Biomedical subjects

M A Dimopoulos

Publications and source records attributed to M A Dimopoulos.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed2005

Adjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin in non-endometrioid carcinoma of the uterus.

PURPOSE OF INVESTIGATION: Uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC) and uterine clear cell carcinoma (UCCC) represent more aggressive tumors than the more common endometroid cancers, exhibiting a propensity for distant metastasis. The aim of this study was to investigate the activity and safety of paclitaxel/carboplatin chemotherapy as the only adjuvant treatment in patients with surgically resected UPSC and UCCC. METHODS: Fifteen patients with Stage IB-IV UPSC or UCCC were treated with a mean of six courses of paclitaxel 175 mg/m3 plus carboplatin AUC 5 at three-week intervals, three to six weeks after undergoing surgery with curative intent. No patient had residual disease after surgery and none underwent pre- or post-chemotherapy irradiation. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 29.4 months, six patients (40%) relapsed and two (13%) died of disease. Mean time to recurrence was 16.9 months. Recurrence rate per Stage was 17% for Stage IB/C, 57% for Stage IIIA/C and 50% for Stage IV. Projected 5-year overall survival and progression-free survival was 79.7% and 55.7%, respectively. All relapses were abdominopelvic whereas in one case pelvic recurrence was accompanied by lung metastasis. The most frequent grade 3-4 toxicity was neutropenia. CONCLUSION: Chemotherapy with paclitaxel plus carboplatin is feasible and possibly prevents distant metastasis when used as adjuvant in UPSC and UCCC.

Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell↗

PubMed2004

Adjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with advanced carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: a study by the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group.

PURPOSE: Radical surgery represents the treatment of choice for carcinoma of the upper urinary tract. Nevertheless, approximately 50% of patients with stage T >/= 3 or lymph node involvement die from their disease, mainly as a result of the development of distant metastases. Therefore, there is a need for effective adjuvant systemic treatment. We prospectively studied a cohort of patients who underwent surgery for high-risk carcinoma of the upper urinary tract to assess the feasibility of the combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin as adjuvant treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-six patients with tumor stage >/= 3 or lymph node involvement were treated with four cycles of paclitaxel at 175 mg/m(2) and carboplatin (area under the curve 5, Calvert Formula) every 3 weeks following surgery. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 40.6 months. Chemotherapy was well tolerated with 32 patients (89%) receiving full carboplatin and paclitaxel doses without delays. The most frequent grade 3/4 toxicity was neutropenia (39%), which was complicated with fever in only one case (3%). Nonhematologic grade 3 or 4 toxicities were reported in only one case. Five-year survival was 52% (95% CI, 35% to 69%), while 5-year disease-free survival was 40.2% (95% CI, 15.8% to 64.6%). Local failure rate was 30%, as opposed to 17% of patients who developed distant metastases. No patients with grade 2 tumors relapsed during follow-up, as opposed to 60% of patients with grade 3 tumors. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin is feasible and may reduce the risk of distant metastases in high-risk upper urinary tract carcinoma.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel and cisplatin in patients with high-risk resectable bladder carcinoma: long term results.

