Biomedical subjects

Liana Abramova

Publications and source records attributed to Liana Abramova.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2007

Interferon Alfa-2b or not 2b? Significant differences exist in the decision-making process between melanoma patients who accept or decline high-dose adjuvant interferon Alfa-2b treatment.

BACKGROUND: Patients with thick (Breslow>4 mm) primary melanoma and/or regional nodal metastasis have a high risk of tumor recurrence. High-dose adjuvant interferon (IFN) alfa-2b offers /=50% risk of recurrence/disease-related mortality and offered IFN. Telephone surveys delineated reasons behind patients' decisions to accept IFN. RESULTS: Acceptors, 60 of 135 (45%), decided to take IFN alfa-2b whereas 75 of 135 (55%) declined. Being female (OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.17-5.03; p=.017) and positive SLN status (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.01-4.97; p=.048) were strongly associated with patients who chose IFN. Acceptors of IFN were younger, more influenced by physicians, and less affected by depression and side effect profile (p<.05 for all). Decliners were more concerned by strained relationships with family and social life (p<.05). CONCLUSIONS: Gender and positive SLN were predictive of high-risk melanoma patients' acceptance of IFN treatment. Physician insight into melanoma patients' therapeutic decision-making process can guide patients through this difficult disease.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Sentinel node biopsy in vulvar and vaginal melanoma: presentation of six cases and a literature review.

BACKGROUND: Urogenital melanoma is a rare neoplasm with poor prognosis. Its management in the past involved radical vulvectomy and complete bilateral inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy. Sentinel lymph node biopsy is an accurate low-morbidity procedure when used in the context of cutaneous melanoma. However, prophylactic lymphadenectomy has not been shown to improve survival of melanoma patients. We wanted to determine the feasibility of sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with female urogenital melanoma as a staging procedure. METHODS: Six patients with vulvar or vaginal melanomas underwent preoperative lymphatic mapping with (99m)Tc-labeled sulfur colloid followed by sentinel lymphadenectomy. In addition, we reviewed the literature on the application of sentinel lymph node biopsy in urogenital tract melanomas. RESULTS: One or more sentinel nodes were identified in all six patients by lymphoscintigraphy. All patients underwent sentinel lymphadenectomy, except for one patient with a deep vaginal melanoma that drained to pelvic nodes. The five successful cases had unilateral drainage patterns. None of the sentinel lymph nodes excised had tumor invasion. Combined with five other patients from the published literature, the success rate of localizing sentinel lymph nodes in the patients with urogenital melanoma approaches 100%. CONCLUSIONS: This experience, plus reports of a small number of patients from three similar studies, supports the impression that sentinel lymph node biopsy is feasible for vulvar and vaginal melanoma.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Problems in the interpretation of apparent "radial growth phase" malignant melanomas that metastasize.

BACKGROUND: The delineation of radial and vertical growth phases in primary cutaneous malignant melanomas has contributed to our understanding of melanoma progression and has enhanced the ability of pathologists to provide clinicians with meaningful prognostic information. Vertical growth phase (VGP) lesions have the potential to metastasize, but radial growth phase (RGP) melanomas are believed to lack competence for metastasis. METHODS: We have identified three cases in which metastasis occurred in association with lesions initially interpreted as RGP melanomas. To determine whether these cases truly represented exceptional metastasizing RGP melanomas or VGP lesions incorrectly identified as RGP lesions, careful microscopic re-review of these cases was performed. RESULTS: In one case, additional microscopic sectioning revealed a focus of vertical growth that was not evident on the original sections. In the other two cases, only radial growth was found. In one of these cases there was melanoma in situ with regressive changes, but no evidence for invasive melanoma. In the other, a RGP lesion was associated with an adjacent compound nevus with periadnexal involvement. CONCLUSIONS: These cases suggest that, while true RGP melanomas have an excellent prognosis, caution must be exercised in defining a lesion as having no metastatic potential when multiple sections of the primary lesion are unavailable, when the lesion is accompanied by regressive changes, or when there is an associated melanocytic nevus. It is possible that strictly defined RGP melanomas may metastasize in very rare cases. Our observations also suggest that metastatic potential is a function of numerous factors, and may not be evaluable on morphological grounds alone.

Adult↗