodynamic scrutiny, such as predictions regarding stability and synthesis. The isomegethic rule, introduced in this paper, states that the formula unit volumes, V(m), of isomeric ionic salts are approximately the same; this rule then forms the basis for a powerful and successful means of predicting unknown ion volumes (as well as providing a means of validating existing volume and density data) and, thereby, providing solid state thermodynamic data. The rule is exploited to generate unknown ion and (by additivity) corresponding formula unit volumes.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2004

Thermodynamic clarification of the curious ferric/potassium ion exchange accompanying the electrochromic redox reactions of prussian blue, iron(III) hexacyanoferrate(II).

The recent Glasser-Jenkins method for lattice-energy prediction, applied to an examination of the solid-state thermodynamics of the cation exchanges that occur in electrochromic reactions of Prussian Blue, provides incisive thermodynamic clarification of an ill-understood ion exchange that accompanies particularly the early electrochromic cycles. A volume of 0.246 +/- 0.017 nm(3) formula unit(-1) for the ferrocyanide ion, Fe(II)[(CN)(6)],(4-) is first established and then used, together with other formula unit-volume data, to evaluate the changes of standard enthalpy, entropy, and Gibbs energy in those ion-exchange reactions. The results impressively show by how much the exchange of interstitial Fe(3+) ions by alkali metal ions, usually exemplified by K+, is thermodynamically favored.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2003

Standard absolute entropy, S degrees 298 values from volume or density. 1. Inorganic materials.

Standard absolute entropies of many inorganic materials are unknown; this precludes a full understanding of their thermodynamic stabilities. It is shown here that formula unit volume, V(m)(), can be employed for the general estimation of standard entropy, S degrees 298 values for inorganic materials of varying stoichiometry (including minerals), through a simple linear correlation between entropy and molar volume. V(m)() can be obtained from a number of possible sources, or alternatively density, rho, may be used as the source of data. The approach can also be extended to estimate entropies for hypothesized materials. The regression lines pass close to the origin, with the following formulas: For inorganic ionic salts, S degrees 298 /J K(-)(1) mol(-)(1) = 1360 (V(m)()/nm(3) formula unit(-)(1)) + 15 or = 2.258 [M/(rho/g cm(-)(3))] + 15. For ionic hydrates, S degrees 298 /J K(-)(1) mol(-)(1) = 1579 (V(m)()/nm(3) formula unit(-)(1)) + 6 or = 2.621 [M/(rho/g cm(-)(3))] + 6. For minerals, S degrees 298 /J K(-)(1) mol(-)(1) = 1262 (V(m)()/nm(3) formula unit(-)(1)) + 13 or = 2.095 [M/(rho/g cm(-)(3))] + 13. Coupled with our published procedures, which relate volume to other thermodynamic properties via lattice energy, the correlation reported here complements our development of a predictive approach to thermodynamics and ultimately permits the estimation of Gibbs energy data. Our procedures are simple, robust, and reliable and can be used by specialists and nonspecialists alike.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2002

Ionic hydrates, M(p)X(q).nH(2)O: lattice energy and standard enthalpy of formation estimation.

This paper is one of a series (see: Inorg. Chem. 1999, 38, 3609; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 632; Inorg. Chem. 2002, 41, 2364) exploring simple approaches for the estimation of lattice energies of ionic materials, avoiding elaborate computation. Knowledge of lattice energy can lead, via thermochemical cycles, to the evaluation of the underlying thermodynamics involving the preparation and subsequent reactions of inorganic materials. A simple and easy to use equation for the estimation of the lattice energy of hydrate salts, U(POT)(M(p)X(q).nH(2)O) (and therefore for solvated salts, M(p)X(q).nS, in general), using either the density or volume of the hydrate, or of another hydrate, or of the parent anhydrous salt or the volumes of the individual ions, is derived from first principles. The equation effectively determines the hydrate lattice energy, U(POT)(M(p)X(q).nH(2)O), from a knowledge of the (estimated) lattice energy, U(POT)(M(p)X(q)), of the parent salt by the addition of ntheta(U) where theta(U)(H(2)O)/kJ mol(-1) = 54.3 and n is the number of water molecules. The average volume of the water molecule of hydration, V(m)(H(2)O)/nm(3) = 0.0245, has been determined from data on a large series of hydrates by plotting hydrate/parent salt volume differences against n. The enthalpy of incorporation of a gaseous water molecule into the structure of an ionic hydrate, [Delta(f)H degrees (M(p)X(q).nH(2)O,s) - Delta(f)H degrees (M(p)X(q),s) - nDelta(f)H degrees (H(2)O,g)], is shown to be a constant, -56.8 kJ (mol of H(2)O)(-1). The physical implications with regard to incorporation of the water into various types of solid-state structures are considered. Examples are given of the use of the derived hydrate lattice energy equation. Standard enthalpies of formation of a number of hydrates are thereby predicted.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2002

