Biomedical subjects

Lyle A Simmons

Publications and source records attributed to Lyle A Simmons.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Single-molecule tracking of RNA-DNA hybrid removal enzymes important for lagging-strand replication.

The formation of RNA-DNA hybrid (RDH) primers by primase is an essential step in the recruitment of DNA polymerase during replication initiation and for the synthesis of each Okazaki fragment on the lagging strand. In addition to primers, RDHs form through misincorporation of ribonucleotides by DNA polymerase during elongation and by formation of R loops during transcription. R loops are three-stranded structures that form when the nascent mRNA anneals to the template DNA strand, displacing the complementary DNA strand. The persistence of RDHs is deleterious to genome stability in all cells because they increase susceptibility to mutations, impaired replication fork progression, DNA double-stranded breaks, and genomic rearrangements. In many bacteria, it is well established that components of the replicative DNA polymerase form a macromolecular complex that can be imaged using single-molecule or ensemble fluorescence approaches. The spatiotemporal regulation of proteins involved in RDH removal during lagging-strand maturation is less clear. Here, we study three proteins that are involved in the removal of RDHs from the lagging strand during DNA replication in the Gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis: DNA polymerase I (Pol I), FenA, and RNase HIII. We characterized the behavior of each PAmCherry-tagged lagging-strand enzyme in living cells using single-particle tracking photoactivated localization microscopy. We find that all three proteins are highly mobile, suggesting residence times at their target substrates are below our temporal resolution. We also find evidence that Pol I activity is modulated through interaction with the replisome, whereas FenA and RNase HIII are regulated through access to the nucleoid. Our results provide new insight into how enzymes are recruited to resolve RDHs during lagging-strand replication in vivo.

DNA Replication↗

PubMed2026

DNA polymerase I: structure, activity, and function in bacterial DNA replication and repair.

Faithful replication and repair of the genome are essential processes for all life. Genome maintenance is coordinated by a complex suite of proteins, with bacteria evolving intricate systems despite their relatively simplistic genomes. DNA polymerases are a key class of proteins that mediate genome maintenance. DNA polymerases are all capable of extending nascent strands of DNA but contribute to DNA replication and repair in distinct ways depending on their active site and substrate specificity. The first discovered polymerase, bacterial DNA polymerase I (Pol I), has long been considered the primary enzyme responsible for Okazaki fragment maturation and resynthesis in many DNA repair pathways. These conclusions derive primarily from studies using the gram-negative bacterium, Escherichia coli. Given that some bacterial lineages diverged from E. coli over a billion years ago, these assumptions may not account for evolution in functional diversity. In this review, we examine the structural features of bacterial Pol I and discuss how each of its distinct enzymatic activities contribute to genome maintenance. Throughout, we introduce differences that have been discovered between gram-negative and gram-positive species and explore how activity differences may translate to functional adaptations in replication or repair. We focus on evidence from gram-positive bacteria, particularly Bacillus subtilis and Geobacillus stearothermophilus, that challenges the universality of Pol I's functions and reveals lineage-specific adaptations in replication and repair mechanisms. By synthesizing historical perspectives with recent discoveries, this review underscores both the importance of Pol I and the evolutionary diversification of Pol I in bacterial DNA metabolism.

Bacterial DNA replication↗

PubMed2026

Bacillus subtilis RNase HII Is Inefficient at Processing Guanosine Monophosphate and Damaged Ribonucleotides.

During one round of DNA replication, nearly 2000 ribonucleoside monophosphates (rNMPs) are incorporated in place of their cognate deoxyribonucleoside monophosphates (dNMPs). Given their high rate of insertion, genomic DNA could contain rNMPs that are damaged or mismatched. Here, we test the activity of Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli RNase HII on canonical, mismatched, and damaged rNMPs. We show that E. coli RNase HII is adept at incising most rNMP variants from DNA at similar frequencies, with the exception of an oxidized rNMP, where endoribonuclease activity is sharply reduced. In contrast, B. subtilis RNase HII efficiently incises rAMP, rCMP, and rUMP but is inefficient at processing rGMP in both a canonical and mismatched base pair. We test damaged ribonucleotides and find that B. subtilis RNase HII is refractory to processing abasic and oxidized ribonucleotide lesions. Our work shows that bacterial RNase HII enzymes have different intrinsic endoribonuclease activity toward the repair of canonical, mismatched, and damaged rNMPs, demonstrating that not all rNMP errors provoke efficient resolution. Our finding that B. subtilis RNase HII is recalcitrant to repairing damaged rNMPs resembles what is observed for eukaryotic RNase H2 orthologs, suggesting that other repair processes are necessary to resolve damaged rNMPs.

Bacillus subtilis↗

PubMed2025

Bacillus subtilis RNase HII is inefficient at processing guanosine monophosphate and damaged ribonucleotides.

During one round of DNA replication, nearly 2,000 ribonucleoside monophosphates (rNMPs) are incorporated in place of their cognate deoxyribonucleoside monophosphate (dNMP). Given their high rate of insertion, genomic DNA would contain rNMPs that are damaged or mismatched. Here, we tested the activity of Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli RNase HII on all four canonical, mismatched, and damaged rNMPs. We show that E. coli RNase HII is adept at incising most rNMP variants from DNA at similar frequencies, with the exception of an oxidized rNMP, where endoribonuclease activity is sharply reduced. In contrast, B. subtilis RNase HII efficiently incised rAMP, rCMP, and rUMP, but was inefficient at processing rGMP in both a canonical and mismatched base pair. We tested damaged ribonucleotides and found that B. subtilis RNase HII is refractory to processing abasic and oxidized ribonucleotide lesions. Our work shows that bacterial RNase HII enzymes have different intrinsic endoribonuclease activity toward the repair of canonical, mismatched, and damaged rNMPs, demonstrating that not all rNMP errors provoke efficient resolution. Our finding that B. subtilis RNase HII is recalcitrant to repairing damaged rNMPs resembles what is observed for eukaryotic RNase H2 orthologs, suggesting that other repair processes are necessary to resolve damaged rNMPs.

Bacillus subtilis↗