PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Lisette Schoonhoven

Publications and source records attributed to Lisette Schoonhoven.

14 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

The impact of home parenteral nutrition on daily life-a review.

BACKGROUND: Total parenteral nutrition (TPN) is a lifesaving therapy in patients with severe intestinal failure that can be administered at home. However, patients have to face complex technological nutritional support issues at home, which will influence their personal life. OBJECTIVES: This review aims to describe the implications of home parenteral nutrition (HPN) on the quality of life, as experienced by patients, as well as to describe the caregiver's reactions regarding these notions. SEARCH STRATEGY: A systematic review of the literature published between 1965 and 2005 was conducted. Cinahl, Medline, and Psychlit databases were searched. Systematic data extraction and narrative data synthesis were performed. SELECTION CRITERIA: Papers were included if they described original research published in a peer reviewed journal, with a focus on adult patients on HPN and/or their family caregivers. DATA COLLECTION (AND ANALYSIS): A standardised record was used for data extraction. MAIN RESULTS: A total of 26 studies were included. The quality of life reported by patients was moderate to good, but psychological problems, e.g. depression and anxiety, were common. Social life was disturbed due to the venous access device, the time schedule for HPN administration, the inability to have normal oral intake, gastrointestinal mobility problems, and physical complaints. Frequently mentioned somatic problems included fatigue, diarrhoea, pain, polyuria during infusion and sleep disruption. Despite social restrictions, depression and fatigue, caregivers reported their overall QoL as similar to the norms for healthy populations. CONCLUSION: Patients on HPN meet a broad range of problems. Apart from the well-known metabolic and infectious complications, many of these are psychological or social in nature.

Caregivers↗
PubMed2006

Performance evaluation of arterial femoral sheath removal by registered nurses after PCI.

BACKGROUND: Sheath removal after PCI by registered nurses can improve patients' comfort and shorten immobilisation time. As sheath removal is not without risk, it is important to assure the quality of performance. AIMS: The aim was (a) to check if nurses' performance in 1999 and 2005 was in accordance with the protocol for arterial sheath removal and (b) to compare both measurements to explore differences in performance over time. METHODS: We trained registered nurses in sheath removal and observed them during sheath removal in elective uncomplicated PCI-patients. We developed and used a checklist, including 10 elements and 65 items. RESULTS: Both in 1999 (n=43 observations with 13 nurses) and 2005 (n=42 observations with 16 nurses) the norm of more than 90% for the total score was not achieved: we found 82% and 80%, respectively. Four elements scored more than 90%, and three elements scored less than 80% at both points in time. The results on the other three elements differed significantly over time. CONCLUSION: Registered nurses achieved the norm for good performance (80-89%) of removing arterial sheaths according to protocol after a training programme and this is stable in time. Since the norm for excellent performance (> or =90%) was not achieved, current performance could be improved, e.g. by yearly repetition of training and observation of skills. More research is needed, and could focus on the validation of the instrument. Also multi-centre studies with this checklist could test the association between the quality of arterial femoral sheath removal and the occurrence of vascular complications.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

The prevalence and incidence of pressure ulcers in hospitalised patients in the Netherlands: a prospective inception cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Pressure ulcers frequently occur in hospitalised patients. The prevalence of pressure ulcers grade 2 or worse varies from 3% to 12% in hospitalised patients. Incidence figures are not frequently reported. While incidence and prevalence are both measures of disease frequency, they provide different perspectives on pressure ulcers. OBJECTIVES: To describe the incidence rate and prevalence of pressure ulcers in hospitalised patients. DESIGN: Prospective inception cohort study. SETTING: Two large hospitals, one general (530-beds) and one teaching (1042-beds), in The Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: A non-selected, though not strictly random, sample of 1536 patients was eligible for inclusion in the study. One thousand four hundred and thirty one patients (93.2%) consented to participate. Eventually, 1229 patients (80%) had a complete follow-up. The sample consisted of patients admitted to the surgical, internal, neurological and geriatric wards for more than 5 days between January 1999 and June 2000. METHODS: Follow-up once a week until pressure ulcer occurrence, discharge or length of stay over 12 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Occurrence of a pressure ulcer grade 2 or worse during admission to hospital, according to the classification of the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty four patients developed 172 pressure ulcers during follow-up. The overall weekly incidence rate was 0.06 per week (95% confidence interval 0.05-0.07 per week). Highest rates were observed for surgical patients and lowest for geriatric and neurologic patients (0.08 and 0.02, respectively). The week specific prevalence varied between 12.8% and 20.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients hospitalised for more than 5 days overall one may expect 6% per week to develop pressure ulcers. It would appear that any preventive measures can only be effective if taken timely. Accordingly, preventive measures should be considered early, because pressure ulcers were observed already within the first week of admission.

