Biomedical subjects

Lyn S Chitty

Publications and source records attributed to Lyn S Chitty.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2025

Delivering effective genome sequencing in pediatric care: From research in the 100,000 Genomes Project to routine clinical practice.

PURPOSE: Genome sequencing (GS) is increasingly used to investigate rare conditions, primarily in children. The 100,000 Genomes Project (100KG) evaluated GS ahead of implementation in the English National Health Service. In 2020, the National Health Service Genomic Medicine Service (GMS) became the first public health care system to offer GS in routine clinical care. We investigate how learning from 100KG informed GMS service delivery. METHODS: We compare GS outcomes in children tested at a large pediatric hospital via GMS (n = 501) and 100KG research (n = 1759). RESULTS: GMS diagnostic yield (29%) was higher than that in 100KG (22%) (P < .0016). Median age at testing was 8 years in 100KG and 6 in the GMS (P < .05). In 100KG, the diagnostic yield was <10% for 15 indications, none of which are included in GMS testing. 100KG data showed little benefit to application of >3 panels. Use of fewer but larger GMS panels resulted in a significantly higher number of genes tested per patient: median 2801 vs 1373 in 100KG (P < .001). In 100KG, diagnostic yield was not significantly increased by testing more than 3 family members (n = 34/142, 24%). CONCLUSION: Learning from 100KG has informed GS clinical service delivery, resulting in higher diagnostic yields and earlier age at testing. Lessons are broadly applicable to all services providing GS, enabling earlier access to tailored management with fewer investigations.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Costs and cost-effectiveness of returning secondary findings from genomic sequencing based on the return of additional findings in the 100,000 Genomes Project.

PURPOSE: To assess costs and cost-effectiveness of returning additional findings from genome sequencing using data from the 100,000 Genomes Project (100kGP). METHODS: A model-based cost-utility analysis combining yield, consent rates, and cost data from the 100kGP with published estimates of downstream costs and quality-adjusted life years expected to accrue over a lifetime, after the identification of a pathogenic variant. RESULTS: The cost of returning additional findings to participants in the 100kGP was £7.1m or £81 per participant, with a yield of 0.85% for consented participants. The estimated lifetime incremental cost per participant was £125 and quality-adjusted life years 0.004, giving an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £28,830. Implementing a policy of returning additional findings is unlikely to be cost-effective (ie, 13%) at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20,000. A short-term cost of returning findings of £43 per participant or lower (compared with the base case of £81) would result in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of less than £20,000. Alternatively, cost-effectiveness may be improved by returning additional findings to younger patient populations. CONCLUSION: Return of additional findings following genome sequencing for this group of conditions may not be a cost-effective use of health care system resources. Our cost-effectiveness outcomes rely on published estimates and should be validated through long-term follow-up data.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Evaluating the return of additional findings from the 100,000 Genomes Project: A mixed-methods study exploring participant experiences of receiving secondary findings from genomic sequencing.

PURPOSE: The 100,000 Genomes Project participants could consent to receive additional findings (AFs) for variants associated with susceptibility to cancer and familial hypercholesterolemia. Here, we evaluate stakeholder experiences to inform clinical practice. METHODS: Mixed-methods study conducted at 18 sites across England that comprised a cross-sectional survey and interviews with participants who received a positive AF (PAF) and interviews with participants who had no AFs (NAF). RESULTS: There were 146 surveys followed by 35 interviews with PAF participants and 29 interviews with NAF participants. Surveys found that PAF results were seen as useful and would influence health management (82%). Most (90%) had shared their result with family members. Experiences differed by PAF type; cancer PAF participants were often initially shocked and anxious and found telling family members challenging compared with participants with a familial hypercholesterolemia PAF. Although most experiences of NAF results were positive, some misunderstandings were identified. Participants supported returning AFs when offering genome sequencing. CONCLUSION: Patient experiences of receiving AFs were primarily positive, and there is support for offering AFs routinely. Considerations for offering AFs in clinical practice include adapting approaches tailored to individual conditions and greater support for people with a NAF result.

Humans↗