OBJECTIVES: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been used to improve outcome after cystectomy or for selection for bladder preservation in patients with bladder cancer. We have shown encouraging results using docetaxel and cisplatin in patients with advanced urothelial cancer. We are reporting the results of a phase II study using this combination as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer. METHODS: Fifty patients were treated with docetaxel and cisplatin at 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks for 3 cycles prior to cystectomy. Median follow-up was 70.2 months. RESULTS: Chemotherapy was well tolerated. 5-year survival and progression-free survival (PFS) were 51.92% (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 37.76-66.08) and 52.47% (95%CI: 37.99-66.95). Multivariate analysis showed that clinical stage (cT) < or = 3a was associated with improved 5-year survival (86.42% vs. 40.81%, p = 0.027). Forty one patients underwent cystectomy. No tumor was found in 15 cases (36.6%). 5-year survival was 60.34% (95%CI: 52.2-68.48) and PFS was 57.11% (95%CI: 41.29-72.93). Absence of residual tumor was associated with improved 5-year survival (93.33% vs. 40.72%, p = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel and cisplatin is feasible and produced high pathological complete remission rate and excellent outcome in patients with no residual tumor.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Primary treatment of multiple myeloma with thalidomide, vincristine, liposomal doxorubicin and dexamethasone (T-VAD doxil): a phase II multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation after initial cytoreductive chemotherapy with the combination vincristine, doxorubicin and dexamethasone (VAD) is considered an effective therapy for many patients with newly diagnosed, symptomatic multiple myeloma. Response to initial cytoreductive chemotherapy is important for the long-term outcome of such patients. Thalidomide has recently shown significant antimyeloma activity. We studied the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of a liposomal doxorubicin-containing VAD regimen with thalidomide, administered on an outpatient basis, as initial cytoreductive treatment in previously untreated patients with symptomatic myeloma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine myeloma patients were treated with vincristine 2 mg intravenously (i.v.), liposomal doxorubicin 40 mg/m(2) i.v. administered as single dose on day 1, and dexamethasone 40 mg per os daily for 4 days. Dexamethasone was also given on days 15-18 of the first cycle of treatment. The regimen was administered every 4 weeks for four courses. Thalidomide was given daily at a dose of 200 mg at bedtime. Response to treatment was evaluated after four cycles of treatment. After completion of four cycles, the patients were allowed to proceed to high-dose chemotherapy or to receive two additional cycles of the same treatment. RESULTS: On an intention-to-treat basis, 29 of the 39 patients (74%) responded to treatment. Four patients (10%) achieved complete and 25 (64%) partial response. Three patients (8%) showed minor response and seven (18%) were rated as non-responders. Major grade 3 or 4 toxicities consisted of neutropenia (15%), thrombocytopenia (15%), deep vein thrombosis (10%), constipation (10%), skin rash (5%) and peripheral neuropathy (5%). Two patients (5%) experienced early death due to infection. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of vincristine, liposomal doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (VAD doxil) with thalidomide is an effective and relatively well-tolerated initial cytoreductive treatment. Prospective randomized studies are required in order to assess the effect of this regimen on the long-term outcome of patients with multiple myeloma.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Thalidomide in cancer medicine.

Thalidomide, an oral agent with antiangiogenic and immunomodulatory properties, is being investigated extensively in the management of advanced cancer. Multiple studies with large numbers of patients have confirmed that this drug has significant activity in multiple myeloma. Some patients with myelofibrosis or myeodysplatic syndromes may reduce their need for transfusions after thalidomide treatment. The activity of thalidomide in solid tumors is less prominent. Studies in Kaposi's sarcoma, malignant melanoma, renal cell carcinoma and prostate cancer appear more promising especially when thalidomide is combined with biological agents or with chemotherapy. Limited activity was demonstrated in patients with glioma, while thalidomide appears to be inactive in patients with head and neck cancer, breast or ovarian cancer.

Angiogenesis Inhibitors↗

PubMed2004

A prospective study on lung toxicity in patients treated with gemcitabine and carboplatin: clinical, radiological and functional assessment.

BACKGROUND: Small series and retrospective studies have suggested that treatment with gemcitabine may be associated with pulmonary toxicity. However, a prospective evaluation of cancer patients treated with gemcitabine-based chemotherapy without neoplastic involvement of the thorax and without administration of radiotherapy has not been performed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: To investigate this issue, 41 consecutive patients receiving gemcitabine and carboplatin underwent prospective evaluation of lung function, which included pulmonary symptoms, pulmonary function tests, arterial blood gases and radiographic studies. Assessment was performed before and after completion of chemotherapy in all patients. Patients with a substantial decline in diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO), defined as a drop of > or = 20%, were reassessed 2 months later. RESULTS: After chemotherapy, there were no significant changes in forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), FEV1/FVC ratio, alveolar volume or total lung capacity. In contrast, there was a significant decline in DLCO (73 +/- 22 versus 67 +/- 24% predicted; P = 0.017) and in carbon monoxide transfer coefficient (KCO) (89 +/- 24 versus 80 +/- 24% predicted; P = 0.004). Arterial blood gases did not change following treatment. Ten of the 41 patients (24%) exhibited a substantial decline in DLCO, which, however, recovered within 2 months (DLCO at baseline, immediately after therapy and at 2 months after completion of treatment, 84 +/- 14, 58 +/- 16 and 77 +/- 17% predicted, respectively; P < 0.001; baseline DLCO versus DLCO at 2 months, P > 0.05). Four of the 41 patients (10%) experienced dyspnea, which was self-limiting, with the exception of one patient who developed interstitial lung fibrosis. Among the various risk factors examined, older age, female gender and lower baseline DLCO were associated with more profound changes in DLCO post-treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective analysis showed that the combination of gemcitabine and carboplatin induces a significant, but reversible, decrease in diffusion capacity, which is mostly asymptomatic. Thus, this regimen is safe as regards clinically significant lung toxicity.

