PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M A Bookman

Publications and source records attributed to M A Bookman.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Phase I trial of multiple cycles of high-dose carboplatin, paclitaxel, and topotecan with peripheral-blood stem-cell support as front-line therapy.

PURPOSE: To determine the safety and feasibility of delivering multiple cycles of front-line high-dose carboplatin, paclitaxel, and topotecan with peripheral-blood stem-cell (PBSC) support. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were required to have a malignant solid tumor for which they had received no prior chemotherapy. Mobilization of PBSC was achieved with either filgrastim alone or in combination with cyclophosphamide and paclitaxel. Patients then received three or four cycles of high-dose carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve [AUC] 16), paclitaxel (250 mg/m(2)), and topotecan (10-15 mg/m(2)), with the latter two agents administered as 24-hour infusions and supported with PBSC and filgrastim. Cycles were repeated every 28 days. RESULTS: Twenty patients were enrolled onto the trial and were assessable for toxicity and clinical outcome. Dose-limiting toxicities were stomatitis and prolonged hematopoietic recovery. The maximum-tolerated dose of topotecan was 12.5 mg/m(2) when given with high-dose carboplatin and paclitaxel for three cycles. Four cycles were able to be given with a dose of topotecan of 10 mg/m(2). The pharmacokinetics of each compound were not affected by the other agents. Eleven (85%) of 13 patients with assessable disease responded. CONCLUSION: Multiple cycles of high-dose carboplatin, paclitaxel, and topotecan can be safely administered with filgrastim and PBSC support. The recommended doses for phase II study are carboplatin AUC 16, paclitaxel 250 mg/m(2), and topotecan 10 mg/m(2). Trials are currently being conducted with this regimen as front-line treatment in patients with advanced ovarian cancer and extensive small-cell carcinoma. This approach remains experimental and should be used only in the context of a clinical trial.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Developmental chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer: incorporation of topoisomerase-I inhibitors and perspective of the Gynecologic Oncology Group.

Despite improvements in median and overall survival using a combination of platinum and paclitaxel, long-term survival rates for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) remain disappointing, and the development of more effective primary therapy remains a priority. In particular, several interesting chemotherapy agents have demonstrated activity individually in patients with recurrent EOC. Among these are gemcitabine, topotecan, liposomal doxorubicin, and prolonged oral etoposide. Preclinical models have suggested an advantage for combinations of these agents with platinum, which has been attributed to inhibition of DNA synthetic pathways involved in the repair of platinum-DNA adducts. However, efforts to develop multidrug combinations with platinum and paclitaxel have encountered substantial bone marrow toxicity, prompting exploration of alternative schedules and sequences of drug administration. In this regard, the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) has conducted a series of phase I pilot studies in previously untreated patients to define combinations that are suitable for group-wide phase III trials. With international collaboration, GOG has launched a five-arm trial (GOG-0182) that will compare these combinations against carboplatin-paclitaxel. The selection of candidate regimens for this trial illustrate the challenges of drug development in EOC.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2000

Topotecan in squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: A Phase II study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group.

PURPOSE: The activity and toxicity of topotecan were evaluated in a multicenter Phase II study for patients with previously treated squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Histologic confirmation of the primary diagnosis was required, as well as adequate performance status and vital organ function and the presence of measurable disease. Patients were allowed one prior regimen of systemic therapy, usually platinum-based. A two-stage accrual design was utilized with early stopping criteria and monitoring of toxicity. Topotecan was administered at 1.5 mg/m(2) per day for 5 consecutive days on a 21-day cycle with modifications based on hematologic toxicity. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were entered. Two patients were ineligible (incorrect tumor type) and 2 were inevaluable (never received therapy). One additional patient was not evaluable for response (nonmeasurable disease). A median of 2 cycles was administered to each patient (range: 1-17 cycles) with grade 4 neutropenia in 68% and grade 4 thrombocytopenia in 39% of patients, but without treatment-related deaths. Nonhematologic toxicity was generally mild and not dose-limiting. The overall (complete and partial) response rate among evaluable patients with measurable disease was 12.5% with stable disease in an additional 37. 5%. Median progression-free survival was 2.1 months. CONCLUSIONS: As a single agent topotecan shows modest antitumor activity, with manageable hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity, in patients with previously treated squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. Further evaluation in chemotherapy-naive patients or in combination with cisplatin and/or radiation may be indicated.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Topotecan has substantial antitumor activity as first-line salvage therapy in platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian carcinoma: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.

