Biomedical subjects
Linda J Heffner
Publications and source records attributed to Linda J Heffner.
Advanced maternal age--how old is too old?
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The downside of cesarean delivery: short- and long-term complications.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Should older women have antepartum testing to prevent unexplained stillbirth?
OBJECTIVE: Older women are at an increased risk for unexplained stillbirth late in pregnancy. The purpose of this study was to compare 3 strategies for the prevention of unexplained fetal death in women aged 35 years and older. We compared usual care (no antepartum testing or induction before 41 weeks), weekly testing at 37 weeks with induction after a positive test, and no testing with induction at 41 weeks. METHOD: We used a Markov model to quantify the risks and benefits of each strategy in terms of the number of antepartum tests, inductions, and additional cesarean deliveries per fetal death averted. Probability data used in the model were derived from obstetrical databases and the literature. RESULTS: Without a strategy of antepartum surveillance between 37 and 41 weeks, women aged 35 years and older would experience 5.2 unexplained fetal deaths per 1,000 pregnancies. For nulliparous women 35 and older, weekly antepartum testing initiated at 37 weeks would avert 3.9 fetal deaths per 1,000 pregnancies but would require 863 antepartum tests, 71 inductions, and 14 additional cesarean deliveries per fetal death averted. A strategy of no testing but induction at 41 weeks would avert 0.9 fetal deaths per 1,000 pregnancies and require 469 inductions and 219 additional cesareans per fetal death averted. CONCLUSION: A strategy of antepartum testing in older women would reduce the number of unexplained stillbirths at term and would result in fewer inductions and cesareans per fetal death averted than a strategy of no antepartum testing but induction at 41 weeks.
Effect of prenatal diagnosis on outcomes in D-transposition of the great arteries.
BACKGROUND: By decreasing preoperative morbidity, prenatal diagnosis could improve neurodevelopmental outcomes in infants with critical congenital heart disease. We explored the impact of prenatal diagnosis on perinatal and perioperative variables and on outcomes at 1 year of age. METHODS: We analyzed a database of children enrolled in prospective studies on surgical support techniques from 1988 to 2000. Selection criteria included a diagnosis of D-transposition of the great arteries with intact ventricular septum or ventricular septal defect, no extracardiac congenital anomalies, birth weight >2.3 kg, and repair by arterial switch procedure. RESULTS: Of 346 patients at enrollment, 25 had a prenatal diagnosis, and 321 did not. Children with prenatal diagnosis, compared with those without, had a lower likelihood of birth by spontaneous labor, lower birth weights, lower Apgar 5 scores, a higher rate of preoperative endotracheal intubation, and surgery at a younger age. They tended to have a lower incidence of fetal distress during labor. At 1 year of age, 272 patients were tested with the Psychomotor Development Index and Mental Development Index of the Bayley Scales. Mean z scores were similar in those with and without prenatal diagnosis for both Psychomotor Development Index (-0.92 +/- 0.93 vs -0.88 +/- 1.05) and Mental Development Index (-0.29 +/- 1.13 vs -0.41 +/- 0.93). CONCLUSIONS: Infants with D-transposition of the great arteries with and without prenatal diagnosis differed with respect to perinatal and perioperative variables, but their development at 1 year of age was similar. Future studies should include a greater number of children with prenatal diagnosis and a variety of congenital heart lesions.
Persistent fetal occiput posterior position: obstetric outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the obstetric outcomes associated with persistent occiput posterior position of the fetal head in term laboring patients. METHODS: We performed a cohort study of 6434 consecutive, term, vertex, laboring nulliparous and multiparous patients, comparing those who delivered infants in the occiput posterior position with those who delivered in the occiput anterior position. We examined maternal demographics, labor and delivery characteristics, and maternal and neonatal outcomes. RESULTS: The prevalence of persistent occiput posterior position at delivery was 5.5% overall, 7.2% in nulliparas, and 4.0% in multiparas (P <.001). Persistent occiput posterior position was associated with shorter maternal stature and prior cesarean delivery. During labor and delivery, the occiput posterior position was associated with prolonged first and second stages of labor, oxytocin augmentation, use of epidural analgesia, chorioamnionitis, assisted vaginal delivery, third and fourth degree perineal lacerations, cesarean delivery, excessive blood loss, and postpartum infection. Newborns had lower 1-minute Apgar scores, but showed no differences in 5-minute Apgar scores, gestational age, or birth weight. CONCLUSION: Persistent occiput posterior position is associated with a higher rate of complications during labor and delivery. In our population, the chances that a laboring woman with persistent occiput posterior position will have a spontaneous vaginal delivery are only 26% for nulliparas and 57% for multiparas.
