Biomedical subjects

Luis A Parada

Publications and source records attributed to Luis A Parada.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

S-adenosylmethionine regulates cytoplasmic HuR via AMP-activated kinase.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: After liver injury, hepatic S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) content decreases, and the blockage this molecule imposes on hepatocyte proliferation is released, facilitating liver regeneration. This activity of SAM is important for normal liver function because mice deficient in hepatic SAM display abnormal liver regeneration and develop hepatocellular carcinoma. How SAM regulates hepatocyte growth is unclear, but because SAM blocks hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)-induced cyclin D1 expression and DNA synthesis without affecting HGF-induced extracellular signal-regulated kinase phosphorylation, the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway is probably not the target. METHODS: The effects of SAM on AMPK, HuR localization were assessed in rat hepatocytes after HGF, AICAR, and SAM treatment. RESULTS: We show here that HGF and 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide-riboside (AICAR), an activator of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), induce the phosphorylation of AMPK in hepatocytes and that SAM blocks this process. We also show that HGF- and AICAR-induced AMPK activation stimulate the transport from nucleus to cytoplasm of HuR, an RNA-binding protein that increases the half-life of target mRNA such as cyclin A2, and that SAM blocks this process. We found that, in hepatocytes, AICAR increases HuR binding to cyclin A2 messenger RNA (mRNA) as well as the expression and stability of this mRNA and that SAM blocks these events. Consistently, we found that AICAR induces hepatocyte proliferation and that SAM blocks this effect. Finally, we found that liver AMPK phosphorylation, cytoplasmic HuR, and binding of HuR to HuR-target mRNA and the steady-state levels of these mRNA are increased in knockout mice deficient in hepatic SAM. CONCLUSIONS: Our results yield novel insights about the mechanism by which SAM inhibits cell-cycle progression in the liver.

AMP-Activated Protein Kinases↗

PubMed2004

Tissue-specific spatial organization of genomes.

BACKGROUND: Genomes are organized in vivo in the form of chromosomes. Each chromosome occupies a distinct nuclear subvolume in the form of a chromosome territory. The spatial positioning of chromosomes within the interphase nucleus is often nonrandom. It is unclear whether the nonrandom spatial arrangement of chromosomes is conserved among tissues or whether spatial genome organization is tissue-specific. RESULTS: Using two-dimensional and three-dimensional fluorescence in situ hybridization we have carried out a systematic analysis of the spatial positioning of a subset of mouse chromosomes in several tissues. We show that chromosomes exhibit tissue-specific organization. Chromosomes are distributed tissue-specifically with respect to their position relative to the center of the nucleus and also relative to each other. Subsets of chromosomes form distinct types of spatial clusters in different tissues and the relative distance between chromosome pairs varies among tissues. Consistent with the notion that nonrandom spatial proximity is functionally relevant in determining the outcome of chromosome translocation events, we find a correlation between tissue-specific spatial proximity and tissue-specific translocation prevalence. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that the spatial organization of genomes is tissue-specific and point to a role for tissue-specific spatial genome organization in the formation of recurrent chromosome arrangements among tissues.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Spatial genome organization.

The linear sequence of genomes exists within the three-dimensional space of the cell nucleus. The spatial arrangement of genes and chromosomes within the interphase nucleus is nonrandom and gives rise to specific patterns. While recent work has begun to describe some of the positioning patterns of chromosomes and gene loci, the structural constraints that are responsible for nonrandom positioning and the relevance of spatial genome organization for genome expression are unclear. Here we discuss potential functional consequences of spatial genome organization and we speculate on the possible molecular mechanisms of how genomes are organized within the space of the mammalian cell nucleus.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Genetic profiling of colorectal cancer liver metastases by combined comparative genomic hybridization and G-banding analysis.