PURPOSE: Topotecan is known to be active in recurrent ovarian cancer, but most prior studies have focused on platinum-resistant or refractory populations. This study was undertaken to define the response rate and progression-free interval in platinum-sensitive patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with recurrent ovarian cancer after one or two prior chemotherapy regimens and in whom the interval between prior platinum therapy and the initiation of protocol therapy was greater than 6 months were treated with topotecan 1.5 mg/m(2) intravenously over 30 minutes daily for 5 days, with this cycle repeated every 21 days. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were entered onto the study; 47 were assessable for toxicity and 46 for response. The response rate was 33% (two complete responses and 13 partial responses), with a median response duration of 11.2 months. Hematologic toxicity predominated but was manageable in most patients with frequent incorporation of cytokines and RBC and platelet transfusions. Fatigue was reported in 15 patients and resulted in the discontinuation of therapy in five responding patients. CONCLUSION: Topotecan is an active drug in platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer, with significant but manageable hematologic toxicity. Fatigue is also a common problem that may be dose-limiting in some patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Second-line treatment of ovarian cancer.

Patients with epithelial ovarian cancer are often diagnosed with advanced-stage disease. Although clinical complete remissions are obtained in the majority of patients through a combination of cytoreductive surgery and chemotherapy, relapse is common. A number of agents with diverse biologic mechanisms have been identified with activity in the setting of recurrent disease. Strategies for management of patients with recurrent disease, including classification, treatment goals, and therapeutic options will be reviewed.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2000

Using tumor registry resources in analyzing concordance with guidelines and outcomes.

Collection and analysis of standardized multi-institutional outcomes data is a labor-intensive process. As the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) seeks to expand its Outcomes Database to include multiple primary tumor types, the amount of time and effort required for detailed data abstraction and transmission will become an obstacle for many primary institutions. In addition, as the NCCN Guidelines become more widely distributed and adopted in the oncology community, it would be appealing to evaluate guideline concordance and quality of care in community hospitals and community-based physician practices vs major cancer centers. However, methods for case finding and collection of detailed outcomes data in the community setting are not well established. Most cancer centers and community hospitals have already set aside resources for maintaining a local tumor registry that includes limited information on demographics, diagnosis, staging, treatment, and survival for all new cancer patients treated at the specific institution. One strategy that can be used to facilitate a global outcomes program within the NCCN community calls for capitalizing on existing local database resources and experienced coding and data management staff.

Health Resources↗
PubMed1999

Phase I trial of multiple cycles of high-dose chemotherapy supported by autologous peripheral-blood stem cells.

PURPOSE: To determine the safety and feasibility of delivering multiple cycles of front-line high-dose carboplatin and paclitaxel with hematopoietic peripheral-blood stem cell (PBSC) support. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were required to have a malignant solid tumor for which they had received no prior chemotherapy. Mobilization of PBSC was achieved with cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). After one cycle of conventional-dose carboplatin and cyclophosphamide with GM-CSF, patients received multiple cycles of high-dose carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve [AUC], 12 to 20) and paclitaxel (250 mg/m(2)) with PBSC and GM-CSF repeated every 28 days. RESULTS: Twenty-four of 28 patients were assessable for toxicity and clinical outcome. Dose-limiting toxicities were dehydration, diarrhea, and electrolyte imbalances. The maximum-tolerated dose of carboplatin was AUC 16 (equivalent to a median of 1,189 mg/m(2)). The relationship of target AUC to measured AUC was linear (r(2) =. 29; P =.0011). The overall response rate was 96%, with a complete clinical response rate of 67%. The median time to progression from the first PBSC reinfusion was 49.5 weeks (range, 8 to 156+ weeks). CONCLUSION: Multiple cycles of high-dose carboplatin (AUC 16) and paclitaxel (250 mg/m(2)) can be safely administered with GM-CSF and PBSC support. Although this regimen is safe, feasible, and active, the use of multiple cycles of high-dose chemotherapy as front-line treatment remains experimental and should only be used in the context of a clinical trial.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Extending the platinum-free interval in recurrent ovarian cancer: the role of topotecan in second-line chemotherapy.

