PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Lynda Rajan

Publications and source records attributed to Lynda Rajan.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Including culturally diverse samples in health research: a case study of an urban trial of social support.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the recruitment procedures used in a study of Social Support and Family Health carried out in a disadvantaged urban area of the UK in 1999-2001; to consider the impact of using inclusive recruitment procedures on the final research sample and implications for the conduct of the research and data obtained. DESIGN: Face-to-face recruitment of eligible women, using interpreters where necessary, to a randomized controlled trial of two alternative strategies for providing support to women with infants. RESULTS: Of the 1,263 women eligible to enter the trial, 731 were successfully recruited. Forty-five languages other than English were spoken by eligible women; 14% needed an interpreter for the recruitment visit, and a further 30% spoke English as a second language. Inclusive recruitment practices added significant costs, resulted in a study sample with a different social profile from the sample that would have been achieved without these, and challenged some of the assumptions underlying the model of informed consent commonly used in much health services research. CONCLUSION: Procedures can be developed for recruiting people with diverse cultural backgrounds to take part in research. This helps to address the issue of possible bias in generalizing research findings by increasing external validity, and respects the ethic that everyone should have the right to be eligible for inclusion in research.

Cultural Diversity↗

Evaluating parent support initiatives: lessons from two case studies.

This study describes the characteristics of clients referred to two UK parent support initiatives - Newpin and Home-Start - and documents key aspects of the referral process and clients' responses to the help provided. Data were collected from referral records on 214 families referred during 1992 to four Newpin centres and 349 families referred between April 1994 and March 1995 to four Home-Start schemes. Families were sent questionnaires. Qualitative interview data were collected from a sub-sample of families and from staff and referrers in the Newpin study; volunteers and referrers completed questionnaires in the Home-Start study. Socially disadvantaged families were less likely to return the study questionnaires. The kinds of families and problems referred to the two organizations were very similar. Mothers' loneliness and low emotional well-being were the main reasons for referral; children at risk represented a small part of the caseload. Both Newpin and Home-Start respondents had low levels of support from family and friends. Most referrals were made by health visitors, and there was a significant problem of non use among referred families. Most users of Newpin and Home-Start were enthusiastic about the help provided. Common difficulties in family life, such as poverty, stress and low social support, make up an increasing part of the workload of health professionals and social workers, and of voluntary sector initiatives for supporting parents. This study raises questions about the claims such initiatives may make about their effectiveness in reaching and providing help to 'at risk' families. Further evaluation of such schemes is needed to provide a sound evidence-base for policy and purchasing decisions.

Journal Article↗