[Information about organ and tissue donation in colleges].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Liliane Joseph.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
PURPOSE: To expand the pool of suitable organ donors we developed an organ procurement program of non-heartbeating donors during the last 15 years. We compare graft survival in patients receiving renal transplants procured from non-heartbeating with recipients of kidneys from heartbeating donors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1986 to 1999, 60 renal transplantations were performed with kidneys harvested from non-heartbeating donors (Mastrich category IV). Kidneys were procured using a double balloon triple lumen catheter inserted into the femoral artery. The 60 kidneys were selected from 70 non-heartbeating donors based on age younger than 50 years, warm ischemia less than 30 minutes, creatinine less than 200 micromol./l., and no hypertension or major histological lesions. Long-term results of graft survival and complications were compared with a series of 1,065 renal transplantations performed during the same period with kidneys procured from heartbeating donors. RESULTS: Mean age of the recipients was statistically different as non-heartbeating donors were older. However, the 10-year graft survival rates were similar in both groups (50% versus 53%). Incidence of ureteral stenosis and fistula, arterial stenosis and thrombosis was not statistically different in both groups. On the other hand, delay graft function was more frequent in non-heartbeating donors (60% versus 40%, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Despite a high rate of acute tubular necrosis, kidneys harvested from non-heartbeating donors had the same graft survival rates as those procured from heartbeating donors. Surgical complications were not different. Transplantation of selected kidneys procured from non-heartbeating donors should be promoted as a response to organ shortage.
INTRODUCTION: The cold ischaemia time of a kidney before transplantation has a negative impact on the risk of acute tubular necrosis and graft survival. This cold ischaemia time can be reduced by a different organization of harvesting, organ distribution and transplantation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventy nine organ donor case files from the same hospital were reviewed from reception of the donor until transplantation. 135 renal transplantations, including 60 kidneys and 14 kidney-pancreas transplants were performed on site with organs harvested from these donors. The various phases of harvesting were studied: reception and resuscitation of the patient took 30 hours, and the diagnosis of brain death, information of the families and transfer of the donor to the operating room for harvesting took 11 hours. RESULTS: The mean cold ischaemia time was 6 hours when kidney-pancreas transplantation was performed and 22 hours 30 minutes for isolated local renal transplantation. The decisive factor is the time required to obtain HLA typing, which is only performed during organ harvesting for isolated renal transplantation. HLA typing and lymph node sampling in the intensive care unit would save 7 hours. CONCLUSION: The authors recommend that HLA typing and lymph node sampling for cross matches be performed in the intensive care unit in order to reduce the cold ischaemia time.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.