Aged↗

PubMed2004

Paclitaxel and epirubicin versus paclitaxel and carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced breast cancer: a phase III study conducted by the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group.

BACKGROUND: To compare survival between patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC) treated with epirubicin/paclitaxel (Taxol) or paclitaxel/carboplatin (Cp) chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 1999 to April 2002, 327 eligible patients with ABC were randomized to receive either paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) in a 3-h infusion followed by epirubicin (EPI) 80 mg/m(2) (group A) or paclitaxel, as in group A, followed by Cp at an AUC of 6 mg x min/ml (group B) every 3 weeks for six cycles. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 23.5 months, median survival was not significantly different between the two groups (22.4 months versus 27.8 months, P=0.25), whereas median time to treatment failure was significantly longer in patients treated with paclitaxel/Cp (8.1 months in group A versus 10.8 months in group B, P=0.04). Both regimens were well tolerated. In total, 39 patients (24%) in group A and 46 (29%) in group B suffered at least one severe side-effect. Quality-of-life assessment and cost analysis did not reveal any significant differences between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that the paclitaxel/Cp combination is an effective therapeutic alternative for patients with ABC in which anthracycline administration has the potential of being harmful.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Adjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with advanced bladder cancer: a study by the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group.

PURPOSE: Radical cystectomy represents the treatment of choice for muscle infiltrative bladder carcinoma. Adjuvant chemotherapy has been used to improve outcome after cystectomy. We report results in a prospective cohort of patients at high risk for relapse who were treated with the combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin as adjuvant treatment following cystectomy for muscle invasive bladder cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 92 patients with extravesical tumor extension (pT 3b or greater) or lymph node involvement (N+) were treated with 4 cycles of paclitaxel at 175 mg/m and carboplatin (area under the curve 5 according to the Calvert formula) every 3 weeks following radical cystectomy. Patients were followed every 6 months thereafter. RESULTS: Median followup was 36.6 months. Chemotherapy was well tolerated with 62% of patients receiving 100% of the expected chemotherapy doses without delays. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was reported in 19% of patients, while neutropenic fever was reported in 7%. Five-year overall, cause specific and disease-free survival was 28.9% (95% CI 14.8 to 43.0), 36.6% (95% CI 24.4 to 49.7) and 29% (95% CI 16.3 to 42.4), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin is feasible and could be used as adjuvant treatment for high risk bladder carcinoma. Its true value should be assessed in prospective, randomized trials.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Docetaxel and cisplatin with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) versus MVAC with G-CSF in advanced urothelial carcinoma: a multicenter, randomized, phase III study from the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group.

PURPOSE: The combination of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC) represents the standard regimen for inoperable or metastatic urothelial cancer, but its toxicity is significant. We previously reported a 52% response rate (RR) using a docetaxel and cisplatin (DC) combination. The toxicity of this regimen compared favorably with that reported for MVAC. We thus designed a randomized phase III trial to compare DC with MVAC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with inoperable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma; adequate bone marrow, renal, liver, and cardiac function; and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status < or = 2 were randomly assigned to receive MVAC at standard doses or docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks. All patients received prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support. RESULT: Two hundred twenty patients were randomly assigned (MVAC, 109 patients; DC, 111 patients). Treatment with MVAC resulted in superior RR (54.2% v 37.4%; P =.017), median time to progression (TTP; 9.4 v 6.1 months; P =.003) and median survival (14.2 v 9.3 months; P =.026). After adjusting for prognostic factors, difference in TTP remained significant (hazard ratio [HR], 1.61; P =.005), whereas survival difference was nonsignificant at the 5% level (HR, 1.31; P =.089). MVAC caused more frequent grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (35.4% v 19.2%; P =.006), thrombocytopenia (5.7% v 0.9%; P =.046), and neutropenic sepsis (11.6% v 3.8%; P =.001). Toxicity of MVAC was considerably lower than that previously reported for MVAC administered without G-CSF. CONCLUSION: MVAC is more effective than DC in advanced urothelial cancer. G-CSF-supported MVAC is well tolerated and could be used instead of classic MVAC as first-line treatment in advanced urothelial carcinoma.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

The combination of estramustine and mitoxantrone in hormone-refractory prostate cancer: a phase II feasibility study conducted by the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group.

