PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Lucile Ruel

Publications and source records attributed to Lucile Ruel.

2 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2004

Comparison of in vitro and in vivo MRI of the spine using parallel imaging.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the image quality of two parallel-imaging methods applied to standard turbo spin-echo T2-weighted imaging of the lumbar spine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Phantom imaging and lumbar spine studies of 15 healthy subjects were performed using T2-weighted turbo spin-echo sequences obtained with and without parallel imaging (generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisition [GRAPPA] and modified sensitive encoding [mSENSE]) on a 1.5-T magnet. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and uniformity were measured in the phantom, and SNR and signal difference-noise ratio were evaluated in cerebrospinal fluid, vertebral bodies, and subcutaneous fat of the volunteers, using both techniques sequentially. Aliasing artifacts on GRAPPA and mSENSE images were visually evaluated. SNRs were compared using the Student's paired t test, with p values less than 0.05 considered significant. RESULTS: In the phantom study, when the same number of coil elements were used (n = 3), SNR and uniformity values obtained with standard T2-weighted turbo spin-echo sequences were higher than those obtained with parallel sequences. The GRAPPA SNR obtained with three coil elements was higher than the standard T2-weighted SNR obtained with one coil element. Similar findings were noted regarding uniformity. In the lumbar spine, GRAPPA SNR values for fat, cerebrospinal fluid, and vertebral bodies were significantly higher than mSENSE SNR values, with a p value less than 0.01, but were not significantly different from T2-weighted turbo spin-echo SNR values. GRAPPA signal difference-noise ratio values were significantly higher than mSENSE signal difference-noise ratio values, with a p value less than 0.01, but were not significantly different from T2-weighted turbo spin-echo signal difference-noise ratio values. GRAPPA produced fewer aliasing artifacts than mSENSE. CONCLUSION: In spine MRI, GRAPPA may be used to reduce scanning time and yields a higher SNR than mSENSE without any increase in aliasing artifacts and with an SNR similar to that obtained with standard T2-weighted turbo spin-echo.

Artifacts↗
PubMed2004

Water diffusion compartmentation at high b values in ischemic human brain.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We studied the evolution of brain water compartments during the early stage of ischemic stroke. METHODS: Diffusion-weighted imaging was performed at 1.5 T in 10 volunteers and 14 patients with stroke. We used a single-shot echo-planar technique with 11 b values of 0-5000 s/mm(2). Regions of interest were selected in the white matter (WM) and striatum of the volunteers and in the ischemic core of the patients. Measurements were fitted on the basis of a biexponential decay with the b factor as follows: S(b) = S(0)[(f(slow) x exp(-b x ADC(slow)) + (f(fast) x exp(-b x ADC(fast))] where S(b) is the signal intensity in the presence of a diffusion gradient, S(0) is the signal intensity without diffusion sensitization, ADC(slow) and ADC(fast) are the respective apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) of slow diffusing compartments (SDCs) and fast diffusing compartments (FDCs), and f(slow) and f(fast) the respective contributions to the signal intensity of SDC and FDC. RESULTS: In healthy subjects, FDC represents 74.3 +/- 3.1% of brain water, with ADC(fast) = (124.6 +/- 12.0) x 10(-5) mm(2)/s and ADC(slow) = (15.5 +/- 3.9) x 10(-5) mm(2)/s. In stroke, decreased FDC (49.1% +/- 10.9%; P = 1.05 x10(-5)) and increased ADC(slow) ([22.4 +/- 8.1] x 10(-5) mm(2)/s; P = 8.07 x 10(-3)) were observed, but ADC(fast) was not significantly changed ([135.6 +/- 25.7] x 10 (-5) mm(2)/s; P =.151). CONCLUSION: The restricted diffusion observed in the early stroke is mainly related to a redistribution of water from the FDC to the SDC.

Body Water↗