PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Lisa Summers

Publications and source records attributed to Lisa Summers.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Do birth certificate data accurately reflect the number of CNM-attended births? An exploratory study.

The number of midwife-attended births is increasing as reported on birth certificates in the United States. However, there is some evidence that births attended by certified nurse-midwives (CNMs) may not be accurately recorded. In this exploratory study, data on birth attendants for those clients giving birth during the study period were compared by using four sources: the client's hospital chart, the CNM birth log, hospital birth certificate records, and state vital statistics records. Researchers sought to determine the accuracy of birth attendant data as reflected in these four sources and whether other providers were listed as the birth attendant for actual CNM-attended births. During the study period, the CNM birth log showed that CNMs attended 97 vaginal births, whereas the client hospital charts for these same births noted 92 births as attended by CNMs (the other five were operative vaginal births). Hospital birth certificate and state vital statistics data during the study time period credited 88 and 82 of the client's births, respectively, to the CNMs. Exploration of the inaccurately reported birth attendant data, implications for practice, and recommendations for accurately recording birth certificate data are discussed.

Adult↗

Liability concerns: a view from the American College of Nurse-Midwives.

The national office of the American College of Nurse-Midwives (ACNM) is the center of day-to-day administration for the professional organization. Staff members respond to requests for information and assistance from certified nurse-midwives or certified midwives and facilitate the work of the Board, Divisions, and Committees. This article reviews the questions most frequently asked of the Professional Services department about risk management and professional liability issues and summarizes the most important lessons learned from the calls received. The focus is on 5 topic areas: 1) collaboration confusion, 2) systems needed to implement and effectively track diagnostic tests and referrals, 3) expansion of services beyond the core competencies, 4) patient satisfaction and patient complaints, and 5) maintaining medical malpractice coverage.

Cooperative Behavior↗

The National Practitioner Data Bank: information for and about midwifery.

The National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB), mandated by federal legislation in 1986, serves as a mechanism to protect the public from unsafe practitioners who attempt to avoid discovery of prior negligent behavior or malpractice record(s) by moving from state to state. Reporting to the NPDB about malpractice payments on behalf of nurse-midwives began in 1990. Reporting of providers excluded from Medicare and Medicaid program participation began in September 1999. Practitioners who were already in an excluded status at that time were reported. Reports of adverse action against a nurse-midwife can be submitted to the NPDB by a state licensure board, a governmental agency, hospitals, health maintenance organizations, or other health care organizations. Reporting of licensing actions and clinical privilege actions are not required, although these may be voluntarily reported. The NPDB received 484 reports about nurse-midwives from September 1, 1999, to March 31, 2005. Of the 484 reports, 375 have an obstetric malpractice code. The median claim payment made on behalf of nurse-midwives during this period is 225,000 dollars. Although limited, the NPDB is the only systematic national source of nurse-midwifery malpractice data collection.

Confidentiality↗