PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Luis A Bravo

Publications and source records attributed to Luis A Bravo.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

Self-etching primer and a non-rinse conditioner versus phosphoric acid: alternative methods for bonding brackets.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a self-etching primer, Transbond Plus Self Etching Primer (TSEP, 3M Unitek), and a non-rinse conditioner (NRC, Dentsply DeTrey) for bonding brackets, compared with the acid-etch technique. The brackets were bonded to extracted premolars using Transbond XT (3M Unitek). One of the following three conditioning protocols were used: (1) 37 per cent phosphoric acid (n = 25), (2) TSEP (n = 25), and (3) NRC (n = 15). Shear bond strength (SBS) was measured with a universal testing machine. The adhesive remaining after debonding was determined using image analysis equipment. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) observations were also carried out on 12 premolars to observe the enamel surfaces. No significant differences were observed in SBS between the three groups (P = 0.56). TSEP and NRC left significantly less adhesive on the tooth than the traditional acid-etch technique (P = 0.004 and P = 0.000, respectively). NRC left significantly less adhesive than TSEP (P = 0.001). SEM observations showed that NRC produced a less aggressive etch pattern than TSEP, and that the etching effect of TSEP approximated that of phosphoric acid.

Acid Etching, Dental↗

Effects of 3 adhesion promoters on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets: an in-vitro study.

INTRODUCTION: The objectives of this study were to (1) determine the effect of 3 adhesion promoters on shear bond strength and the amount of remnant adhesive on the teeth after debonding and (2) learn whether 1 promoter is material-specific, as stated by the manufacturer. METHODS: The promoters tested were OrthoSolo (Ormco, Orange, Calif), All-Bond 2 (Bisco, Schaumburg, Ill), and Enhance L.C. (Reliance, Itasca, Ill). Two adhesives were used: Transbond XT (3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif) and Light Bond (Reliance). One hundred fifty premolars were divided into 6 groups of 25, and brackets were bonded according to the manufacturers' instructions: (1) Transbond XT, (2) Transbond XT plus All-Bond 2, (3) Transbond XT plus OrthoSolo, (4) Transbond XT plus Enhance L.C., (5) Light Bond, and (6) Light Bond plus Enhance L.C. Bond strength was tested on a universal testing machine, and remnant adhesive was quantified with image analysis equipment. RESULTS: The highest bond strength values were obtained when brackets were bonded with Light Bond plus Enhance L.C. These values were significantly higher than those achieved with Transbond XT, Transbond XT plus Enhance L.C., or Transbond XT plus All-Bond 2. Of the groups bonded with Transbond XT, the group that included OrthoSolo had the best results. CONCLUSIONS: None of the adhesion promoters significantly increased bond strength or the amount of adhesive remaining on the tooth after debonding. Enhance L.C. produced the greatest bond strength when used with the material-specific product Light Bond.

Adhesiveness↗

Direct bonding with precoated brackets and self-etching primers.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the shear bond strength and the adhesive remnant on the tooth after the debonding of APC Plus precoated brackets, when conditioning the enamel with phosphoric acid and Transbond Plus Self Etching Primer (TSEP), in comparison with uncoated brackets bonded with Transbond XT. METHODS: The brackets were bonded to extracted premolars, which were divided into three groups: (1) Acid/Transbond XT, (2) Acid/ APC Plus and (3) TSEP/APC Plus. Shear bond strength was measured using a universal test machine. The crosshead speed was 1 mm/minute. The adhesive remnant on the tooth was quantified using an image analysis equipment. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in the bond strengths of the three groups evaluated (P> 0.05). The two groups in which APC Plus system was used left significantly less adhesive on the tooth than Transbond XT. TSEP/APC Plus left significantly less adhesive than Acid/APC Plus (P< 0.017).