Although the combination of platinum and paclitaxel offers effective chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer, the majority of women will eventually relapse with development of drug-resistant disease. Topotecan is the most extensively studied agent currently available for management of recurrent ovarian cancer and has been approved by the FDA for that particular indication. Early use of topotecan offers an effective and tolerable strategy that can prolong the platinum-free interval and optimize subsequent retreatment with platinum.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed1998

Topotecan for the treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: an open-label phase II study in patients treated after prior chemotherapy that contained cisplatin or carboplatin and paclitaxel.

PURPOSE: Topotecan, a topoisomerase I inhibitor, was evaluated in a multicenter, phase II study of women with epithelial ovarian carcinoma who relapsed after one or two prior regimens that included platinum and paclitaxel. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Topotecan 1.5 mg/m2 daily was administered as a 30-minute infusion for 5 consecutive days on a 21-day cycle. Eligibility criteria included bidimensionally measurable disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or less, and adequate bone marrow, liver, and renal function. Efficacy was assessed by independent radiologic review. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-nine patients were treated; 81% were platinum resistant. Sixty-two patients had received one prior regimen and 77 patients had received two prior regimens. Nine patients were not assessable for response; however, all patients were included in the response analysis. The overall response rate was 13.7%; 12.4% in platinum-resistant and 19.2% in platinum-sensitive patients. Stable disease lasted at least 8 weeks in 27.3% of the patients. The median duration of response and time to progression were 18.1 and 12.1 weeks, respectively. The median survival was 47.0 weeks. Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 82% of the patients (34% of the courses) and thrombocytopenia in 30% of the patients (9% of the courses). Infectious complications occurred in 6% of the courses. Nonhematologic toxicities were mild. There were no drug-related toxic deaths. CONCLUSION: As a single agent, topotecan has modest activity in women with advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma who have progressed or not responded after one or two prior regimens with platinum and paclitaxel. Further investigation of combination regimens is indicated in the primary therapy for ovarian cancer based on the mechanism of action and tolerability.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Web-based resources for clinical protocol management.

The data monitoring regulatory procedures, and administrative tasks associated with protocol management have become increasingly complex. Relational database technology and Internet-based connectivity offer resources to improve the quality and efficiency of protocol operations. At Fox Chase Cancer Center, we have developed a suite of database applications for protocol management and tracking of patient accrual. All data transactions and reporting occur through a graphical web browser interface using standard Internet technology. Security and confidentiality have been addressed through encryption, user authentication, address restriction, and database authority. Database management has been tightly integrated with protocol operations to avoid duplication of resources and effort. Data query functions also extend to other institutional resources, such as tumor registry and the hospital clinical laboratory, to further reduce the need for redundant data storage. Newer components, such as chemotherapy orders and toxicity reporting, have been incorporated in a modular fashion. Although custom software development can be expensive and time-consuming, it offers the best opportunity for successful integration with existing resources, staff, and procedures, as well as collaboration with other institutions.

Clinical Protocols↗
PubMed1998

Biological therapy of ovarian cancer: current directions.

Despite recent advances in the chemotherapy of ovarian cancer, the development of alternative therapies that retain activity against drug-resistant tumors remains a high priority. Our knowledge regarding growth factors, cytokines, and the immune response continues to expand, and molecular biology has provided an increased diversity of reagents for clinical evaluation. This review focuses on regulatory targets in ovarian cancer, including Her2/neu (c-erbB2) and other growth factor receptors; interferons, interleukins, and other immunoregulatory cytokines; cellular adhesion molecules; antigen-specific T lymphocytes and adoptive immunotherapy; choice of monoclonal antibody reagents and advances in antibody engineering, including recombinant single-chain binding sites, chimeric proteins, radioconjugates, cytotoxic drug conjugates, immunotoxins, and bispecific antibodies. Although specific roles for biologic therapy in the management of ovarian cancer have yet to be defined, current priorities for clinical research are reviewed.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗
PubMed1997

Short-course intravenous prophylaxis for paclitaxel-related hypersensitivity reactions.

