Biomedical subjects

Lucas H M Mens

Publications and source records attributed to Lucas H M Mens.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Frequency-specific objective audiometry: tone-evoked brainstem responses and steady-state responses to 40 Hz and 90 Hz amplitude modulated stimuli.

Tone-evoked Auditory Brainstem Responses (tone-burst ABRs) and Auditory Steady-State Responses (ASSRs) with 40 or 90 Hz amplitude modulation (AM) were compared, using the same equipment and recording parameters, to determine which of these three methods most accurately approached the behavioural hearing thresholds in response to 500 Hz and 2000 Hz stimuli in eleven awake adults with normal hearing. Estimates of the thresholds obtained with the three methods were 10, 18, and 26 dB SL at 500 Hz; and 10, 12, and 22 dB SL at 2000 Hz; using 40 Hz ASSR, 90 Hz ASSR, and tone-burst ABR, respectively. ASSRs with 40 Hz AM stimuli produced significantly better results (lowest thresholds with SD=0), whereas the wave-V analysis on the tone-burst ABR produced the poorest results. In the averaged ABRs, a robust steady-state potential was also visible. Analysis of those steady-state responses showed estimated thresholds of 13 and 14 dB SL (at 500 and 2000 Hz, respectively), thus considerably better than the estimated thresholds from the wave-V analysis. It is concluded that the 40 Hz ASSR showed superior results, especially at 500 Hz.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2005

EEG derivations providing auditory steady-state responses with high signal-to-noise ratios in infants.

OBJECTIVE: To identify EEG derivations that yield high signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) of the auditory steady-state response (ASSR) in infants aged 0 to 5 months. DESIGN: The ASSR was recorded simultaneously from 10 EEG derivations in a monopolar montage in 20 sleeping infants. Stimuli were tones of 0.5 or 2 kHz that were 100% amplitude modulated and 20% frequency modulated, presented at 65 dB SPL for 4.4 minutes in either the right or the left ear. An amplitude modulation frequency of 90 Hz (left ear) or 94 Hz (right ear) was used. From the 10 measured monopolar derivations, all 45 bipolar derivations were calculated mounting up to 55 EEG derivations. EEG derivations were selected in the preferred set if they had the largest SNRs within subjects and if they were obtained significantly more frequently across subjects than was expected by chance (Monte Carlo simulation and Wilcoxon signed ranks test). RESULTS: The preferred derivations are both mastoids ipsilateral to the stimulated ear with Cz as common reference. These derivations improved SNRs compared with each of several conventional EEG derivations (excluding the preferred derivations) between 16 and 69% (500 Hz, left ear), 9 and 132% (500 Hz, right ear), 31 and 193% (2 kHz, left ear), and 3 and 105% (2 kHz, right ear). In contrast to results reported earlier for adults, high SNRs were not found at the inion-Cz derivation in these infants. CONCLUSIONS: High SNRs were obtained in infants aged younger than 6 months if the ASSR was recorded from the mastoids ipsilateral to the ear of stimulation referenced to Cz.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2005

Speech perception with mono- and quadrupolar electrode configurations: a crossover study.

OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of two multipolar electrode configurations on speech perception, pitch perception, and the intracochlear electrical field. STUDY DESIGN: Crossover design; within subject. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Eight experienced adult cochlear implant users. INTERVENTION: Each subject used each of three experimental processors for 3 weeks. The following processors were compared that differed only in electrode configuration: 1) monopolar; 2) hybrid quadrupolar, in which half of the current returned to the extracochlear reference electrode and half to two electrodes immediately to the left and right of the active electrode; and 3) flat tripolar +2, which directed all the current to four reference electrodes (two on each side), separated from the active electrode by two inactive electrodes. All the processors used the standard Advanced Bionics HiRes speech-processing strategy, 12 channels, 1,220 pulses per second per channel, and with a pulse width of 33 (micros/phase). RESULTS: The monopolar processors had the largest stimulation efficiency and the smallest dynamic range in linear current units. The reverse was true of flat tripolar +2 processor, whereas the hybrid quadrupolar processor fell in between. Insufficient loudness growth prevented the use of the flat tripolar +2 processor in three subjects. Word recognition did not differ between the clinically used 16-channel monopolar processor and the experimental monopolar processor, regardless of the differences in the number of channels, pulse rate, and duration of experience. Word recognition with the flat tripolar +2 processor was significantly poorer than with the monopolar and hybrid quadrupolar processors; monopolar and quadrupolar processors did not differ. There was no significant interaction between processor type and competing noise type (stationary or fluctuating), but performance at the higher level of fluctuating noise was best with the hybrid quadrupolar processor in almost all the subjects. Pitch scaling showed ceiling performance in five subjects and differed between processors in the two other subjects with imperfect tonotopy. Intracochlear current spread was considerable with the monopolar configuration; it was reduced with the hybrid quadrupolar configuration and virtually absent beyond the active electrodes with the tripolar configuration. CONCLUSION: More confined configurations reduced the longitudinal width of the electrical field, which was expected to enhance channel separation, but no improvement in word recognition was found. More research is needed to test confined configurations that have enhanced efficiency and to evaluate the fundamental effects of configuration on channel discriminability.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2002

