Biomedical subjects

Lubomir B Smilenov

Publications and source records attributed to Lubomir B Smilenov.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Ionizing radiation induces DNA double-strand breaks in bystander primary human fibroblasts.

That irradiated cells affect their unirradiated 'bystander' neighbors is evidenced by reports of increased clonogenic mortality, genomic instability, and expression of DNA-repair genes in the bystander cell populations. The mechanisms underlying the bystander effect are obscure, but genomic instability suggests DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) may be involved. Formation of DSBs induces the phosphorylation of the tumor suppressor protein, histone H2AX and this phosphorylated form, named gamma-H2AX, forms foci at DSB sites. Here we report that irradiation of target cells induces gamma-H2AX focus formation in bystander cell populations. The effect is manifested by increases in the fraction of cells in a population that contains multiple gamma-H2AX foci. After 18 h coculture with cells irradiated with 20 alpha-particles, the fraction of bystander cells with multiple foci increased 3.7-fold. Similar changes occurred in bystander populations mixed and grown with cells irradiated with gamma-rays, and in cultures containing media conditioned on gamma-irradiated cells. DNA DSB repair proteins accumulated at gamma-H2AX foci, indicating that they are sites of DNA DSB repair. Lindane, which blocks gap-junctions, prevented the bystander effect in mixing but not in media transfer protocols, while c-PTIO and aminoguanidine, which lower nitric oxide levels, prevented the bystander effect in both protocols. Thus, multiple mechanisms may be involved in transmitting bystander effects. These studies show that H2AX phosphorylation is an early step in the bystander effect and that the DNA DSBs underlying gamma-H2AX focus formation may be responsible for its downstream manifestations.

Bystander Effect↗

PubMed2005

Tumor development: haploinsufficiency and local network assembly.

According to the current models, tumor development is a continuous process of mutation accumulation, leading to several intermediate phenotypes and final phases of autonomy, unlimited growth and metastasis. One of the most important events in that process is the initial destabilization of cellular pathways that subsequently allow mutations to accumulate. The mechanisms involved in that stage are not clear. In principle, the estimated very low mutation frequency in human or mouse cells would suggest that accumulating the required number of mutations for tumor development should be a statistically unlikely event. However, this theory is contradicted by the high incidence of cancers. Here we discuss the role of protein haploinsufficiency as a contributor to the initial phases of tumor development, and suggest possible mechanisms that might be involved in that process.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Combined haploinsufficiency for ATM and RAD9 as a factor in cell transformation, apoptosis, and DNA lesion repair dynamics.

Loss of function of oncogenes, tumor suppressor genes and DNA damage processing genes has been implicated in the development of many types of cancer, but for the vast majority of cases, there is no link to specific germ line mutations. In the last several years, heterozygosity leading to haploinsufficiency for proteins involved in DNA repair pathways was shown to play a role in genomic instability and carcinogenesis after DNA damage is induced. Because the effect of haploinsufficiency for one protein is relatively small, we hypothesize that predisposition to cancer could be a result of the additive effect of heterozygosity for two or more genes, critical for pathways that control DNA damage signaling, repair or apoptosis. To address this issue, primary mouse cells, haploinsufficient for one or two proteins, ATM and RAD9, related to the cellular response to DNA damage were examined. The results show that cells having low levels of both ATM and RAD9 proteins are more sensitive to transformation by radiation, have different DNA double-strand break repair dynamics and are less apoptotic when compared with wild-type controls or those cells haploinsufficient for only one of these proteins. Our conclusions are that under stress conditions, the efficiency and capacity for DNA repair mediated by the ATM/RAD9 cell signaling network depend on the abundance of both proteins and that, in general, DNA repair network efficiencies are genotype-dependent and can vary within a specific range.

Animals↗