Cohort Studies↗
PubMed2006

Reliability of the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel classification system.

AIM: This paper reports a study examining the interrater and intrarater reliability of classifying pressure ulcers according to the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel classification system when using photographs of pressure ulcers and incontinence lesions. BACKGROUND: Pressure ulcer classification is an essential tool for assessing ulcers and their severity and determining which preventive or therapeutic action is needed. Many classification systems are described in the literature. There are only a limited number of studies that evaluate the interrater reliability of pressure ulcer grading scales. The intrarater reliability is seldom studied. METHODS: The study consisted of two phases. In the first phase 56 photographs, together with a random selection of nine photographs from the same set, were presented to 473 nurses. In the second phase, the 56 photographs were presented twice to 86 other nurses with an interval of one month and in a different order. All the nurses were familiar with the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel classification. They did not receive any additional training on classification, and were asked to classify the lesions as normal skin, blanchable erythema, pressure ulcers (four grades, European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel classification) or incontinence lesions. RESULTS: In the first phase, the multirater-Kappa for the 473 participating nurses was 0.37 (P < 0.001). Non-blanchable erythema was often confused with blanchable erythema and incontinence lesions. Also incontinence lesions were frequently not correctly classified. The intrarater agreement was low (kappa = 0.38). In the second phase, the interrater agreement was not significantly different in both sessions. The intrarater agreement was 0.52. CONCLUSION: Both the interrater and intrarater reliability of the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel classification of lesion photographs by nurses was very low. Differentiation between pressure ulcers and incontinence lesions seems to be difficult.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Implementation of a new policy results in a decrease of pressure ulcer frequency.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of a new policy on the efficiency of pressure ulcer care. DESIGN: Series of 1-day pressure ulcer surveys before and after the implementation. SETTING: A 900-bed University Medical Centre in The Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: On the days of the surveys, 657 patients were included before the implementation, 735 patients at 4 months after the implementation, and 755 patients at 11 months after the implementation. INTERVENTION: Implementation of a hospital guideline for pressure ulcer care combined with the introduction of viscoelastic foam mattresses on the efficiency of the prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Comparisons before versus after the implementation were made regarding the care behaviour of nurses and the frequency of patients with pressure ulcer. RESULTS: Inadequate prevention decreased from 19 to 4% after 4 months and to 6% after 11 months (P < 0.001), and inadequate treatment decreased from 60 to 31% (P = 0.005). Excluding the use of mattresses as a positive indicator for care behaviour, we found no significant increase in adequate care to prevent pressure ulcers. Also, in adequate treatment activities, we found no significant difference. Overall, we found a significant decrease in hospital-acquired pressure ulcer frequency from 18 to 13% (P = 0.003) after 4 months and 11% (P < 0.001) after 11 months. CONCLUSION: The number of pressure ulcer patients in hospital can successfully be reduced. General measures such as the introduction of adequate mattresses and guidelines for prevention and treatment are promising tools in this respect.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Impact of long-term HPN on daily life in adults.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Home parenteral nutrition (HPN) is a therapy that changes life radically and often means lifelong dependence on parenteral feeding. The aim of this study was to gain insight into problems experienced by adult patients who were dependent on long-term HPN. METHODS: A survey was performed on all patients at the ambulatory care clinics of two university centres. We used two techniques: written questionnaires and interviews. The questionnaires addressed fatigue (CIS), quality of sleep, anxiety, depression (BDI), social impairment (subscale SIP68), and sexual functioning. Data were analysed descriptively. Structured interviews inquired about the negative influence of HPN dependence on daily life. These data were quantified by content analysis. RESULTS: The response rate was 76% (n = 48). Questionnaire results: all the respondents had multiple physical symptoms, which they attributed to the underlying disease. Furthermore, severe fatigue (63%), sleeping disorders, (severe) depression (65%), social impairment (55%), and sexual disorders (33%) were present. Quality of life (QoL) correlated with fatigue, sleeping disorders, anxiety, depression, and social impairment (P<0.02). Interview results: psychosocial problems were the main complaints in daily life due to HPN dependence, e.g. negative changes in moods and feelings (including anxiety), lack of freedom, limitations in social life and being dependent. CONCLUSIONS: Although many somatic symptoms were present, HPN-dependent patients reported primarily psychosocial problems in daily life. To improve QoL, HPN teams should assess somatic as well as psychosocial aspects standard. Given the large proportion of patients with depressive disorders, therapies such as anti-depressant medication, psychosocial support and cognitive training, should be offered.

