Biomedical subjects

Luc H V van der Woude

Publications and source records attributed to Luc H V van der Woude.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2004

Mechanical loading of the low back and shoulders during pushing and pulling activities.

The objective of this study was to quantify the mechanical load on the low back and shoulders during pushing and pulling in combination with three task constraints: the use of one or two hands, three cart weights, and two handle heights. The second objective was to explore the relation between the initial and sustained exerted forces and the mechanical load on the low back and shoulders. Detailed biomechanical models of the low back and shoulder joint were used to estimate mechanical loading. Using generalized estimating equations (GEE) the effects were quantified for exerted push/pull forces, net moments at the low back and shoulders, compressive and shear forces at the low back, and compressive forces at the glenohumeral joint. The results of this study appeared to be useful to estimate ergonomics consequences of interventions in the working constraints during pushing and pulling. Cart weight as well as handle height had a considerable effect on the mechanical load and it is recommended to maintain low cart weights and to push or pull at shoulder height. Initial and sustained exerted forces were not highly correlated with the mechanical load at the low back and shoulders within the studied range of the exerted forces.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Physical activity for people with a disability: a conceptual model.

The promotion of a physically active lifestyle has become an important issue in health policy in first-world countries. A physically active lifestyle is accompanied by several fitness and health benefits. Individuals with a disability can particularly benefit from an active lifestyle: not only does it reduce the risk for secondary health problems, but all levels of functioning can be influenced positively. The objective of this article is to propose a conceptual model that describes the relationships between physical activity behaviour, its determinants and functioning of people with a disability. The literature was systematically searched for articles considering physical activity and disability, and models relating both topics were looked for in particular. No models were found relating physical activity behaviour, its determinants and functioning in people with a disability. Consequently, a new model, the Physical Activity for people with a Disability (PAD) model, was constructed based on existing models of disability and models of determinants of physical activity behaviour. The starting point was the new WHO Model of Functioning and Disability, part of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), which describes the multidimensional aspects of functioning and disability. Physical activity behaviour and its determinants were integrated into the ICF model. The factors determining physical activity were based mainly on those used in the Attitude, Social influence and self-Efficacy (ASE) model. The proposed model can be used as a theoretical framework for future interventions and research on physical activity promotion in the population of people with a disability. The model currently forms the theoretical basis for a large physical activity promotion trial in ten Dutch rehabilitation centres.

Attitude↗

PubMed2002

Low-back and shoulder complaints among workers with pushing and pulling tasks.

OBJECTIVES: Low-back and shoulder complaints were examined in relation to self-reported and objectively assessed exposure to work-related pushing and pulling. METHODS: Workers from several companies (eg, nursing homes and flower auctions) with pushing and pulling tasks and, as reference, workers without physically demanding tasks were invited to participate. Altogether 829 workers initially received a questionnaire, of whom 459 responded both initially and after 1 year of follow-up. Initially, self-reported exposure to pushing and pulling was assessed by questionnaire. Furthermore, a representative sample of 131 workers was observed at work using TRAC (task recording and analysis on computer) to assess exposure to pushing and pulling objectively. For exposure to pushing and pulling, the workers were classified into a reference group and medium and high exposure groups. Initially and in the follow-up, the 12-month prevalence of low-back and shoulder complaints was assessed. Complaints reported in the follow-up were separately used as dependent variables to calculate prevalence rate ratios (PR) in a Cox's proportional hazard regression analysis. RESULTS: The adjusted PR values were not significant for low-back complaints. For shoulder complaints, both the medium and high exposure groups showed significant adjusted PR values for self-reported exposure and observed duration of pushing and pulling when compared with the reference group (PR range 2.18-4.86). For the observed frequency of pushing and pulling, only the medium exposure group showed a significant PR, of 3.95. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest a rather strong relationship between pushing and pulling and shoulder complaints. The evidence for a relationship between pushing and pulling and low-back complaints is limited.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Successfully improving physical activity behavior after rehabilitation.

PURPOSE: To determine the effects of the physical activity promotion programs Rehabilitation & Sports (R&S) and Active after Rehabilitation (AaR) on sport and daily physical activity 1 year after in- or outpatient rehabilitation. DESIGN: Subjects in intervention rehabilitation centers were randomized into a group receiving R&S only (n = 315) and a group receiving R&S and AaR (n = 284). Subjects in six control centers (n = 603) received usual care. SETTING: Ten Dutch rehabilitation centers. SUBJECTS: Subjects consisted of 1202 rehabilitation patients. Most frequent diagnoses were stroke, neurological disorders, and back disorders. INTERVENTION: Both the sport stimulation program (R&S) and the daily physical activity promotion program (AaR) consisted of personalized tailored counseling. MEASURES: Two sport outcomes and two daily physical activity outcomes were assessed with questionnaires at baseline and 1 year after rehabilitation. ANALYSIS: Multilevel analyses comparing both intervention groups to the control group. RESULTS: The R&S program showed no significant effects. Intention-to-treat analyses in the R&S + AaR group showed borderline significant improvements in one sport (odds ratio [OR] = 1.66, p = .02) and both physical activity outcomes (OR = 1.68, p = .01 and regression coefficient = 10.78, p = .05). On-treatment analyses in the R&S + AaR group showed similar but stronger effects. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of the R&S and AaR programs improved physical activity behavior and sport participation 1 year after in- or outpatient rehabilitation. The R&S program alone did not have any effects.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Normative values and determinants of physical capacity in individuals with spinal cord injury.

We reanalyzed data from five studies with similar or identical methodology performed by our laboratory to define normative values and determinants of physical capacity in individuals with tetraplegia and paraplegia. Each study consisted of a graded wheelchair exercise test to determine peak oxygen uptake and maximal power output and could additionally include a wheelchair sprint test to determine short-term (anaerobic) power output and/or an isometric strength test. The combined subject population included 166 individuals (20 women), varying considerably for age, body mass, lesion level, time since injury, and activity level. Ranges in physical capacity parameters were extensive and normative values for individuals with tetraplegia and paraplegia were established. These physical capacity norms could be used for evaluation of fitness status and training or therapeutic interventions. Multiple regression procedures indicated that 48-80% of the variance in physical capacity could be explained by lesion level and completeness, activity level, gender, age, body mass, and time since injury. Although physical capacity is largely determined by factors that cannot be altered, such as lesion level, age, and gender, changeable factors such as activity level and body mass play an additional role.

Adult↗