OBJECTIVES: To consider the safety profile and therapeutic value of the combination of estramustine and mitoxantrone in a bimonthly schedule to treat hormone-refractory prostate cancer. The survival of patients with prostate cancer who relapse after androgen ablation is limited and the therapeutic options are restricted. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with relapse after previous treatment were included in the study; however, 3 patients who refused to start treatment were not included in the analysis, leaving 26 eligible patients. The median age was 64 years (range 44 to 82), the World Health Organization performance status ranged from 1 to 3, and the mean prostate-specific antigen level was 103 ng/mL (range 1 to 620). The Gleason score ranged from 2 to 9. The patients received a total of 208 therapeutic cycles (mean 8, range 3 to 24). Every cycle consisted of oral estramustine 140 mg, 3 times a day continuously, and intravenous mitoxantrone 20 mg (total dose). The regimen was repeated every 2 weeks. RESULTS: Twenty-seven percent of patients with measurable soft-tissue disease demonstrated an objective response, which included one complete and six partial responses. Thirteen patients (50%) had a greater than 50% reduction in serum prostate-specific antigen level. The median duration of response was 9.2 months, and the median survival for all patients was 15 months. The most common side effects were neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of estramustine and mitoxantrone is safe, well tolerated, and relatively active in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer. More patients are needed to partake in Phase III studies to establish the survival benefit that this combination may offer.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed2003

Prognostic significance of CA 125, CD44, and epithelial membrane antigen in renal cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: To study retrospectively CA 125, CD44, and epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) expression in renal cell carcinoma and their role as prognostic factors. CD44 is a cell adhesion molecule, and CA 125 and EMA are tumor-associated antigens used in the diagnosis and monitoring of the outcome and response to treatment of various human malignancies. Their expression and prognostic significance after resection of renal cell carcinoma have not been adequately studied. METHODS: The expression of CA 125, CD44, and EMA were studied immunohistochemically and correlated with the outcome of 92 patients who underwent nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. RESULTS: Positive staining was found for CA 125 in 28 patients (30.43%), CD44 in 48 patients (52.17%), and EMA in 74 patients (80.43%). CA 125 expression was increased in those with higher T stage (P <0.001) and histologic grade (P = 0.007). An inverse relationship was found between EMA expression and grade (P <0.001). The median follow-up was 41.5 months (range 30 to 65). The median survival for positive and negative patients was 34.6 versus 54.3 months for CA 125 (P = 0.0044), 48.3 versus 51.5 months for CD44 (P = 0.4677), and 53.2 versus 34 months for EMA (P = 0.0046). Multivariate analysis showed that CA 125 and EMA expression were independent prognostic factors (P = 0.021 and P = 0.018, respectively). Subgroup analysis showed that CA 125 expression predicted a significantly higher probability of death (28.6% versus 8%, P =0.0413) in patients with T1 or T2 tumors. CONCLUSIONS: CA 125 and EMA appear to be useful prognostic markers in renal cell carcinoma. Additional studies are needed to determine the value of these markers as a means of selection for postoperative management.

Aged↗

PubMed2003

Treatment of intermediate and advanced stage Hodgkin's disease with modified baseline BEACOPP regimen: a Hellenic Co-operative Oncology Group Study.

The purpose of this prospective phase II trial was to investigate the safety and efficacy of a modified baseline BEACOPP (bleomycin, etoposide, adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone) regimen in the treatment of intermediate and advanced stage Hodgkin's disease (HD). From October 1997 to November 2001, 51 consecutive, previously untreated patients with stage IIA (bulky), IIB, III, and IV disease were treated with a modified baseline BEACOPP regimen with the etoposide administered i.v. on day 1 and orally at a dose of 100 mg/m2, on days 2 and 3. Each patient was scheduled to receive eight courses of BEACOPP with consolidation radiotherapy to bulky (> or =5 cm) or residual disease. There were 25 males and 26 females with a median age of 32 yr (16-65 yr); 80.3% of the patients had nodular sclerosis HD, 41% had bulky disease (> or =5 cm), 10 were in stage IIA (bulky > or =10 cm), 15 in stage IIB, 19 in stage III, and seven in stage IV. Thirty-seven patients (72.5%) achieved a complete response and 17.6% partial response. No significant difference in overall response rate was observed between patients with: (i) 0-2 vs. > or =3 negative prognostic factors, (ii) in stage II vs. stages III/IV, LDH level, and bulky disease. With a median follow up period of 39.5 months, actuarial 3-yr survival rate is 82% and time to progression rate 72.5%. Treatment with this combination was well tolerated. Grades 3 and 4 leukopenia and neutropenia occured in 26% and 28% of the patients, respectively, whereas in 16.3% of the patients infection was observed. Support with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was given to 59% of the patients. No case of secondary MDS/leukemia has been observed. The results of the present study demonstrate that the modified baseline BEACOPP regimen with radiotherapy used in our patients was well tolerated and effective therapy for intermediate and advanced stage HD. Further follow up time is required to evaluate long-term toxicity.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2003

Treatment of Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia with single-agent thalidomide or with the combination of clarithromycin, thalidomide and dexamethasone.

