Biomedical subjects

Lluis M Mir

Publications and source records attributed to Lluis M Mir.

20 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed2002

Vascular reactions to in vivo electroporation: characterization and consequences for drug and gene delivery.

In vivo electroporation (EP) is gaining momentum for drug and gene delivery. In particular, DNA transfer by EP to muscle tissue can lead to highly efficient long-term gene expression. We characterized a vascular effect of in vivo EP and its consequences for drug and gene delivery. Pulses of 10-20,000 micros and 0.1-1.6 kV/cm were applied over hind- and forelimb of mice and perfusion was examined by dye injection. The role of a sympathetically mediated vasoconstrictory reflex was investigated by pretreatment with reserpine. Expression of a transferred gene (luciferase), permeabilization (determined using (51)Cr-EDTA), membrane resealing and effects on perfusion were compared to assess the significance of the vascular effects. Above the permeabilization threshold, a sympathetically mediated Raynaud-like phenomenon with perfusion delays of 1-2 min was observed. Resolution of this phase followed kinetics of membrane resealing. Above a second threshold, irreversible permeabilization led to long perfusion delays. These vascular reactions (1) affect kinetics of drug delivery, (2) predict efficient DNA transfer, which is optimal during short perfusion delays, and (3) might explain electrocardiographic ST segment depressions after defibrillation as being caused by vascular effects of EP of cardiac muscle.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Mechanisms of in vivo DNA electrotransfer: respective contributions of cell electropermeabilization and DNA electrophoresis.

Efficient cell electrotransfection can be achieved using combinations of high-voltage (HV; 800 V/cm, 100 micros) and low-voltage (LV; 80 V/cm, 100 ms) pulses. We have developed equipment allowing the generation of various HV and LV combinations with precise control of the lag between the HV and LV pulses. We injected luciferase-encoding DNA in skeletal muscle, before or after pulse delivery, and measured luciferase expression after various pulse combinations. In parallel, we determined permeabilization levels using uptake of (51)Cr-labeled EDTA. High voltage alone resulted in a high level of muscle permeabilization for 300 seconds, but very low DNA transfer. Combinations of one HV pulse followed by one or four LV pulses did not prolong the high permeabilization level, but resulted in a large increase in DNA transfer for lags up to 100 seconds in the case of one HV + one LV and up to 3000 seconds in the case of one HV + four LV. DNA expression also reached similar levels when we injected the DNA between the HV and LV pulses. We conclude that the role of the HV pulse is limited to muscle cell permeabilization and that the LV pulses have a direct effect on DNA. In vivo DNA electrotransfer is thus a multistep process that includes DNA distribution, muscle permeabilization, and DNA electrophoresis.

Animals↗