Ambulatory Care Facilities↗
PubMed2005

Predicting pressure ulcers: cases missed using a new clinical prediction rule.

AIM: The aim of this paper is to report a study describing patients with pressure ulcers that were incorrectly classified as 'not at risk' by the prediction rule and comparing them with patients who were correctly classified as 'not at risk'. BACKGROUND: Patients admitted to hospital are at risk of developing pressure ulcers. Although the majority of pressure ulcers can be predicted using a recently developed prediction rule, up to 30% of patients with pressure ulcers may still be misclassified. METHODS: Between January 1999 and June 2000 a prospective cohort study was conducted in two large hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients admitted to neurology, internal, surgical, and elder care wards for more than 5 days were included (n = 1229), and were examined weekly. Information on potential prognostic determinants for pressure ulcers mentioned in the literature was recorded. Outcome was defined as occurrence of a pressure ulcer grade 2 or worse during hospital admission. RESULTS: Patients who developed pressure ulcers experienced more problems with 'friction and shear' and underwent surgery more often and longer. Also, they were more often admitted because of malignant conditions. CONCLUSION: We found no specific characteristics that clearly distinguished patients with pressure ulcers that were incorrectly classified as 'not at risk' by the prediction rule from patients who were correctly classified as 'not at risk'. It appears difficult to improve further on the prediction of pressure ulcers using available clinical information.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Inter-rater reliability of the EPUAP pressure ulcer classification system using photographs.

BACKGROUND: Many classification systems for grading pressure ulcers are discussed in the literature. Correct identification and classification of a pressure ulcer is important for accurate reporting of the magnitude of the problem, and for timely prevention. The reliability of pressure ulcer classification systems has rarely been tested. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this paper is to examine the inter-rater reliability of classifying pressure ulcers according to the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel classification system when using pressure ulcer photographs. DESIGN: Survey was among pressure ulcer experts. METHODS: Fifty-six photographs were presented to 44 pressure ulcer experts. The experts classified the lesions as normal skin, blanchable erythema, pressure ulcer (four grades) or incontinence lesion. Inter-rater reliability was calculated. RESULTS: The multirater-Kappa for the entire group of experts was 0.80 (P < 0.001). Various groups of experts obtained comparable results. Differences in classifications are mainly limited to 1 degree of difference. Incontinence lesions are most often confused with grade 2 (blisters) and grade 3 pressure ulcers (superficial pressure ulcers). CONCLUSIONS: The inter-rater reliability of the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel classification appears to be good for the assessment of photographs by experts. The difference between an incontinence lesion and a blister or a superficial pressure ulcer does not always seem clear. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The ability to determine correctly whether a lesion is a pressure ulcer lesion is important to assess the effectiveness of preventive measures. In addition, the ability to make a correct distinction between pressure ulcers and incontinence lesions is important as they require different preventive measures. A faulty classification leads to mistaken measures and negative results. Photographs can be used as a practice instrument to learn to discern pressure ulcers from incontinence lesions and to get to know the different grades of pressure ulcers. The Pressure Ulcer Classification software package has been developed to facilitate learning.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Prospective cohort study of routine use of risk assessment scales for prediction of pressure ulcers.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether risk assessment scales can be used to identify patients who are likely to get pressure ulcers. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Two large hospitals in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: 1229 patients admitted to the surgical, internal, neurological, or geriatric wards between January 1999 and June 2000. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Occurrence of a pressure ulcer of grade 2 or worse while in hospital. RESULTS: 135 patients developed pressure ulcers during four weeks after admission. The weekly incidence of patients with pressure ulcers was 6.2% (95% confidence interval 5.2% to 7.2%). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.56 (0.51 to 0.61) for the Norton scale, 0.55 (0.49 to 0.60) for the Braden scale, and 0.61 (0.56 to 0.66) for the Waterlow scale; the areas for the subpopulation, excluding patients who received preventive measures without developing pressure ulcers and excluding surgical patients, were 0.71 (0.65 to 0.77), 0.71 (0.64 to 0.78), and 0.68 (0.61 to 0.74), respectively. In this subpopulation, using the recommended cut-off points, the positive predictive value was 7.0% for the Norton, 7.8% for the Braden, and 5.3% for the Waterlow scale. CONCLUSION: Although risk assessment scales predict the occurrence of pressure ulcers to some extent, routine use of these scales leads to inefficient use of preventive measures. An accurate risk assessment scale based on prospectively gathered data should be developed.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Incidence of pressure ulcers due to surgery.