Lattice potential energy estimation for complex ionic salts from density measurements.

This paper is one of a series exploring simple approaches for the estimation of lattice energy of ionic materials, avoiding elaborate computation. The readily accessible, frequently reported, and easily measurable (requiring only small quantities of inorganic material) property of density, rho(m), is related, as a rectilinear function of the form (rho(m)/M(m))(1/3), to the lattice energy U(POT) of ionic materials, where M(m) is the chemical formula mass. Dependence on the cube root is particularly advantageous because this considerably lowers the effects of any experimental errors in the density measurement used. The relationship that is developed arises from the dependence (previously reported in Jenkins, H. D. B.; Roobottom, H. K.; Passmore, J.; Glasser, L. Inorg. Chem. 1999, 38, 3609) of lattice energy on the inverse cube root of the molar volume. These latest equations have the form U(POT)/kJ mol(-1) = gamma(rho(m)/M(m))(1/3) + delta, where for the simpler salts (i.e., U(POT)/kJ mol(-1) < 5000 kJ mol(-1)), gamma and delta are coefficients dependent upon the stoichiometry of the inorganic material, and for materials for which U(POT)/kJ mol(-1) > 5000, gamma/kJ mol(-1) cm = 10(-7) AI(2IN(A))(1/3) and delta/kJ mol(-1) = 0 where A is the general electrostatic conversion factor (A = 121.4 kJ mol(-1)), I is the ionic strength = 1/2 the sum of n(i)z(i)(2), and N(A) is Avogadro's constant.

Journal Article↗

PubMed1999

Relationships among Ionic Lattice Energies, Molecular (Formula Unit) Volumes, and Thermochemical Radii.

The linear generalized equation described in this paper provides a further dimension to the prediction of lattice potential energies/enthalpies of ionic solids. First, it offers an alternative (and often more direct) approach to the well-established Kapustinskii equation (whose capabilities have also recently been extended by our recent provision of an extended set of thermochemical radii). Second, it makes possible the acquisition of lattice energy estimates for salts which, up until now, except for simple 1:1 salts, could not be considered because of lack of crystal structure data. We have generalized Bartlett's correlation for MX (1:1) salts, between the lattice enthalpy and the inverse cube root of the molecular (formula unit) volume, such as to render it applicable across an extended range of ionic salts for the estimation of lattice potential energies. When new salts are synthesized, acquisition of full crystal structure data is not always possible and powder data provides only minimal structural information-unit cell parameters and the number of molecules per cell. In such cases, lack of information about cation-anion distances prevents use of the Kapustinskii equation to predict the lattice energy of the salt. However, our new equation can be employed even when the latter information is not available. As is demonstrated, the approach can be utilized to predict and rationalize the thermochemistry in topical areas of synthetic inorganic chemistry as well as in emerging areas. This is illustrated by accounting for the failure to prepare diiodinetetrachloroaluminum(III), [I(2)(+)][AlCl(4)(-)] and the instability of triiodinetetrafluoroarsenic(III), [I(3)(+)][AsF(6)(-)]. A series of effective close-packing volumes for a range of ions, which will be of interest to chemists, as measures of relative ionic size and which are of use in making our estimates of lattice energies, is generated from our approach.

Journal Article↗