Genetic screening by insurance carriers.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to M A Dewar.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The impact of legal issues in breast cancer care reflects the significance of breast cancer as a health concern of women. Breast cancer has emerged as a leading liability risk for primary care physicians, with most cases focusing on delayed diagnosis. Although the clinical impact of delayed diagnosis of breast cancer is often controversial, physicians should strive to diagnose breast cancer as early as possible in the natural history of the disease. No currently available data suggest that a delay of less than 2 months between the onset of symptoms and diagnosis or treatment adversely influences outcome. Techniques that help physicians reduce the liability risks associated with breast cancer care include patient education, adequate documentation and follow-up, and referral or consultation in high-risk situations.
Population screening for cervical cancer resulted in significant reduction in the morbidity and mortality from cervical cancer. An increased understanding of the relationship of HPV infection with cervical cancer and the natural history of cervical cancer precursor lesions further solidifies and expands the biological basis for cervical cancer screening. Pap tests in asymptomatic women remain the cornerstone of cervical cancer screening. Clinicians should be cognizant of the significant false-negative rate of Pap smears. Meticulous attention to proper Pap smear technique is necessary to maximize the sensitivity of the test. Further research is needed to establish the role of cervicography and HPV DNA hybridization techniques in cervical cancer screening.
The success of the Pap smear in screening for cervical cancer illustrates many of the tenets of screening for disease. Unfortunately, no other gynecologic malignancy shares this success. Detection of most gynecologic malignancies occurs once they have become symptomatic and on clinical examination at the interval cancer-related checkup as recommended by the ACS. These examinations, done yearly in women older than 40 and every 3 years in younger women, can go a long way in the detection of genital tract disease. In detecting vulvar neoplasms, visual inspection of the entire perineum coupled with palpation to include Bartholin's glands and early biopsy of suspicious vulvar lesions promotes earlier diagnosis. Self-examination similar to breast self-examination and increased patient awareness are potential education goals for physicians as well as cancer and medical societies. Vaginal examination at the cancer checkup should continue. The finding that most vaginal cancers are picked up by abnormal cytology while they are still asymptomatic argues strongly for Pap testing after menopause. The knowledge that women who are status posthysterectomy for benign disease are not protected from developing vaginal cancers mandates continued Pap testing in this population as well. Because endometrial cancer is common, primary care physicians should maintain a high index of suspicion. Aspiration biopsy is a simple office-based procedure with low risk and good yield, and any woman in the perimenopausal and postmenopausal period who presents with atypical bleeding patterns should be evaluated. Although not recommended as a general screening test, the ACS does advocate endometrial sampling in the high risk woman at the time of menopause. The greatest challenge to primary care physicians may be the early detection of ovarian cancer. No single test is available, nor is any advocated in screening for this lethal disease. Currently, only periodic physical examination is recommended at the cancer checkup interval. Ultrasound, both transabdominal and transvaginal, may help in detecting adnexal masses, but is not sensitive enough to differentiate benign from malignant lesions. In this setting, and in the patient with suspected ovarian cancer, CA 125 and AFP may be helpful in determining which patients require surgical exploration. Women with positive family histories for ovarian cancer require greater vigilance and close follow-up with serial ultrasound and CA 125 determinations. As the population ages, cancer, which is primarily a disease of age, will continue to increase in incidence.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Evaluation of the patient with metastasis of unknown origin should be structured to quickly identify treatable tumors or the need for palliation while avoiding prolonged hospital stays and testing that will result in neither improved treatment nor better prognosis. The evaluation should be symptom-directed and pathologically oriented. It is the responsibility of the family physician in caring for a patient with MUO to ensure that communication is facilitated between surgeon, oncologist, pathologist, and patient. The physical examination should include thyroid, breasts, pelvic, and rectal examinations. General lab analyses should include fecal occult blood testing, complete blood count, urinalysis, serum calcium, and liver function studies. Men should have assays for prostate-specific antigen and serum prostatic acid phosphatase. Women should undergo mammography and pelvic ultrasound. Undifferentiated carcinoma is likely to originate from either small cell bronchogenic, lymphoma, or germ cell, and thus, serum should be assayed for HCG and AFP. Further radiologic studies, in the absence of specific symptoms, should be limited to chest radiographs and abdominal CT. Contrast studies should be included only if there is organ dysfunction. Biopsy of the malignant tissue should be done early, and studies should include histochemistry, immunohistology, and electron microscopy. Tissues from female patients should be studied for estrogen and progesterone receptors. When a biopsy is planned, advance communication between the family physician or surgeon and the pathologist greatly increases the chance of identifying a primary site. It is important that the surgeon obtain sufficient material to enable study, not only by standard histologic techniques, but also by electron microscopy, special stains, estrogen receptor activity, hormonal markers, and tumor markers. Treatment of patients for whom a primary tumor remains undiscovered must include toxic therapies only for those with good functional status who are likely to respond. Therapy must be pursued for palliation of symptoms when they develop. As physicians, we must control the urge to do something at those times when doing nothing is more appropriate. We must provide continuous support for both the patient and family, protecting to the best of our ability their quality of life. A physician should never convey the impression that it is "not cost-effective" to look for the source of a patient's malignancy. It can be emphasized that further search for a primary tumor carries both medical risk and expense, yet is unlikely to locate the primary tumor or improve the response to therapy or the quality of life.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)