Biomedical subjects

M A Fuss

Publications and source records attributed to M A Fuss.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1998

Measuring and evaluating hospital restructuring efforts. Eighteen-month follow-up and extension to critical care, Part 1.

Increasingly, hospital restructuring is viewed with skepticism because of a lack of systematic and rigorous evaluation of its impact on quality of care. This first article in a two-part series describes comprehensive evaluation of the effects of hospital restructuring on patient satisfaction, nurse satisfaction, costs of care, and clinical quality on four medical-surgical units at a large tertiary hospital. In addition, early application of the model to critical care is described. A quasiexperimental pre- and post-design combined with concurrent control units for selected measures was the overall strategy. The authors conclude that comprehensive restructuring of hospital-based care can take place in a manner that preserves multiple dimensions of quality while decreasing costs. This only can be ascertained, however, through rigorous and systematic measurement and evaluation. Part 2 will detail application and evaluation of the restructuring model in the critical care environment.

Critical Care↗

PubMed1998

Measuring and evaluating hospital restructuring efforts: 18-month follow-up and extension to critical care, Part 2.

Critical care has enjoyed unobstructed growth during the past two decades; however, to remain viable, process and role changes are pivotal to ensuring continued quality, cost-effective, and efficient care. In this article, the second in a two-part series, the authors describe restructuring efforts, inclusive of their measurement and evaluation strategies, within four critical care units at an acute care, tertiary institution. Special emphasis is placed on the process, the authors' observations, and lessons learned to date. Part 1 (September 1998) presented evaluation data of the effects of hospital restructuring on patient and nurse satisfaction, costs of care, and clinical quality in four medical-surgical units.

Critical Care↗

PubMed1998

Measuring critical care redesign: impact on satisfaction and quality.

This report describes restructuring on four critical care units at an acute, tertiary care hospital in South-east Pennsylvania. Utilizing a Patient Centered Care conceptual framework that had been successfully applied in the medical-surgical areas, restructuring involved three main areas: revamping of work processes, inclusive of redesigned staff roles; environmental and facility changes; and enhancement of telecommunication and information systems. Preliminary analyses six months post redesign revealed improvements and maintenance in four outcomes areas--satisfaction, quality and efficiency, and costs of care.

Critical Care↗

PubMed1998

Multicenter study of noninvasive monitoring systems as alternatives to invasive monitoring of acutely ill emergency patients.

BACKGROUND: Recent reports showed lack of effectiveness of pulmonary artery catheterization in critically ill medical patients and relatively late-stage surgical patients with organ failure. Since invasive monitoring requires critical care environments, the early hemodynamic patterns may have been missed. Ideally, early noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring systems, if reliable, could be used as the "front end" of invasive monitoring to supply more complete descriptions of circulatory pathophysiology. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the accuracy and reliability of noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring consisting of a new bioimpedance method for estimating cardiac output combined with arterial BP, pulse oximetry, and transcutaneous PO2 and PCO2; we compared this system of noninvasive monitoring with simultaneous invasive measurements to evaluate circulatory deficiencies in acutely ill patients shortly after hospital admission where invasive monitoring was not readily available. We also preliminarily explored early differences in temporal hemodynamic patterns of survivors and nonsurvivors. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective comparison of simultaneous invasive and noninvasive measurements of circulatory function with retrospective analysis of data in university-run county hospitals, university hospitals and affiliated teaching hospitals, and a community private hospital. PATIENTS: We studied 680 patients, including 139 severely injured or hemorrhaging patients in the emergency department (ED), 129 medical (nontrauma) patients on admission to the ED, 274 high-risk surgical patients intraoperatively, and 138 patients recently admitted to the ICU. RESULTS: A new noninvasive impedance device provided cardiac output estimations under conditions in which invasive thermodilution measurements were not usually applied. There were 2,192 simultaneous bioimpedance and thermodilution cardiac index measurements; the correlation coefficient, r = 0.85, r2 = 0.73, p < 0.001. The precision and bias was -0.124+/-0.75 L/min/m2. Both invasive and noninvasive monitoring systems provide similar information and identified episodes of hypotension, low cardiac index, arterial hemoglobin desaturation, low transcutaneous O2, high transcutaneous CO2, and low oxygen consumption before and during initial resuscitation. The limitations of noninvasive systems were described. CONCLUSIONS: Noninvasive monitoring systems gave continuous displays of physiologic data that provided information allowing early recognition of low flow and poor tissue perfusion that were more pronounced in the nonsurvivors. Noninvasive systems may be acceptable alternatives where invasive monitoring is not available.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

A fever workup guideline.

Fever is a common clinical problem in patients hospitalized with trauma. When an infection is suspected, it is important to identify the source of fever and begin definitive care before more severe morbidity occurs. An undirected approach with "pan cultures" has resulted in a high rate of negative cultures obtained and has increased patient care costs. By developing and using an evidence-based fever workup guideline, this institution was able to evaluate and identify infections and reduce costs.

Algorithms↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Clinical management protocols: the bedside answer to clinical practice guidelines.

TOPIC: Clinical Management Protocols for trauma patients. PURPOSE: The goals and process for developing and implementing Clinical Management Protocols are presented. Protocol development and the differences between clinical practice guidelines, critical pathways, and clinical management protocols are discussed. SOURCES: Published literature, experience, and clinical expertise. CONCLUSIONS: Utilizing annotated algorithms, the protocols are designed for and driven by patient care based on patient need and require the collaboration of experts and trauma team members.

Algorithms↗