Chi-Square Distribution↗

Effect of surface treatments on the bond strength of brackets bonded with a compomer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of the compomer Dyract AP for bonding brackets when conditioning the enamel with phosphoric acid and a non-rinsing conditioner (NRC), in comparison with a control group in which the resin orthodontic adhesive system Transbond XT was used. METHODS: The brackets were bonded to extracted premolars which were divided into three groups: (1) Acid/Transbond XT, (2) NRC/Dyract AP and (3) Acid/Dyract AP. Shear bond strength was measured with a universal testing machine. The crosshead speed was 1mm/minute. The adhesive remnant on the tooth after debonding was determined using image analysis equipment. RESULTS: The bond strength of Acid/Transbond XT was significantly higher than bond strengths of Acid/Dyract AP and NRC/Dyract AP (P< 0.017). No significant differences were observed between Acid/Dyract AP and NRC/Dyract APBond strength values (P> 0.017). Acid/Transbond XT left significantly more adhesive on the tooth than Acid/Dyract AP and NRC/Dyract AP, whereas NRC/Dyract AP left significantly less adhesive than Acid/Dyract AP (P< 0.05).

Acid Etching, Dental↗

A comparison of the shear bond strength of a resin cement and two orthodontic resin adhesive systems.

The object of this study was to compare the shear bond strength and the quantity of adhesive remaining on the tooth after the debonding of brackets bonded with two light-cured orthodontic resin adhesive systems (Transbond XT and Light-Bond) and a dual-cured resin cement (RelyX Unicem). Seventy-five premolars were divided into three groups. In each group, brackets were bonded with one of the adhesives according to the manufacturer's instructions. Shear bond strength was measured using a universal test machine at a crosshead speed of one mm/min, and adhesive remnant was quantified using image analysis equipment. Our results showed that the resin cement produced significantly lower bond strength than the two orthodontic resin adhesive systems. It was also observed that the bond strength produced by Light-Bond was significantly greater than that of Transbond XT. RelyX left significantly less remnant adhesive than Transbond XT and Light-Bond. Between the two orthodontic systems, Light-Bond left significantly less adhesive on the tooth than Transbond XT.

Bicuspid↗

Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with self-etching primers.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of two self-etching primers for bonding brackets in comparison with the conventional acid-etch technique. METHODS: The brackets were bonded to extracted human premolars using the resin orthodontic adhesive system, Transbond XT. This procedure was carried out in accordance with one of the following three protocols of enamel conditioning: (1) 37% phosphoric acid etching, (2) Transbond Plus Self Etching Primer (TSEP), and (3) Adper Prompt L-Pop (Adper PLP). Shear bond strength was measured with a universal test machine. The adhesive remnant on the tooth after debonding was quantified using image analysis equipment. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to observe the effects of conditioning of each product on the enamel. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed in bond strengths of the three groups evaluated (P> 0.05). Self-etching primers left significantly less adhesive on the tooth than the conventional acid-etch technique and, among them, Adper PLP left significantly less adhesive than TSEP (P< 0.017). SEM observations showed that the etching effect of self-etching primers approximated to the etching effect of phosphoric acid.

Acid Etching, Dental↗

Adhesion promoters: effects on the bond strength of brackets.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of two adhesion promoters on shear bond strength and remnant adhesive of brackets cemented with a light-cured orthodontic adhesive resin system. METHODS: The two adhesion promoters tested were OrthoSolo and All-Bond 2 Primer. Seventy-five upper premolars were divided into three groups of 25. A control group was established using Transbond-XT adhesive system and two experimental groups: Transbond-XT/OrthoSolo and Transbond-XT/All-Bond 2. Shear bond strength was measured using a universal testing machine and adhesive remnant was quantified using an image analysis equipment. RESULTS: The application of Orthosolo significantly increased bond strength for Transbond-XT adhesive system (P< 0.017). All-Bond 2 primer did not significantly increase the bond strength of Transbond-XT (P> 0.017). The Adhesive Remnant Index results and the analysis of the percentage of area of tooth occupied by adhesive indicated that adhesive remnant after debonding did not increase significantly (P> 0.05) with the use of either of the promoters.

Chi-Square Distribution↗

Prevention of habitual cheek biting: a case report.

Oral and peri-oral structures can be traumatized by self-injurious behavior (SIB). Various articles have described prostheses used to prevent SIB-related injuries to the oral tissues of patients who have developmental or medical problems, such as psychological problems, congenital syndromes or mental retardation; however, reports of oral SIB in individuals unaffected by the above conditions are scarce. This case report describes the use of a removable prosthesis to prevent a stress-induced cheek biting habit in 15-year-old girl who did not have any of the commonly related conditions. The report discusses the importance of designing a prosthesis that protects tissues, while considering injury severity and the patient's healthas well as her ability to cooperate with treatment.

Adolescent↗