Biomedical subjects

Louise A Jensen

Publications and source records attributed to Louise A Jensen.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Improving adherence to a mechanical ventilation weaning protocol for critically ill adults: outcomes after an implementation program.

BACKGROUND: Despite multiple reminders, education sessions, and multidisciplinary team involvement, adherence to an evidence-based mechanical ventilation weaning protocol had been less than 1% in a general systems intensive care unit since implementation. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of using an implementation program, the Model for Accelerating Improvement, to improve adherence and clinical outcomes after restarting a mechanical ventilation weaning protocol in an adult general systems intensive care unit. METHODS: A prospective comparative design, before and after implementation of the Model for Accelerating Improvement, was used with a consecutive sample of 129 patients and 112 multidisciplinary team members. Clinical outcomes were rate of unsuccessful extubations, rate of ventilator-associated pneumonia, and duration of mechanical ventilation; practice outcomes were staff's understanding of the mechanical ventilation weaning protocol, perceptions of the practice safety climate, and adherence to the weaning protocol. RESULTS: After the intervention, the rate of unsuccessful extubations decreased, and staff's understanding of and adherence to the weaning protocol increased significantly. The rate of ventilator-associated pneumonia, duration of mechanical ventilation, and staff's perceptions of the practice safety climate did not change significantly. CONCLUSION: Implementing the Model for Accelerating Improvement improved understanding of and adherence to protocol-directed weaning and reduced the rate of unsuccessful extubations.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2004

Women with coronary artery disease report worse health-related quality of life outcomes compared to men.

BACKGROUND: Although there have been substantial medical advances that improve the outcomes following cardiac ischemic events, gender differences in the treatment and course of recovery for patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) continue to exist. There is a general paucity of data comparing the health related quality of life (HRQOL) in men and women undergoing treatment for CAD. The purpose of this study was to compare HRQOL outcomes of men and women in Alberta, at one-year following initial catheterization, after adjustment for known demographic, co-morbid, and disease severity predictors of outcome. METHOD: The HRQOL outcome data were collected by means of a self-reported questionnaire mailed to patients on or near the one-year anniversary of their initial cardiac catheterization. Using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ), 5 dimensions of HRQOL were measured: exertional capacity, anginal stability, anginal frequency, quality of life and treatment satisfaction. Data from the APPROACH registry were used to risk-adjust the SAQ scale scores. Two analytical strategies were used including general least squares linear modeling, and proportional odds modeling sometimes referred to as the "ordinal logistic modeling". RESULTS: 3392 (78.1%) patients responded to the follow-up survey. The adjusted proportional odds ratios for men relative to women (PORs > 1 = better) indicated that men reported significantly better HRQOL on all 5 SAQ dimensions as compared to women. (PORs: Exertional Capacity 3.38 (2.75-4.15), Anginal Stability 1.23 (1.03-1.47), Anginal Frequency 1.70 (1.43-2.01), Treatment Satisfaction 1.27 (1.07-1.50), and QOL 1.74 (1.48-2.04). CONCLUSIONS: Women with CAD consistently reported worse HRQOL at one year follow-up compared to men. These findings underline the fact that conclusions based on research performed on men with CAD may not be valid for women and that more gender-related research is needed. Future studies are needed to further examine gender differences in psychosocial adjustment following treatment for CAD, as adjustment for traditional clinical variables fails to explain sex differences in health related quality of life outcomes.

Aged↗

PubMedDate not supplied

The notion of evidence in evidence-based practice by the Nursing Philosophy Working Group.

Questions concerning the nature of evidence in evidence-based practice have kindled debate within nursing and other health care disciplines. Such questions include the ends for which evidence is sought, the form(s) of evidence, and the values underlying evidence-based practice. In this article, some of the issues, contradictions, and tensions implicit in these questions are highlighted. It is imperative that the nursing profession continue to explore the philosophic perspectives that underscore evidence-based practice and their implications for decision making in nursing practice.

Clinical Nursing Research↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Referral rate and outcomes of cardiac rehabilitation after cardiac catheterization in a large Canadian city.

PURPOSE: The benefits of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) for patients with coronary artery disease are extensive and compelling, demonstrating reductions in mortality. However, some reports suggest that only 10% to 20% of eligible patients currently participate in formal CR programs. The purpose of this study was to identify the proportion of patients referred to CR in a large Canadian city, and to determine their statistically adjusted survival rates relative to patients not referred to CR. METHODS: Subjects eligible for this study included all adult residents with coronary artery disease from 1995 to 1999 in the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease registry. All 5,081 patients who survived 6 months or more after catheterization were included in the analysis. Survival data were adjusted using a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Referral to a CR program (28.9% of patients) was significantly more likely for young male patients who had undergone a prior revascularization procedure, presented with an ejection fraction exceeding 50%, and did not report cerebrovascular, peripheral vascular, or renal disease. Crude hazard ratios indicated that referral to a CR program remained significantly associated with lower mortality after control was used for clinical, anatomic, treatment and comorbid conditions recorded at catheterization (hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.51-0.90; P = .005). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the proven efficacy of CR in clinical trials, fewer than one third of the patients undergoing cardiac catheterization are referred to a CR program. The better survival outcomes noted for patients referred to CR suggests that there is an opportunity to improve care and outcomes through increased referral of patients to such programs.

Alberta↗