PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Lorna A Dawson

Publications and source records attributed to Lorna A Dawson.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Quantifying species composition in root mixtures using two methods: near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy and plant wax markers.

Understanding of plant interactions is greatly limited by our ability to identify and quantify roots belonging to different species. We proposed and compared two methods for estimating the root biomass proportion of each species in artificial mixtures: near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) and plant wax markers. Two sets of artificial root mixtures composed of two or three herbaceous species were prepared. The proportion of root material of each species in mixtures was estimated from NIRS spectral data (i) and the concentration patterns of n-alkanes (ii), n-alcohols (iii), and n-alkanes +n-alcohols combined (iv). For each data set, calibration equations were developed using multivariate statistical models. The botanical composition of root mixtures was predicted well for all the species considered. The accuracy varied slightly among methods: alkanes < alcohols = alkanes + alcohols < NIRS. Correlation coefficients between predicted and actual root proportions ranged from 0.89 to 0.99 for alkanes + alcohols predictions and from 0.97 to 0.99 for NIRS predictions. These two methods provide promising potential for understanding allocation patterns and competitive interactions.

Alkanes↗

The speed of soil carbon throughput in an upland grassland is increased by liming.

In situ (13)C pulse labelling was used to measure the temporal and spatial carbon flow through an upland grassland. The label was delivered as (13)C-CO(2) to vegetation in three replicate plots in each of two treatments: control and lime addition. Harvests occurred over a two month period and samples were taken along transects away from the label delivery area. The (13)C concentration of shoot, root, bulk soil, and soil-respired CO(2) was measured. There was no difference in the biomass and (13)C concentration of shoot and root material for the control and lime treatments meaning that the amount of (13)C-CO(2) assimilated by the vegetation and translocated below ground was the same in both treatments. The (13)C concentration of the bulk soil was lower in the lime treatment than in the control and, conversely, the (13)C concentration of the soil-respired CO(2) was higher in the lime. Unlike the difference in bulk soil (13)C concentration between treatments, the difference in the (13)C concentration of the soil-respired CO(2) was obvious only at the delivery site and primarily within 1 d after labelling. An observed increase in the abundance of mycorrhizal fungi in the lime treatment was a possible cause for this faster carbon throughput. The potential key role of mycorrhizas in the soil carbon cycle is discussed. The importance of a better understanding of soil processes, especially biological ones, in relation to the global carbon cycle and environmental change is highlighted.

Biological Transport↗