Biomedical subjects

M A Amato

Publications and source records attributed to M A Amato.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Entropy of classical systems with long-range interactions.

We discuss the form of the entropy for classical Hamiltonian systems with long-range interaction using the Vlasov equation which describes the dynamics of a N particle in the limit N-->infinity. The stationary states of the Hamiltonian system are subject to infinite conserved quantities due to the Vlasov dynamics. We show that the stationary states correspond to an extremum of the Boltzmann-Gibbs entropy, and their stability is obtained from the condition that this extremum is a maximum. As a consequence, the entropy is a function of an infinite set of Lagrange multipliers that depend on the initial condition. We also discuss in this context the meaning of ensemble inequivalence and the temperature.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2004

Hedgehog signaling in vertebrate eye development: a growing puzzle.

The vertebrate retina has been widely used as a model to study the development of the central nervous system. Its accessibility and relatively simple organization allow analysis of basic mechanisms such as cell proliferation, differentiation and death. For this reason, it could represent an ideal place to solve the puzzle of Hh signaling during neural development. However, the extensive wealth of data, sometimes apparently discordant, has made the retina one of the most complicated models for studying the role of the Hh cascade. Given the complexity of the field, a deep analysis of the data arising from different animal models is essential. In this review, we will compare and discuss all reported roles of Hh signaling in eye development to shed light on its multiple functions.

Animals↗

PubMed1993

When similarity is a liability: effects of sex-based preferential selection on reactions to like-sex and different-sex others.

In 2 laboratory studies, 145 male and female undergraduates were selected for the role of manager either on the basis of merit or preferentially on the basis of their sex. Results of the first study indicated that when female subjects had been selected preferentially as compared with on a merit basis, they reacted more negatively to female (but not to male) applicants for an entry-level position in terms of personnel evaluations and competence ratings and they recommended female applicants for hire less frequently and less enthusiastically. No differences in personnel evaluations were found as a result of preferential selection when subjects were male (Study 1) or when subjects were provided with favorable information about their ability (Study 2). Implications for implementation of affirmative action programs are discussed.

Adolescent↗