Averaged electrode voltages in users of the Clarion cochlear implant device.

Averaged electrode voltages (AEVs) are of secondary importance for integrity testing of cochlear implant devices featuring back-telemetry. However, AEVs are device-independent and may show intermittent failures and deviant stimulation patterns unnoticed by telemetry. We collected AEVs from 18 users of the Clarion 1.2 system and 6 users of the HiFocus system in order to establish norms for evaluating AEVs in difficult cases. The stimuli were presented with the standard clinical software. Monopolar stimulation at about 16 microA showed large AEVs (mean, 173 microV) suitable for integrity testing. No electrode failures were found. The AEV amplitudes from neighboring electrodes differed by less than 30% (2 SD). The AEVs from subjects with the Clarion HiFocus electrode and/or the Clarion electrode positioner were within the normal range. The AEV amplitudes from bipolar stimulation were much more variable. Inversion of phases between electrodes was found in patients with an altered state of the cochlea (otosclerosis and osteogenesis imperfecta) and in a patient with a curled electrode tip. There was no correlation across subjects between AEVs and electrode impedances. Therefore, impedances are dominated by the electrode-tissue interface, in contrast to AEVs, which are determined by the volume conduction in the body.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

The Clarion Electrode positioner: approximation to the medial wall and current focussing?

In order to establish whether the electrical field created by a cochlear implant electrode is more focussed in a perimodiolar than in a medial position, voltages at non-stimulated electrodes were collected from the Clarion 1.2 implant before and after insertion of the Clarion Electrode Positioning System. The positioner is inserted lateral to the electrode array and is intended to bring the array close to the medial wall of the scala tympani. These intracochlear electrode voltages (IEVs) were collected in 9 surgeries with the HiFocus I electrode array with positioner. Stapedius reflex thresholds were decreased after insertion of the positioner on 20 out of 22 electrodes. Electrode impedances did not increase significantly. IEVs increased slightly for all stimulated electrodes. However, the positioner did not significantly affect the slope of the IEVs for any of the stimulated electrodes. Individual differences between patients in the mean IEV amplitude were considerable; 2 patients deafened by otosclerosis showed particularly low amplitudes. Thus, IEVs provided no evidence of a focussing of the electrical field by introducing the positioner. Possible benefits of a perimodiolar position regarding efficiency and channel separation are discussed in terms of a reduced distance between electrodes and neural elements.

Cochlear Implants↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Signal-to-noise ratios of the auditory steady-state response from fifty-five EEG derivations in adults.

The Auditory Steady-State Response (ASSR) was recorded in 20 awake adults with normal hearing on ten EEG channels simultaneously to find derivations with the best signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs). Stimuli were 20% frequency modulated tones of 0.5 and 2 kHz at 20 dB SL, 100% amplitude modulated at 90 or 94 Hz, and presented one at a time to one ear. ASSR recordings using a set of at least three channels improved SNRs significantly by an average of between 6% (500 Hz right ear) to 118% (2 kHz right ear) above the SNRs from the conventional channels. Assuming that the recording time was proportional to 1/(SNR)2, this translates into a recording time of 89% (500 Hz right ear) to 21% (2 kHz right ear) of that for conventional single-channel recording. The three channels comprised the electrode positions inion, right mastoid, and left mastoid. All three electrode positions were referenced to Cz. Adding a fourth channel (Pz-Cz) increases the number of participants with significant responses from the 500 Hz right ear stimulus from 13 to 17. Electrode position F4 and other commonly used positions such as the forehead and right earlobe made significantly less contribution to test efficiency.

Acoustic Stimulation↗