Patients undergoing surgery are prone to develop pressure ulcers during the surgical procedure. The aim of the study was to gain insight into the problem by describing the incidence, clinical features and progression of pressure ulcers and closed pressure ulcers in patients undergoing surgery lasting more than 4 hours. A prospective follow-up study was conducted in a university hospital in the Netherlands. Two-hundred and eight patients from nine surgical specialities were included in the study. The skin of patients was observed the evening before surgery and, if the patient's condition allowed it, directly postoperatively and subsequently daily for 14 days or until discharge, whichever occurred first. When patients developed a pressure ulcer they were observed daily until discharge or until the pressure ulcer had healed. The size and colour of the lesion, stage and skin condition were described every day. In addition, data were collected concerning the operation, postoperative period, and general characteristics. Forty-four patients (21.2%) developed 70 pressure ulcers in the first 2 days following surgery. Twenty-one pressure ulcers deteriorated in the days following surgery. More than half (52.9%) of the lesions developed on the heels, and 15.7% developed in the sacral area. Twenty-five patients (12%) were impaired by the lesions they developed. None of the patients in the study developed closed pressure ulcers. Pressure ulcer development during a surgical procedure is a serious problem. Therefore, preventive measures should be taken during surgery and the first few days afterwards, until the patient is able to mobilize independently.

Female↗
PubMed2002

Risk indicators for pressure ulcers during surgery.

Patients undergoing surgery are prone to develop pressure ulcers during surgery. The aim of this study was to identify pressure ulcer risk indicators in patients undergoing surgery which lasted more than four hours. A prospective follow-up study was conducted in 208 patients. Data on presence or absence of pressure ulcers and risk indicators were collected preoperatively, during surgery, and postoperatively. The results show that of the many indicators recorded, the only predictor of pressure ulcers was length of surgery. Because it is not possible to influence the length of the surgery, prevention should primarily be aimed at decreasing pressure and shearing forces during surgery.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Problems experienced by patients receiving parenteral nutrition at home: results of an open interview study.

BACKGROUND: Home parenteral nutrition (HPN) is offered to patients who are unable to absorb sufficient nourishment from normal oral food intake or tube feeding. Major causes include severe motility disorders and limited resorption surface in the small intestine. HPN is a lifesaving therapy but has severe consequences on daily life. The aim of this study was to make an inventory of the problems experienced by patients receiving HPN. METHODS: Open interviews were held with 48 patients from the 2 major centers for HPN in the Netherlands, centered around the question: Which 3 HPN problems have the most severe impact on your daily life? Data were analyzed using content analysis. RESULTS: The respondents mentioned 7 central problems: negative emotions, physical problems, social limitations, dependence on others, incapability, complications, and patient-care provider problems. In addition, practical problems were mentioned: sleeping problems, financial problems, and the "hospital atmosphere" at home. The latter issues formed less of a problem for the patients. CONCLUSION: The main underlying elements in the lives of many HPN patients appeared to be loss, longing, and grief. In contrast, a smaller proportion of the patients expressed that they had clearly adapted to life with HPN. By means of the HPN, they were still alive and enjoying all the things they could still do.

Adult↗