PURPOSE: To estimate the incidence of hypersensitivity reactions using a short-course intravenous prophylactic regimen in patients receiving outpatient therapy with paclitaxel. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were identified from a retrospective search of a computerized pharmacy database covering a two-year period from January 1994 through December 1995. Eligible outpatients received paclitaxel as a one- to three-hour infusion 30 minutes after intravenous dexamethasone (10 or 20 mg), diphenhydramine (50 mg), and cimetidine (300 mg) or ranitidine (50 mg). Charts from all patients were then manually reviewed to verify drug administration and to record any evidence of hypersensitivity reactions during the first two cycles of therapy. RESULTS: A total of 283 outpatients were identified from the pharmacy database and all charts reviewed. All patients received intravenous dexamethasone (5 to 20 mg) 30 minutes prior to paclitaxel without prior oral dexamethasone. Hypersensitivity reactions were documented in 13 patients (4.6%) during the first or second cycle with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 2.2% to 7.0%. Reactions resolved rapidly without sequelae and did not require hospitalization. Only two reactions (0.7%) were graded as serious with a 95% CI of 0.2% to 1.2%, based on the use of bronchodilators and presence of angioedema. Therapy was continued with modification in 10 patients without recurrent hypersensitivity reaction. Therapy was discontinued in two patients without rechallenge and discontinued in one patient after rechallenge with a recurrent hypersensitivity reaction. CONCLUSION: A short-course single-dose regimen of intravenous dexamethasone, diphenhydramine, and cimetidine (or ranitidine) offers a safe and convenient alternative for prevention of hypersensitivity reactions associated with outpatient paclitaxel administration.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Phase I trial and pharmacologic trial of sequences of paclitaxel and topotecan in previously treated ovarian epithelial malignancies: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

PURPOSE: A phase I and pharmacologic study to evaluate the feasibility of administering paclitaxel (PTX) in combination with topotecan (TPT) without and with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in women with recurrent or refractory ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: TPT was administered as a 30-minute infusion daily for 5 days and PTX was given as a 24-hour infusion (PTX-24) either before TPT on day 1 or after TPT on day 5. Each patient received both schedules on an alternating basis every 3 weeks. Sequential dose escalation of TPT or PTX-24 without and with G-CSF resulted in five dosage permutations of TPT/PTX (mg/ m2): 0.75/135 without G-CSF and 0.75/135, 1.25/135, 1.50/135, and 1.25/170 with G-CSF. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients received 109 courses of therapy. Dose-limiting myelosuppression consistently occurred at the first TPT/PTX-24 dose level (0.75/135 mg/m2) in the absence of G-CSF support. Although the addition of G-CSF resulted in reduced rates of complicated neutropenia, the incidences of dose-limiting neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were unacceptably high after the doses of either TPT or PTX-24 were increased. Paired analysis showed similar hematologic toxicities between the two sequences of drug administration. The pharmacologic behavior of both TPT and PTX-24 was not altered by drug sequencing. Major antitumor responses occurred in 40% of patients with measurable and assessable disease, including 45% and 9% of patients with potentially cisplatin-sensitive and -resistant tumors, respectively. CONCLUSION: The recommended doses of TPT on a daily times-five schedule combined with PTX-24 in these patients were 0.75 mg/m2/d and 135 mg/m2, respectively, with G-CSF support. Although this dose of PTX has significant single-agent activity in ovarian cancer, the dose of TPT is much lower than the TPT dose at which single-agent activity has been observed. Due to the inability to administer near relevant single-agent doses of both drugs in combination, as well as the requirement for G-CSF support, further evaluations of this regimen in women with refractory or recurrent ovarian cancer are necessary before it can be recommended for previously treated patients in this setting.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Intravenous prophylaxis for paclitaxel-related hypersensitivity reactions.

