PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Lynn Griffin

Publications and source records attributed to Lynn Griffin.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

"There's no point in complaining, nothing changes": rural disaffection with complaints as an improvement method.

OBJECTIVE: To validate earlier findings that lack of access to health services is the most likely issue of complaint by rural consumers, and that lack of knowledge about how to make effective complaints and scepticism that responses to complaints bring about service improvement account for the under-representation of complaints from rural consumers. DESIGN: Unaddressed reply-paid mail survey to 100% of households in small communities, and 50%, 20% or 10% in progressively larger communities. SETTING: Eight communities in the Loddon-Mallee region of Victoria. PARTICIPANTS: 983 householders most responsible for the health care of household members, responding to a mailed questionnaire. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Issues of complaints actually made; issues of unsatisfactory situations when a complaint was not made; reasons for not complaining; to whom complaints are made; and plans for dealing with any future complaint. RESULTS: Earlier findings were confirmed. Lack of access to health services was the most important issue, indicated by 54.8% of those who had made a complaint, and 72% of those who wanted to but did not. The most common reason given for not complaining was that it was futile to do so. Lack of knowledge of how to make effective complaints which might contribute to the quality assurance cycle was evident. CONCLUSIONS: Rural consumers' disaffection with health complaints as a means to quality improvement poses a significant barrier to consumer engagement in quality assurance processes. Provider practices may need to change to regain community confidence in quality improvement processes.

Adolescent↗

Unusually persistent complainants.

BACKGROUND: Querulous paranoia may have disappeared from the psychiatric literature, but is it flourishing in modern complaints organisations and the courts? AIMS: To investigate the unusually persistent complainants who lay waste to their own lives and place inordinate demands and stress on complaints organisations. METHOD: Complaints officers completed questionnaires on both unusually persistent complainants and matched controls. RESULTS: Persistent complainants (distinguished by their pursuit of vindication and retribution) consumed time and resources and resorted to both direct and veiled threats. Attempts to distinguish these people from a control group on the basis of the manner in which their claims were initially managed failed. CONCLUSIONS: Persistent complainants' pursuit of vindication and retribution fits badly with complaints systems established to deliver reparation and compensation. These complainants damaged the financial and social fabric of their own lives and frightened those dealing with their claims. The study suggests methods of early detection and alternative management strategies.

Agonistic Behavior↗

Unpaid radiology claims in New Jersey: incidence and financial implications.

OBJECTIVE: Nonpayment of claims by insurers may lead to major financial losses by physicians. These losses may far exceed the losses from late payment that we studied previously, although it is late payment that has been the primary focus of legislation enacted in 47 states. This article quantifies the loss to radiologists from nonpayment of claims submitted to payers on behalf of patients with insurance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed all claims (48,217) submitted in February, June, and October 2000 to six major payers by a common third-party billing company on behalf of 11 radiology practices in New Jersey. Claims were categorized as unpaid (unpaid > 170 days after submission), paid timely (within 40 days of submission, the criterion of the New Jersey Prompt-Pay Act, effective December 28, 1999), or paid late (40-170 days after submission). A detailed analysis of 5,638 claims from the practice of two of the authors was used to estimate a "clean claims" (claims without defect or need for substantiation) submission rate. RESULTS: The revenue loss from unpaid claims was approximately $156,000, which was 28 times the loss of interest that should, according to law, have been paid on the delayed paid claims. Of the unpaid claims, the payers never disputed 68%, involving approximately $106,000. CONCLUSION: The financial consequences of unpaid claims far exceed those associated with late payment, even omitting all unpaid claims that were disputed by payers. Legislation coupled with active enforcement should address this large problem of unpaid claims, which is many times larger than the already legislatively targeted problem of late payment.

Health Maintenance Organizations↗