PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Liffert Vogt

Publications and source records attributed to Liffert Vogt.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Cellular cholesterol efflux to plasma from proteinuric patients is elevated and remains unaffected by antiproteinuric treatment.

BACKGROUND: Lipid derangements are assumed to contribute to the elevated cardiovascular risk in proteinuric patients. The impact of proteinuria on reverse cholesterol transport (RCT) is unknown. The first step in RCT, cellular cholesterol efflux to plasma, may be altered in proteinuria, consequent to changes in pre-beta high-density lipoprotein (HDL) formation and plasma phospholipid transfer protein (PLTP) activity. METHODS: In six non-diabetic male patients with nephrotic-range proteinuria and 12 matched healthy men, plasma (apo)lipoproteins, pre-beta HDL formation, PLTP activity as well as the ability of plasma to promote cholesterol efflux out of cultured human skin fibroblasts were determined. These variables were also measured in response to antiproteinuric treatment, consisting of single and dual RAAS blockade by losartan and lisinopril. RESULTS: Plasma total cholesterol (P<0.05), triglycerides (P<0.05), apolipoprotein (apo) A-I (P<0.001), apo B (P<0.001), PLTP activity (P<0.005) and pre-beta HDL formation (P<0.001) were higher in proteinuric patients. Cellular cholesterol efflux to plasma from proteinuric patients was 41% higher than to plasma from healthy subjects (P<0.001). Reduction of proteinuria from 5.0 to 1.4 g/day by dual RAAS blockade was associated with a 23% reduction in plasma apo B levels (P<0.05). Pre-beta HDL formation and plasma PLTP activity did not change significantly. Combined antiproteinuric treatment did not reduce the elevated cellular cholesterol efflux. CONCLUSION: Cellular cholesterol efflux to plasma from patients with nephrotic-range proteinuria is enhanced, in conjunction with elevated pre-beta HDL formation and plasma PLTP activity. These changes may attenuate the cardiovascular risk associated with proteinuria-associated hyperlipidaemia. Antiproteinuric therapy lowers plasma apo B, but does not affect cell-derived cholesterol efflux, suggesting that this therapy beneficially affects cardiovascular risk in proteinuric patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

The angiotensin II receptor antagonist telmisartan reduces urinary albumin excretion in patients with isolated systolic hypertension: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of telmisartan or hydrochlorothiazide on the control of urinary albumin excretion (UAE) in patients with isolated systolic hypertension (ISH) unselected for albuminuria in a pre-planned substudy of a large, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study. METHODS: The Angiotensin II Receptor Antagonist Micardis in Isolated Systolic hypertension (ARAMIS) study compared the antihypertensive efficacy after 6 weeks of once-daily fixed doses of telmisartan 20, 40 or 80 mg versus hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg or placebo in patients (n = 1039, aged 35-84 years) with ISH (seated blood pressure 150-179/< 90 mmHg). The prospective substudy analysed UAE using spot morning samples. RESULTS: Urinary albumin (> 2.2-901.6 mg/l) was detected at baseline in 614 out of 918 patients who were included in the substudy analysis. In the telmisartan group (n = 354, all doses combined), a median reduction in UAE from a baseline of 14.1% [95% confidence interval (CI) 7.3, 21.8] was observed versus 1.1% (95% CI -13.5 to 16.0) and 2.7% (95% CI -0.9 to 19.9) in the hydrochlorothiazide (n = 140) and placebo (n = 120) groups, respectively. The difference between telmisartan and hydrochlorothiazide was significant (P = 0.017). Reductions in UAE with telmisartan were observed in patients with baseline normoalbuminuria, microalbuminuria or macroalbuminuria. Telmisartan and hydrochlorothiazide produced comparable reductions in systolic blood pressure in these patients. CONCLUSION: In patients with ISH unselected for baseline albuminuria, telmisartan 20-80 mg after 6 weeks' treatment afforded significantly greater lowering of UAE than hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg, irrespective of the baseline UAE, and despite comparable reductions in systolic blood pressure with both drugs.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Individual titration for maximal blockade of the renin-angiotensin system in proteinuric patients: a feasible strategy?

Agents that interfere with the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) reduce proteinuria and afford renal protection. The combination of different measures that serve maximization of RAS blockade is thought to improve the antiproteinuric efficacy. The feasibility and the efficacy of such a combination strategy were studied in nondiabetic patients with residual proteinuria during previous RAS blockade by individual antiproteinuric titration. Previous medication was replaced by irbesartan 300 mg combined with a diuretic. Lisinopril was added in increasing doses until a maximal dose of 40 mg/d. Titration stopped when target proteinuria (< 1 g/d) was reached or further dose titration was not tolerated because of side effects. Residual proteinuria (median, 3.2 g/d; 95% confidence interval, 1.8 to 5.2 g/d) was significantly reduced with 55.6% (95% confidence interval, 16.0 to 73.2%; P < 0.02) on the maximal additional tolerated dose of lisinopril. The maximal dose of lisinopril was 10 mg in two of eight, 20 mg in two of eight, 30 mg in one of eight, and 40 mg in three of eight patients. At this dose, target proteinuria of < 1 g/d was reached in two of eight patients. The number of patients with adverse events during dose titration was five of eight patients: two had cough; two had hyperkalemia (> 5.5 mmol/L), one of whom had > 50% increase of serum creatinine; and one had dizziness. In conclusion, individual titration for maximal RAS blockade, entailing dose titration of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on top of high-dose angiotensin II antagonists with diuretic, induces further reduction of residual proteinuria. However, this occurs at the expense of adverse events. To further improve renoprotective treatment strategies, it is important to explore other modes of antiproteinuric intervention in patients with residual proteinuria during RAS blockade.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

The COOPERATE trial.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists↗
PubMed2002

Renoprotection: a matter of blood pressure reduction or agent-characteristics?

Data from recent clinical trials show that lowering of BP reduces the rate of renal function loss in chronic renal disease. There is evidence supporting the assertion that BP lowering obtained by intervention in the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) has an additive renoprotective effect in both diabetic and nondiabetic renal diseases. However, to dissociate BP-dependent and non-BP-dependent action of RAAS blockade, the relevant trials are in many cases flawed by design, resulting in BP differences between the comparative antihypertensive strategies. This review discusses whether the relevant literature allows for the conclusion that RAAS intervention has renoprotective effects in addition to its effects on BP. In particular, the main evidence for a specific renoprotective action of RAAS blockade is provided by its consistent antiproteinuric action, which cannot completely be attributed to the reduction in BP. Indeed, other strategies that lower proteinuria without having an antihypertensive effect, such as lowering dietary protein intake or the use of non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs, appear to have a renoprotective effect as well. Interestingly, a consistent finding across different intervention studies is that the more proteinuria is reduced the better the kidney appears to be protected. Therefore, it is concluded that agent-characteristics of RAAS intervention (i.e., antiproteinuric properties) independently influence renal function loss in addition to its BP-lowering effect. Future studies should further explore the renoprotective benefit of non-antihypertensive intervention measures, alone and in combination with antihypertensive strategies.

Antihypertensive Agents↗