The majority of genetic studies of colorectal carcinogenesis have focused on changes found in primary tumors. Despite the fact that liver metastases are a leading cause of colorectal cancer deaths, the molecular genetic basis of the advanced disease stages remains poorly understood. We performed comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) on 17 liver metastases from colorectal carcinomas and compared the quantitative profile with the qualitative profile previously obtained with chromosome banding. An average of 12.6 aberrations per tumor was found by CGH. Chromosome 18 and chromosome arms 4q, 8p, and 17p were most frequently lost, whereas chromosomes 7 and 20 and chromosome arms 6p, 8q, and 13q were most frequently gained. We compared the chromosome banding and CGH data after converting the karyotypes into net copy number gains and losses. Ten tumors showed agreement between the findings of the two techniques, whereas five tumors did not (in two cases, no mitotic cells were obtained for banding analysis). All five discordant cases had a "simple" abnormal or normal karyotype, but revealed multiple changes by CGH. A likely explanation for this discrepancy is that in vitro growth before G-banding selected against the cancer cells. Interestingly, by comparing the CGH profiles of the "complex" vs. the "simple"/normal karyotype groups, deletion of 8p and gain of 16q were seen more frequently in the former group. The liver metastases had the same aberrations as seen in primary colorectal carcinomas, summarized in a literature survey. However, these aberrations were seen more frequently in liver metastases, which may be attributable to increased genetic instability.

Chromosome Aberrations↗

PubMed2003

An uncertainty principle in chromosome positioning.

Chromosomes are non-randomly positioned in the mammalian interphase nucleus. It is not known how patterns of chromosome positions are established or to what degree spatial arrangements of chromosomes change during the cell cycle, especially during mitosis. Two reports have applied in vivo microscopy to track chromosomes in space and time. The results highlight the inherently imperfect and probabilistic nature of chromosome positioning in the cell nucleus.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Spatial proximity of translocation-prone gene loci in human lymphomas.

Cancer cells frequently have disease-specific chromosome rearrangements. It is poorly understood why translocations between chromosomes recur at specific breakpoints in the genome. Here we provide evidence that higher-order spatial genome organization is a contributing factor in the formation of recurrent translocations. We show that MYC, BCL and immunoglobulin loci, which are recurrently translocated in various B-cell lymphomas, are preferentially positioned in close spatial proximity relative to each other in normal B cells. Loci in spatial proximity are non-randomly positioned towards the nuclear interior in normal B cells. This locus proximity is the consequence of higher-order genome structure rather than a property of individual genes. Our results suggest that the formation of specific translocations in human lymphomas, and perhaps other tissues, is determined in part by higher-order spatial organization of the genome.

DNA-Binding Proteins↗

PubMed2002

Conservation of relative chromosome positioning in normal and cancer cells.

Chromosomes exist in the interphase nucleus as individual chromosome territories. It is unclear to what extent chromosome territories occupy particular positions with respect to each other and how structural rearrangements, such as translocations, affect chromosome organization within the cell nucleus. Here we analyze the relative interphase positioning of chromosomes in mouse lymphoma cells compared to normal splenocytes. We show that in a lymphoma cell line derived from an ATM(-/-) mouse, two translocated chromosomes are preferentially positioned in close proximity to each other. The relative position of the chromosomes involved in these translocations is conserved in normal splenocytes. Relative positioning of chromosomes in normal splenocytes is not due to their random distribution in the interphase nucleus and persists during mitosis. These observations demonstrate that the relative arrangement of chromosomes in the interphase nucleus can be conserved between normal and cancer cells and our data support the notion that physical proximity facilitates rearrangements between chromosomes.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Cytogenetic abnormalities in a hemangiopericytoma of the spleen.

To date, only 16 cytogenetically abnormal hemangiopericytomas (HP) have been reported. Despite this low number, some characteristic karyotypic features have already emerged: most HP are near-diploid and breakpoints in 12q13, 12q24, and 19q13 seem to be common, with t(12;19)(q13;q13) being a recurrent translocation. Here, we report the first case of a probably benign splenic HP with chromosomal abnormalities. The abnormal karyotype was 47,XX,t(5;22;11)(q31;q11;q13),+10. None of these abnormalities have previously been reported in HP, suggesting that the karyotypic pattern of splenic HP may differ from soft tissue HP.

Chromosome Aberrations↗