Biomedical subjects

Lisa Berger

Publications and source records attributed to Lisa Berger.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Recruiting and retaining participants in a combined behavioral and pharmacological clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: This article focuses on the practical and methodological considerations that went into recruiting and retaining participants in a complex clinical trial. It describes multiple recruitment strategies that were employed to meet stringent eligibility criteria and manage efficiently the flow of participants to fulfill recruitment goals. Both study-wide and site-specific methods that were employed to maximize retention rates are discussed. Also discussed is how the coordinating center worked together with study investigators to improve recruitment and retention. METHOD: A multidimensional perspective on recruitment and retention is discussed. Details are provided on how barriers to recruitment and retention were addressed. Intervention strategies designed by the coordinating center to meet performance goals are described. Data are presented to support the utility of recruitment and retention methods. The COMBINE Study served as a case illustration for various issues addressed in the article. RESULTS: As a result of the combined efforts of the coordinating center and study sites, there was steady improvement in recruitment and retention rates over the course of the trial. The recruitment goal of 1,375 participants was surpassed by September 2003. Also, improvement in data completeness rates improved by 18-27 percentage points over a 3-year period, culminating in follow-up rates meeting or exceeding performance goals by 2004. CONCLUSIONS: Various strategies and procedures designed to address recruitment and retention problems in large, complex combination pharmacotherapy and behavioral trials were effective in meeting recruitment and retention goals. The lessons learned may be of value to investigators not only involved in multisite, combination trials but in monotherapy and/or single-site studies as well.

Advertising↗

PubMed2005

Late recognition of SARS in nosocomial outbreak, Toronto.

Late recognition of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) was associated with no known SARS contact, hospitalization before the nosocomial outbreak was recognized, symptom onset while hospitalized, wards with SARS clusters, and postoperative status. SARS is difficult to recognize in hospitalized patients with a variety of underlying conditions in the absence of epidemiologic links.

Aged↗

PubMed2004

Hospital preparedness and SARS.

On May 23, 2003, Toronto experienced the second phase of a severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) outbreak. Ninety cases were confirmed, and >620 potential cases were managed. More than 9,000 persons had contact with confirmed or potential case-patients; many required quarantine. The main hospital involved during the second outbreak was North York General Hospital. We review this hospital's response to, and management of, this outbreak, including such factors as building preparation and engineering, personnel, departmental workload, policies and documentation, infection control, personal protective equipment, training and education, public health, management and administration, follow-up of SARS patients, and psychological and psychosocial management and research. We also make recommendations for other institutions to prepare for future outbreaks, regardless of their origin.

Canada↗

PubMed2002

Immediate neurocognitive effects of concussion.

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively measure the immediate neurocognitive effects and early course of recovery from concussion and to examine the effects of loss of consciousness (LOC) and posttraumatic amnesia (PTA) on the severity of neurocognitive impairment immediately after concussion. METHODS: A sports-related concussion research model was used to allow prospective immediate evaluation of concussion. A total of 2385 high school and college football players were studied. Ninety-one players (3.8%) sustained concussions during the study. A brief neurocognitive and neurological screening measure, the Standardized Assessment of Concussion, was used to assess cognitive functioning before the football season, immediately after injury, and 15 minutes, 48 hours, and 90 days after injury. RESULTS: Standardized Assessment of Concussion scores immediately after concussion were significantly lower than the preseason baseline score and the noninjured population baseline mean, even for injured subjects without LOC or PTA. Subjects with LOC were most severely impaired immediately after injury, whereas those without LOC or PTA were least impaired. Significant impairment was also detected 15 minutes after injury, but all three groups returned to baseline levels of cognitive functioning within 48 hours. CONCLUSION: These findings are the first to demonstrate not only that a gradient of increasing concussion severity is represented by PTA and LOC but also that measurable neurocognitive abnormalities are evident immediately after injury without PTA or LOC.

Adolescent↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Has the 80-hour work week increased faculty hours?

OBJECTIVE: The 80-hour work week has affected not only surgical residents but also faculty. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of resident hour restrictions on faculty hours and attitudes. DESIGN: Anonymous survey. SETTING: A single, large academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: All faculty in the Departments of Surgery, Neurosurgery, Orthopedics, and Otolaryngology. METHODS: Faculty were surveyed 6 months before and 6 months after the institution of the resident 80-hour work week. Surgeons detailed hours worked over 1 week and answered yes/no questions about changes in patient care and resident education. P values were determined by Chi-square tests or Student t-tests as appropriate. RESULTS: Of the 118 surveys distributed, 88 were returned (75%). Respondents were evenly divided between general surgeons (GS) and subspecialists (SS). Initially, 70% of faculty predicted that resident work-hour restrictions would increase faculty hours; however, only 47% of faculty felt that this had occurred. When current faculty work hours were compared with previously collected data, no differences were found. Faculty reported working an average of 69.9 +/- 12.2 hours per week this year, compared with 70.4 +/- 12.5 hours last year. When asked about the global impact of the 80-hour work week on faculty, 46% viewed the changes as harmful to the faculty. More concerning, 50% of all faculty felt the care their patients received was worse than previously, with only 2% feeling patient care had improved. This perception was significantly more common among GS faculty (70% GS vs 37% SS; p < 0.01), 94% of whom felt that the current lack of continuity compromises patient care. When the data were stratified by faculty work hours, interesting differences are seen. Of those faculty with work weeks less than 60 hours, only 6% thought the changes were harmful to patients and 64% thought resident training had suffered. In contrast, of those faculty who worked greater than 80 hours per week, 56% thought patients were harmed (p = 0.03) and 100% thought training had suffered (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Faculty work hours have not increased in the 6 months after the institution of the 80-hour resident work week. However, the majority of the faculty feels that both patient care and resident education have deteriorated.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