Severe hypersensitivity reactions to paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) were reported during early phase I trials. A premedication regimen consisting of oral steroids 12 and 6 hours before treatment with paclitaxel as well as immediate infusion of diphenhydramine and cimetidine (or ranitidine) before paclitaxel markedly decreased the incidence of hypersensitivity reactions. Subsequently, investigators at the Fox Chase Cancer Center used intravenous dexamethasone, diphenhydramine, and cimetidine immediately before paclitaxel in an effort to obviate the inconvenience of oral steroid administration. Two prospective clinical trials that use carboplatin and paclitaxel were performed in patients with ovarian cancer and in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. In both these trials, all premedication for hypersensitivity reactions was administered intravenously immediately before paclitaxel. No significant hypersensitivity reactions were reported in these two trials, and, subsequently, a large retrospective search of a computerized pharmacy database concluded that a single-dose regimen of intravenous dexamethasone, diphenhydramine, and cimetidine is a safe and convenient alternative for prevention of hypersensitivity reactions associated with outpatient paclitaxel administration.

Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal↗
PubMed1996

A phase II trial of merbarone (NSC 336628) in the treatment of recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma. A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma who progress through a cisplatin-based regimen or recur less than 6 months after discontinuing cisplatin, have limited therapeutic options. The Gynecologic Oncology Group conducted a Phase II trial of merbarone in this patient population. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma who had previously received one prior cisplatin-based regimen were scheduled to receive 1000 mg/m2 of merbarone by continuous intravenous infusion through a central line each day for five days every four weeks. RESULTS: Of the 27 patients entered, one was ineligible because of wrong primary, and two never received the drug, leaving 24 patients evaluable for toxicity. Twenty of 24 were evaluable for response. The regimen was well tolerated with only one episode each of GOG grade 3 leukopenia (4%) or grade 4 granulocytopenia (4%). There was one episode (4%) of GOG grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity. Prior to increasing the infusate concentration to 4 mg/ml, there was one episode (4%) of altered mental status which, in retrospect, may have been secondary to iatrogenic hyponatremia. There were two partial responses (10%) (95% confidence interval 1.2-31.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Merbarone exhibited minimal activity at this schedule in this pretreated group of patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Phase I trial of buthionine sulfoximine in combination with melphalan in patients with cancer.

PURPOSE AND METHODS: Resistance to alkylating agents and platinum compounds is associated with elevated levels of glutathione (GSH). Depletion of GSH by buthionine sulfoximine (BSO) restores the sensitivity of resistant tumors to melphalan in vitro and in vivo. In a phase I trial, each patient received two cycles as follows: BSO alone intravenously (i.v.) every 12 hours for six doses, and 1 week later the same BSO as cycle one with melphalan (L-PAM) 15 mg/m2 i.v. 1 hour after the fifth dose. BSO doses were escalated from 1.5 to 17 g/m2 in 41 patients. RESULTS: The only toxicity attributable to BSO was grade I or II nausea/vomiting in 50% of patients. Dose-related neutropenia required an L-PAM dose reduction to 10 mg/m2 at BSO 7.5 g/m2. We measured GSH in peripheral mononuclear cells (PMN), and in tumor biopsies when available, at intervals following BSO dosing. In PMNs, GSH content decreased over 36 to 72 hours to reach a nadir on day 3; at the highest dose, recovery was delayed beyond day 7. The mean PMN GSH nadirs were approximately 10% of control at BSO doses > or = 7.5 g/m2; at 13 and 17 g/m2, all but two patients had nadir values in this range. GSH was depleted in sequential tumor biopsies to a variable extent, but with a similar time course. At BSO doses > or = 13 g/m2, tumor GSH was < or = 20% of starting values on day 3 in five of seven patients; recovery had not occurred by day 5. We measured plasma concentrations of R- and S-BSO by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) in 22 patients throughout the dosing period. Total-body clearance (CLt) and volume of distribution at steady-state (Vss) for both isomers were dose-independent. The CLt of S-BSO was significantly less than that of R-BSO at all doses, but no significant differences in Vss were observed between the racemates. Harmonic mean half-lives were 1.39 hours and 1.89 hours for R-BSO and S-BSO, respectively. CONCLUSION: A biochemically appropriate dose of BSO for use on this schedule is 13 g/m2, which will be used in phase II trials to be conducted in ovarian cancer and melanoma.

Adult↗