PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Louis M Wong Kee Song

Publications and source records attributed to Louis M Wong Kee Song.

7 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Frozen section analysis of esophageal endoscopic mucosal resection specimens in the real-time management of Barrett's esophagus.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess the validity of frozen section analysis of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) specimens from Barrett's esophagus as compared with permanent sections for the detection of neoplasia. Frozen sections help to give immediate feedback for surgical procedures. It has not been determined whether EMR can be adequately interpreted by using frozen sections to aid endoscopists in completely resecting neoplastic lesions. METHODS: EMR specimens from Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and/or carcinoma were tested by frozen section. Pathologists evaluated EMR specimens for the depth of invasion as well as the appearance of clear margins of resection. The kappa statistic was calculated to assess the degree of agreement between the frozen section and permanent section diagnoses. RESULTS: Twenty-three consecutive patients underwent 30 EMRs with frozen section diagnosis. Frozen section revealed a carcinoma in 7 specimens (23%) and dysplasia in 20 (66%). Permanent sections found carcinoma in 8 specimens (26%), dysplasia in 19 specimens (63%), and normal or nondysplastic Barrett's esophagus in the remainder. The kappa statistic for the depth of invasion of EMR specimens was 0.93 (near perfect agreement). The kappa statistic for the margins of the EMR specimens was 0.80 (excellent agreement). CONCLUSIONS: This study indicated that frozen section analysis of esophageal EMR specimens is valid as compared with permanent section. This technique might allow rapid evaluation about the degree and depth of involvement of cancers. This allows physicians to make decisions regarding further therapy if margins are involved or decrease the use of EMR for histologically benign-appearing lesions.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Endoscopic management of radiation-induced complete upper esophageal obstruction with an antegrade-retrograde rendezvous technique.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal strictures occur in 3% to 4% of patients with head and neck cancer who undergo radiation therapy. Some patients develop complete obstruction of the upper esophagus. Antegrade dilatation is often unsuccessful and many of these patients require surgery. OBJECTIVE: To describe the outcomes and complications of an endoscopic antegrade-retrograde rendezvous procedure to restore esophageal patency. DESIGN: Retrospective review of 8 cases treated with an endoscopic rendezvous procedure between August 2001 and April 2005. Medical records of consenting patients were abstracted for clinical history, procedural success, complications, and follow-up. SETTING: A large tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Eight patients with head and neck or upper esophageal cancer and complete upper esophageal obstruction from radiation stricturing who underwent an attempted rendezvous procedure. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Clinical procedural success, reported adverse events. RESULTS: Seven patients were men, and median age was 65 years. The median interval between radiation and the rendezvous procedure was 11 months. In 7 of 8 cases esophageal patency was restored and no major complications occurred. Two esophageal microperforations resolved without intervention. Most patients responded well to subsequent serial dilations and many discontinued gastrostomy tube use. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective, selection bias. CONCLUSIONS: An antegrade-retrograde rendezvous technique with subsequent dilation appears to be safe and effective for endoscopic management of complete upper esophageal obstruction induced by radiotherapy and can obviate the need for esophageal resection.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Factors predicting success of endoscopic variceal ligation for secondary prophylaxis of esophageal variceal bleeding.

INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic obliteration of esophageal varices by endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) is an effective form of secondary prophylaxis. However, there is no consensus regarding the technical aspects of EVL for secondary prophylaxis. The present study compares the technical aspects of EVL (frequency of sessions, number of sessions and number of bands used) in patients who rebled following secondary prophylaxis of esophageal varices by EVL compared to those who did not rebleed. METHODS: All patients who underwent EVL for treatment of acute variceal bleeding followed by EVL for secondary prophylaxis and who subsequently developed recurrent variceal bleeding at Mayo Clinic, Rochester between January 1995 and May 2003 were identified. A control group of patients undergoing EVL for secondary prophylaxis who did not rebleed was identified. RESULTS: During the study period, 216 patients with acute esophageal variceal hemorrhage underwent emergent EVL treatment with follow-up EVL for secondary prophylaxis, of whom 20 (9.3%) subsequently rebled. Both rebleeding and non-rebleeding patient groups were well-matched with respect to liver function (Child-Pugh class), number and size of variceal trunks, endoscopic stigmata of hemorrhage and beta-blocker usage. The median interval between EVL sessions in the rebleeding group (2 weeks, interquartile range 0-2 weeks) was significantly shorter compared to the non-rebleeding group (5 weeks, interquartile range 3-7 weeks; P = 0.004). Adjusting for age, gender, and Child-Pugh class, interbanding interval >/= 3 weeks was associated with increased likelihood of not rebleeding, hazard ratio 3.84 (95% confidence interval: 1.69-11.79; P = 0.0007). CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate the importance of technical aspects of EVL on patient outcome, suggesting the benefit of longer interbanding intervals. Future prospective studies are required to define the optimal intersession interval. Standardizing procedural aspects of EVL will aid in objectively evaluating the benefit of this procedure when compared to other modalities such as medical treatment.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2005

Direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy: outcomes in 307 consecutive attempts.

BACKGROUND: Clinical utilization of direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy (DPEJ) is increasing. However, little data exist regarding important clinical outcomes with DPEJ. OBJECTIVE: To describe the indications, success, and complications of DPEJ in a large cohort of >300 consecutive attempted DPEJ cases at our institution. METHODS: Institutional databases identified 316 consecutive attempted DPEJ placements between January 1996 and August 2004. The medical records of consenting patients were abstracted for demographics, indication, success, complications, and follow-up. A scheme for classifying complication severity was designed. RESULTS: Three hundred and seven attempts at DPEJ were made on 286 patients. Of these, 209 succeeded (68%). The most common indications for DPEJ included resectable distal esophageal cancer, other malignancies causing obstruction, gastroparesis, prior esophageal or gastric resection, and high aspiration risk. Overall, 81 adverse events (AEs) were associated with DPEJ placement or removal in 69 (22.5%) cases. There were 14 serious AEs, 20 moderate AEs, and 47 mild AEs. Serious AEs included 7 bowel perforations, 3 jejunal volvuli, 3 major bleeds, and 1 aspiration. The only death was due to profound jejunal mesenteric bleeding after an unsuccessful trocar pass. Moderate AEs included 9 chronic enterocutaneous fistulae. Many of the 47 mild AEs were site infections requiring oral antibiotics (23) or persistent site pain (14). CONCLUSIONS: DPEJ was associated with a moderate or severe complication in approximately 10% of cases. While DPEJ is a useful technique to gain enteral access that obviates the need for surgery and is more reliable than percutaneous gastrostomy with jejunal extension, patients and physicians should be aware of the risks involved.

Adult↗