PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Lisa Wills-Frank

Publications and source records attributed to Lisa Wills-Frank.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Assisted primary screening using the automated ThinPrep Imaging System.

We report the clinical trial studies for the ThinPrep Imaging System (TIS; Cytyc, Boxborough, MA). Between December 2000 and July 2001, 10,742 ThinPrep specimens were collected at 4 US clinical sites representative of the normal clinical population of the laboratories, including screening patients and referred patients. After nonstudy screening diagnoses were completed, the vials were relabeled and randomized, and study slides were prepared and stained. TIS-trained cytotechnologists and pathologists screened the slides twice, first manually, then TIS-assisted after an appropriate interval. Afterward, 3 independent pathologists performed an adjudication study to determine definitive diagnoses for the nonnegative slides and 5% of the negative slides; the adjudicated diagnoses served as the "gold standard" for subsequent sensitivity and specificity analyses. TIS-assisted screening was statistically more sensitive than manual screening for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) or higher (+) and statistically equivalent for low- (LSIL)+ and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL)+ diagnoses. TIS-assisted screening had equivalent specificity for ASCUS+ and LSIL+ and significantly higher specificity for HSIL+. Average cytologists' daily screening rates doubled with TIS-assisted screening. The sensitivity of the TIS-assisted screening system equals or exceeds the sensitivity of manual primary screening without adversely affecting specificity, and TIS-assisted screening can improve cervical cancer screening productivity. Cost issues require further study.

Female↗

Atypical squamous cells as a diagnostic pitfall in pulmonary Wegener's granulomatosis. A case report.

BACKGROUND: Wegener's granulomatosis (WG) is characterized by systemic, necrotizing, granulomatous inflammation accompanied by vasculitis. It classically involves the triad of the upper respiratory tract, lungs and kidneys. Isolated pulmonary lesions of WG may present in some patients as pulmonary masses, simulating neoplasms. The features of WG can be suggested by cytologic study. Atypical epithelial cells associated with WG have previously been reported as a cause of a false positive diagnosis of bronchoalveolar carcinoma. CASE: In this case the cytologic findings included atypical squamous cells in a background of acute, chronic and granulomatous inflammation. In several respiratory specimens the atypical squamous cells were incorrectly interpreted as diagnostic of squamous cell carcinoma. The correct diagnosis of WG was confirmed with open lung biopsy, which demonstrated necrotizing granulomatous inflammation with geographic necrosis and associated vasculitis. CONCLUSION: Markedly atypical squamous cells mimicking squamous cell carcinoma can be found accompanying the inflammatory process associated with WG and are a possible diagnostic pitfall. The possibility of WG as well as other inflammatory processes should always be considered in the differential diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma of the lung. This case is the only reported case of WG in which atypical squamous cells were a diagnostic pitfall, initially suggesting a diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma.

Adult↗