PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Levent Tuncay

Publications and source records attributed to Levent Tuncay.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Does two episodes of acute urinary retention lead to additional ischemia-reperfusion injury in rat bladder?

AIM: To determine whether two episodes of acute urinary retention lead to additional ischemia-reperfusion injury due to decompression of the bladder, or not. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sham, retention and recurrent retention groups consisting of 5, 8 and 8 Wistar Albino male rats were randomized, respectively. After the bladders of rats were emptied with 3F catheter, penile urethras were clamped with aneurism clamp and waited for 30 min after diuresis was forced. At the end of this period, penile clamps were removed and the bladder was again decompressed with 3F catheter and after 30 min removed for examination. In the recurrent retention group, the same process was repeated after an interval of one week. Malonedialdehyde (MDA) levels, indicator of lipid peroxidation and myeloperoxidase (MPO) levels, indicator of leukocyte activation, were examined biochemically in the tissues of the removed bladders. RESULTS: In the retention and recurrent retention groups, the average increase in bladder MDA and MPO values was higher than the values of sham group (P < 0.05), however, no significant difference was determined between retention and recurrent retention groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: In the bladder tissue, due to acute urinary retention and following decompression process, ischemia-reperfusion injury occurs. Two episodes of acute urinary retention do not lead to additional the ischemia-reperfusion injury that develops in the bladder.

Animals↗

Elevation of serum and urinary carbohydrate antigen 19-9 in benign hydronephrosis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to find out the predictive role of serum and urinary carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels in benign hydronephrosis and whether these levels are helpful for differentiation of complete or partial urinary obstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-four patients with, and 23 without, benign hydronephrosis were enrolled in this study. Serum and urinary carbohydrate antigen 19-9 were determined by the chemiluminescence enzyme immunometric assay method and these levels were correlated with clinical factors. RESULTS: The mean serum (P < 0.0001) and urinary (P < 0.0001) carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and serum creatinine (P < 0.008) levels were significantly higher in the hydronephrosis group than the control group. There was significant correlation between serum and urinary carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels in the hydronephrosis group (r = 0.639, P < 0.0001). In the hydronephrosis group, there were no significant differences between the serum creatinine, serum or urinary carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels and the clinical features except symptom duration. The best cut-off value for the serum and urinary carbohydrate antigen 19-9 were found to be 4.84 U/mL and 29.35 U/mL, respectively. CONCLUSION: Serum and urinary carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels correlated with each other, were significantly elevated in patients with hydronephrosis and did not predict complete urinary obstruction. Benign hydronephrosis should be considered in the differential diagnosis of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 increments, as this is what is of most importance in clinical practice.

Adult↗

Does digital rectal examination affect uroflowmetry measurements?

AIMS: To determine whether digital rectal examination (DRE) would affect uroflowmetry parameters and whether these findings were not due to the circaidan changes. METHODS: A total of 79 male patients (59 in study and 20 in control group) were included in this study. First uroflowmetry was done at 10:00 am just before the genitourinary physical examination in the study group. Second and third uroflowmetry was performed at the 6th and 24th hour after the first uroflowmetry. The same uroflowmetry tests were done in a control group without DRE. Voided volume and maximum and average flow rate parameters of uroflowmetry were interpreted in our study. The relationship among first, second, and third uroflowmetry parameters were determined in the study and control groups. RESULTS: There were statistically no difference between the mean first, or 6th- or 24th-hour uroflowmetry parameters of the study and control groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We could not find any effect of DRE on uroflowmetry parameters. Studies in a larger patient series would be appropriate for recommending DRE before or after uroflowmetry test.

Aged↗