Biomedical subjects

Linda Bloomfield

Publications and source records attributed to Linda Bloomfield.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

A qualitative study exploring the experiences and views of mothers, health visitors and family support centre workers on the challenges and difficulties of parenting.

Successive policy documents have referred to the need to support parents as an approach to reducing social exclusion, behaviour problems among young people and crime rates. Much of the rhetoric focuses on professional intervention, and there is less attention paid to the views and experiences of parents themselves. The present study explores the experiences and views of mothers, health visitors and family support centre workers who work with parents on the challenges and difficulties of parenting children under the age of 6 years. It provides an appreciation of their views on effective parenting and how parents can be helped to feel more effective in the parenting role. Focus groups, which were exploratory and interactive in form, were conducted across three primary care trusts in Hertfordshire, UK. Three samples were purposively selected in order to examine the range and diversity of experiences and views about parenting, and included the parents of children up to the age of 6 years, health visitors and family support centre workers. The mothers were those waiting to attend a parenting programme, and included first-time mothers and those with more than one child. The health visitors and family support workers had a range of experience in working with parents and children, and included those who were facilitating parenting programmes and those who were not. A number of themes emerged surrounding the challenges and difficulties of parenting and effective parenting, including expectations of others, establishing routines, play, behavioural issues and discipline, empathy, and communication. Similar themes emerged from all groups; however, there were qualitative differences between parents and professionals in the way in which these issues were expressed. Key statements from the parent focus groups have been developed into self-efficacy statements, which will be used as input to the development of a tool to measure the effectiveness of parenting programmes.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Developing and validating a tool to measure parenting self-efficacy.

AIMS: This paper reports the development of a tool to measure parenting self-efficacy as an aid to evaluating parenting programmes. BACKGROUND: Whilst there has been increasing interest in parenting programmes from parents, government and professionals, there is a lack of rigorous evaluation studies of their effectiveness, particularly their longer-term outcomes. Equally, there is little research evidence of the views and experiences of parents themselves. It is important to develop robust outcome measures which draw on well-developed theoretical constructs to measure parents' perceived abilities to manage their children based on their own views and experiences. Self-efficacy, a self-perception of one's ability to perform competently and effectively in a particular task or setting, may provide such a framework. METHODS: Data from 12 focus groups conducted with parents and parenting programme facilitators informed the development of the tool. A thematic analysis of the focus group transcripts identified key items to be included in the self-efficacy instrument, and these were developed into 82 Likert-format statements. A multi-method approach was used to test the instrument for validity and reliability. FINDINGS: Nine domain specific sub-scales of parenting were identified from the analysis of the focus group data. Internal reliability coefficients for the subscales ranged from 0.80 to 0.89, and the overall scale reliability was 0.94. External reliability coefficients ranged from rs = 0.58 (n = 19, P < 0.01) to rs = 0.88 (n = 19, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: A valid and reliable tool to measure parenting self-efficacy has been developed, which will aid evaluation of parenting programmes.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

A qualitative study exploring junior paediatricians', midwives', GPs' and mothers' experiences and views of the examination of the newborn baby.

OBJECTIVE: to explore the experiences and attitudes of midwives, junior paediatricians (SHOs), GPs, and mothers to the examination of the newborn baby. To provide an appreciation of their views on several issues, in particular the purpose and value of the examination, who is thought to be appropriate to carry it out and when and where it should take place. DESIGN: qualitative using semi-structured interviews, which were exploratory and interactive, in order to examine the range and diversity of experiences and attitudes to the neonatal examination. SETTING: South-east England. PARTICIPANTS: four samples were purposefully selected to include ten each of midwives, SHOs, GPs and recently delivered mothers. SHOs were currently working in paediatric departments of a district general hospital or teaching hospital and their experience of conducting examinations of the newborn baby ranged from several months to several years. Midwives included both those trained in the examination and currently conducting examinations, and those not so trained and not carrying out the examination. Most of the midwives had been qualified for over ten years and had a wide range of clinical experience in hospital and community settings. The GPs were from ten practices in two Health Authorities and all had some experience of conducting neonatal examinations. Of the mothers, a few had had their babies examined at home by midwives, others in hospital by an SHO. Mothers included those with a family history of problems relevant to the examination, those with previous pregnancy complications and others with no problems or complications. Some were first-time mothers. FINDINGS: all groups perceived the examination to be a useful screening tool providing reassurance to parents. They considered both midwives and SHOs to be appropriate professionals to carry out the examination, if adequately trained. Most thought that midwives have a better rapport with mothers, are able to provide continuity of care and more often discuss health-care issues than do SHOs. Few SHOs reported receiving any formal training in the examination of the newborn baby. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: the extension of the practice of midwives examining the newborn baby following relevant training would be acceptable to all stakeholders. The implications of increased demands on the midwives' workload may need to be considered.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

A qualitative study exploring midwives' perceptions and views of extending their role to the examination of the newborn baby.

OBJECTIVES: to explore midwives' attitudes and perceptions about extending their role to the examination of the newborn baby, as well as their general perceptions and attitudes to new role developments. DESIGN: qualitative, data collected using semi-structured interviews, which were exploratory and interactive in form. SETTING: six maternity hospitals in South-east England. PARTICIPANTS: ten midwives were purposefully selected, including five trained in the examination of the newborn baby and currently conducting examinations and five who had not. Most of the midwives had been qualified for over ten years and had a wide range of clinical experience in hospital and community settings. FINDINGS: midwives identified many benefits to themselves, to their profession and to the mothers as a result of developing their role into the examination of the newborn baby. The major benefit cited was improved job satisfaction, which was directly related to their ability to give continuity and total care to mothers and babies. Midwives also perceived that undertaking the examination strengthened their position as autonomous practitioners, by enabling them to provide total care to mothers and babies who fitted their criteria of normality. Moreover, midwives thought that improvements in the overall quality of care to mothers would result from them performing the examination, including improved communication, greater continuity of care and a more holistic examination. Although midwives were concerned about possible increase in workloads and pressure to take on new roles, the examination was generally perceived as being easily incorporated into their current practice without compromising overall standards in midwifery care. Midwives expressed concern about 'extending' practice into areas that did not fit their perceptions of normality and about being 'pressurised' into taking on new roles. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: it would appear from this study that an important consideration for midwives in their acceptance of new roles, is the relationship of that role to their position as experts in normality. Midwives in this study viewed the examination of the newborn baby as 'fitting in' with their perceptions of the core values of midwifery.

Adult↗