To evaluate the activity of thalidomide in Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (WM), 20 patients were treated on a dose schedule that escalated from 200 mg/d to 600 mg/d. On an intention-to-treat basis, five (25%) patients achieved a partial response, which was noted within 3 months of treatment. Adverse effects were common and prevented dose escalation of thalidomide in 75% of patients and led to premature discontinuation of treatment in 35%. We subsequently evaluated the oral combination of clarithromycin (500 mg twice per day), low-dose thalidomide (200 mg once daily), and dexamethasone (40 mg once per week). Our preliminary analysis on 12 previously treated patients indicate activity of this regimen in WM: three patients achieved a partial response and two patients demonstrated monoclonal protein reduction of greater than 25%. This combination was associated with a variety of side effects due not only to thalidomide, but also to corticosteroids and to clarithromycin. Our preliminary data indicate that this combination may be a useful salvage regimen for some patients with heavily pretreated macroglobulinemia.

Angiogenesis Inhibitors↗

PubMed2003

Bone marrow angiogenesis and progression in multiple myeloma: clinical significance and therapeutic approach.

It is now well established that solid tumors depend on angiogenesis. Promoters and inhibitors of angiogenesis are in balance and antiangiogenic strategies aim at repressing the angiogenic process, thus retarding solid tumor progression. Recent data suggest the importance of angiogenesis in hematologic malignancies and several studies reveal an increased angiogenesis in active multiple myeloma. Angiogenesis seems to be a prominent feature of MM progression, and seems to be correlated with the prognosis and the resistance of MM to chemotherapy. Numerous cell populations and cytokines are involved in angiogenesis in multiple myeloma and antiangiogenic therapy with thalidomide is effective in patients with refractory or relapsed disease. The combination of thalidomide and of other immunomodulatory agents with other therapeutic regimens could lead to more effective management of patients with multiple myeloma.

Angiogenesis Inhibitors↗

PubMed2003

Detection of malignant bone marrow involvement with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) in detecting bone marrow involvement in cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 50 consecutive patients with histologically confirmed malignant dissemination to the bone marrow, using dMRI of the lumbosacral spine. Time-signal intensity curves were generated from regions of interest (ROIs) obtained from areas of obvious bone marrow disease (group B). In 16 patients from group B with focal disease, ROIs were also placed on areas with apparently normal bone marrow on static magnetic resonance images (group C). Twenty-two patients with no history of malignancy were used as a control group (group A). Wash-in (WIN) and wash-out (WOUT) rates, time to peak (TTPK), time to maximum slope (TMSP) values and WIN/TMSP ratios were calculated for each patient. Mean values for the three groups were compared statistically. Six patients from group B had follow-up dMRI after chemotherapy: four patients achieved a clinical partial response and two had resistant disease. RESULTS: A significant difference was found between groups A and B for all values. Between groups A and C, in spite of the similar static MRI appearance, all values were significantly different. Between groups B and C, a significant difference was found for WIN, WOUT rates and WIN/TMSP ratio. Follow-up dMRI data analysis correlated well with clinical staging. CONCLUSIONS: dMRI can distinguish normal from malignant bone marrow. It may identify malignant bone marrow infiltration in patients with negative static MRI and serve as both a diagnostic and prognostic tool for patients with bone marrow malignancies.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Treatment of pancreatic cancer with a combination of irinotecan (CPT-11) and gemcitabine: a multicenter phase II study by the Greek Cooperative Group for Pancreatic Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine (GEM) and irinotecan (CPT-11) is evaluated in previously untreated patients with inoperable or metastatic pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 1999 to July 2001, 60 patients with pancreatic cancer (85% stage IV) were enrolled in a two-step extended phase II trial. Patients were treated with gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8) and CPT-11 (300 mg/m2 on day 8) in cycles of 3 weeks. No prophylactic use of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) was initially planned. RESULTS: In an intention-to-treat analysis one (1.7%) complete and 14 (23.3%) partial responses were achieved [objective response rate (ORR) 24.7%; 95% confidence interval 14.04% to 35.96%]. Twenty-two (36.7%) and 23 (38.3%) patients had stable and progressive disease, respectively. The median duration of response was 5 months, the median time to tumor progression (TTP) was 7 months and the median overall survival 7 months. One-year survival was 22.5%. Pain improvement and asthenia during treatment were observed in 45% and 43% of patients, respectively; weight gain occurred in 19.5% of patients. Grade 3 anemia occurred in three (5%) patients who required transfusion of six packed red blood cell (RBC) units. Ten (16.7%) additional patients with grade 2 anemia were treated with recombinant erythropoietin. Grade 3 thrombocytopenia occurred in seven (11.7%) patients and grades 3 and 4 neutropenia in 27 (45%). Ten patients developed febrile neutropenia, two of whom died due to sepsis. Prophylactic use of rhG-CSF was eventually required in 93 (28.3%) of 329 administered cycles. Other toxicities were mild. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of gemcitabine and irinotecan is an active chemotherapy regimen against pancreatic cancer with a 25% ORR. Toxicity was acceptable for the great majority of patients but with a high percentage of hematopoietic growth factor administration.