Impact of labor induction, gestational age, and maternal age on cesarean delivery rates.
OBJECTIVE: To quantify the impact of labor induction and maternal age on cesarean delivery rates in nulliparous and multiparous women between 36 and 42 weeks' gestation. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study on 14,409 women delivering at two teaching hospitals in metropolitan Boston during 1998 and 1999. Women who had contraindications to labor, including a prior cesarean delivery, were excluded. The risks for cesarean delivery by induction status, gestational age by completed week between 36 and 42 weeks, maternal age <35, 35-39, and >/=40 years, and stratified by parity, were calculated by logistic regression. RESULTS: In nulliparas, labor induction was associated with an increase in cesarean delivery from 13.7% to 24.7% (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.70; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.48, 1.95]). In multiparas, induction was associated with an increase from 2.4% to 4.5% (OR 1.49; 95% CI 1.10, 2.00). Other variables that placed a nulliparous woman at increased risk for cesarean delivery included maternal age of at least 35 years and gestational ages over 40 weeks. For multiparas, only maternal age 40 years or older and gestational age of 41 weeks were associated with an increase in cesarean deliveries. CONCLUSION: Induction of labor, older maternal age, and gestational age over 40 weeks each independently increase the risk for cesarean delivery in both nulliparous and multiparous women. Although the relative risk from induction is similar in nulliparas and multiparas, the absolute magnitude of the increase is much greater in nulliparas (11% versus 2.1%).
Uterine rupture among women with a prior cesarean delivery.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Perinatal outcome after preterm premature rupture of membranes with in situ cervical cerclage.
OBJECTIVE: The presence of a cervical cerclage at the time of preterm premature rupture of membranes (pPROM) could promote clinically evident infection and adverse pregnancy outcome. This cohort study examines whether the presence of cerclage at the time of pPROM is associated with increased maternal or neonatal inflammatory morbidity. STUDY DESIGN: All singleton pregnancies with cerclage and pPROM between 24.0 and 33.9 weeks' gestation at our institution (January 1985-December 1997) were reviewed. Controls (pPROM without cerclage) were matched 2.5:1 by year of presentation. Outcome measures suggest clinical evidence of an infectious response and include maternal admission white blood cell count, time to onset of preterm labor, clinical chorioamnionitis, postpartum fever, neonatal white-matter disease (intraventricular hemorrhage or periventricular leukomalacia) at less than 33 weeks, neonatal sepsis, and neonatal death. RESULTS: One hundred fourteen cases of pPROM and cerclage were matched with 288 controls. The study had power (alpha =.05, power = 0.8) to detect a two-fold difference in incidence of adverse neonatal outcome. Among the mothers, the incidence of clinical chorioamnionitis (14.0% vs 18.8%, P =.26), uterine activity at admission (33.3% vs 32.2%, P =.44), maternal postpartum fever (7.9% vs 7.6%, P =.93) in cerclage versus no cerclage were equivalent. Among the neonates, the incidence of neonatal white- matter disease (15.3% vs 13.7%, P =.75), neonatal sepsis (9.1% vs 6.0%, P =.21), and neonatal death were similar. CONCLUSION: Rates of maternal and neonatal morbidity were similar between both groups. The close overall similarity between the groups strongly suggest clinically insignificant differences between the two groups. These data indicate that a cervical cerclage at the time of pPROM less than 34 weeks does not adversely affect pregnancy outcome.