PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Lois Wehren

Publications and source records attributed to Lois Wehren.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Gender differences in functioning after hip fracture.

BACKGROUND: Hip fracture is a significant health problem for men and women; between 25 and 30 percent of all hip fractures are sustained by men. Relatively little is known about gender differences in functional outcomes after hip fracture. The purpose of the current study is to compare post-hip fracture functional recovery of men and women. METHODS: A sample of 674 patients age 65 or older were recruited as part of the Baltimore Hip Studies and were followed longitudinally for 1 year following fracture. Information on prefracture status and hospital course of treatment was collected as well as functional data at baseline, 2, 6, and 12 months postfracture. Data were analyzed longitudinally using Generalized Estimating Equations (GEEs). RESULTS: Men in the study were generally younger and suffered greater comorbidity at time of fracture. Men further suffered higher mortality in the year following fracture. Among survivors, little difference between men and women was seen in patterns of recovery of function following fracture. CONCLUSIONS: Hip fracture is not a problem affecting just women. Recovery following fracture for men is probably no better than that for women, even after mortality differentially eliminates the frailest male participants. However, psychosocial factors, greater comorbidity, and higher rates of certain complications among men may require adjustments to interventions designed to restore function. Further research into the consequences of hip fracture for men and women is needed.

Activities of Daily Living↗

The Exercise Plus Program for older women post hip fracture: participant perspectives.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to explore the experiences of older women post hip fracture who were exposed to a motivational intervention, the Exercise Plus Program, intended to increase adherence to exercise. DESIGN AND METHODS: This study used a naturalistic inquiry. We interviewed a total of 70 older women, 12 months post hip fracture, using an interview guide asking about issues related to willingness to exercise. All interviews were tape recorded and transcribed verbatim. RESULTS: Analysis of the semi-structured interviews revealed 44 codes that were categorized and reduced to 14 major themes. Eleven of these themes focused on components that facilitated participation in exercise and included: (a) real and expected benefits; (b) visual cues and knowing what to do; (c) simplicity; (d) individualized care; (e) verbal encouragement to exercise; (f) regular schedule; (g) confidence (i.e., self-efficacy); (h) determination; (i) social support; (j) reciprocity; and (k) goal identification. The remaining three themes reflected what decreased the participants' willingness to exercise: (a) unpleasant sensations; (b) constraints to exercise; and (c) getting back to baseline. IMPLICATIONS: The findings provide some support for the benefit of the Exercise Plus Program. Lessons learned in the Exercise Plus Program can be translated to the development of other motivational interventions to help engage older adults in exercise, particularly those individuals who recently experienced an acute event, such as a hip fracture.

Aged↗

Changes in functional status attributable to hip fracture: a comparison of hip fracture patients to community-dwelling aged.

Disability attributable to hip fracture regarding activities of daily living was evaluated by comparing 594 hip fracture patients entering eight hospitals in Baltimore, Maryland, in 1990-1991 with community-dwelling aged from the Established Populations for Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly (EPESE) cohort matched on age, sex, and walking ability. Subjects were assessed at baseline (prefracture report for patients), 12 months, and 24 months. At baseline, 26% of both groups had walking disability, 12-14% had transferring disability, and 6-8% evidenced grooming disability. At 12 and 24 months, about 50% of hip fracture patients were walking disabled compared with 21-29% of EPESE respondents after the authors controlled for age, sex, comorbidities, and functional status (excess disability attributable to hip fracture, i.e., attributable disability, of 26 additional cases of disability per 100 persons in the hip fracture cohort during follow-up). Likewise, hip fracture patients experienced more disability regarding transferring (38-39% vs. 10-18%; attributable disability, approximately 22 cases per 100 persons) and grooming (17-19% vs. 7-15%; attributable disability, approximately six cases per 100 persons). Thus, results showed that hip fracture patients had substantially more activities of daily living disability than that explained by aging over 24 months.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Alendronate treatment for osteoporosis: a review of the evidence.

Alendronate, a bisphosphonate indicated for the management of osteoporosis, is an antiresorptive agent that directly inhibits osteoclast activity. It reduces bone turnover and increases spine and hip BMD. Equivalent effects on turnover and BMD have been reported with once-weekly dosing, using seven times the daily dose. Among 3658 women with osteoporosis enrolled in the Fracture Intervention Trial (FIT), there was a 53% reduction in hip fractures, a 48% reduction in morphometric vertebral fractures, a 45% reduction in clinical vertebral fractures, and a 30% reduction in all clinical fractures. Each of these differences was already statistically significant within 12 months of starting treatment. The drug is safe and well tolerated.

Journal Article↗

Health-related quality of life: is it a good indicator of function post THR?

The purpose of this study was to explore the impact of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measured with the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) on Functional Recovery Status (physical and psychosocial recovery status) at base-line, 2 months, 6 months, and 12 months following total hip replacement (THR). A secondary analysis was performed using data gathered from a sample of 271 older adults post THR. Four empirically based hypothesized models were tested. None of the models fit the data, with each having significant chi2 values and chi2 /df ratios greater than 3. Different dimensions of HRQOL at baseline, 2, 6, and 12 months were related to physical recovery status, and none of the 8 dimensions of the SF-36 was significantly related to psychosocial recovery status. Overall, the results of this study do not support the hypothesis that HRQOL, as measured by the SF-36, comprehensively explains functional recovery status following THR. Clinically, these findings may be applicable to individuals at risk for poor recovery. They also may prompt practitioners to consider alternative factors that influence psychosocial recovery.

Age Distribution↗

Reliability and validity of the self-efficacy and outcome expectations for osteoporosis medication adherence scales.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to test the reliability and validity of the self-efficacy and outcome expectations for osteoporosis medication adherence measures (SEOMA and OEOMA). DESIGN: This was a descriptive study involving a single face-to-face interview. SAMPLE: The study included 152 older adults with a mean age of 85.7 (+) 5.5 years, the majority of whom were Caucasian (99%), female (74%), and unmarried (75%). METHODS: In addition to the SEOMA and OEOMA measures, demographic information (age, gender, and marital status) and other health behaviors (exercise and osteoporosis medication use) were explored. RESULTS: There was evidence of reliability of the SEOMA and OEOMA based on internal consistency and R values. Evidence of the validity of the SEOMA and OEOMA measures was based on confirmatory factor analysis and hypothesis testing. CONCLUSION: This study is an important first step to developing reliable and valid measures of self-efficacy and outcome expectations for adherence to osteoporosis medications. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: The SEOMA and OEOMA can be used to evaluate self-efficacy and outcome expectancy beliefs related to osteoporosis medication use in older adults and interventions developed to strengthen those beliefs and improve medication adherence.

Aged↗