Aged↗

PubMed2003

Prospective randomized comparison of vincristine, doxorubicin and dexamethasone (VAD) administered as intravenous bolus injection and VAD with liposomal doxorubicin as first-line treatment in multiple myeloma.

BACKGROUND: The combination of vincristine and doxorubicin administered as a continuous infusion via an indwelling catheter together with intermittent high-dose dexamethasone (VAD) is an effective primary treatment for patients with symptomatic multiple myeloma. In order to avoid the need for an indwelling catheter, which imposes logistic problems for outpatient administration, several phase II studies have explored the feasibility and efficacy of VAD-like outpatient regimens. We designed a prospective randomized study to compare the objective response rates of two VAD-like outpatient regimens as primary treatment for symptomatic patients with multiple myeloma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were entered in a randomized study regardless of age, performance status and renal function. One hundred and twenty-seven patients received VAD bolus, which consisted of vincristine 0.4 mg i.v., doxorubicin 9 mg/m(2) i.v. and dexamethasone 40 mg p.o. daily for four consecutive days and 132 patients received VAD doxil, which consisted of vincristine 2 mg i.v. and liposomal doxorubicin 40 mg/m(2) i.v. on day 1 and dexamethasone 40 mg p.o. daily for 4 days. The two regimens were administered every 28 days for four courses and in courses 1 and 3, in both arms, dexamethasone was also given on days 9-12 and 17-20. RESULTS: An objective response was documented in 61.4% and 61.3% of patients treated with VAD bolus and VAD doxil, respectively. Hematological and non-hematological toxicities were mild or moderate and equally distributed between the two treatment arms with the exception of alopecia, which was more common after VAD bolus, and of palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, which was more common after VAD doxil. CONCLUSIONS: Our multicenter trial, which included an unselected patient population, indicated that both VAD bolus and VAD doxil can be administered to outpatients and can provide an equal opportunity of rapid response in many patients with multiple myeloma.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Phase II study of docetaxel-vinorelbine in platinum-resistant, paclitaxel-pretreated ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND: This multicenter, prospective phase II study evaluated the safety and efficacy of the combination of docetaxel and vinorelbine in patients with platinum-resistant, paclitaxel-pretreated recurrent ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Treatment consisted of vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) as a 20-min i.v. infusion (days 1 and 8), and docetaxel 70 mg/m(2), as a 1-h i.v. infusion (day 8). Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support was administered prophylactically on days 12-16. Treatment was repeated every 21 days. RESULTS: Forty-six patients were enrolled. The median number of previous chemotherapeutic regimens was one (range 1-3) with a median treatment-free interval of 4.3 months. Four chemotherapy cycles per patient were administered. Almost 75% of the planned doses for both drugs were given. Forty-one patients are evaluable for response. Three patients (6.5% of all patients; 7.3% of evaluable patients) achieved complete response and eight (17.4% and 19.5%, respectively) a partial response to chemotherapy, leading to overall response rates of 23.9% and 26.8%, respectively. Another 34.8% (39.0%) had stable disease. At a median follow-up of 30 months, the median disease-free survival was 13 months, relapse-free survival was 5 months, time to progression was 4.5 months, and overall survival was 9.3 months. Severe toxicities included leukopenia (31%), neutropenia (35%) and febrile neutropenia (20%). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of docetaxel/vinorelbine is an effective regimen with manageable toxicity for the treatment of platinum-resistant, paclitaxel-pretreated ovarian cancer.

Adult↗