PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

M A Graceffo

Publications and source records attributed to M A Graceffo.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Cardiac transplant rejection is associated with a decrease in the high-frequency components of the high-resolution, signal-averaged electrocardiogram.

To evaluate the utility of signal-averaged electrocardiograms (SA-ECGs) in assessing cardiac transplant rejection, SA-ECGs and endomyocardial biopsy specimens in 20 transplant recipients were prospectively obtained. Total root mean square amplitude of the QRS (RMSt) from 70 to 250 Hz was decreased in the 12 SA-ECGs accompanying rejection compared with the 65 SA-ECGs without rejection (26.0 +/- 13.2 mcV vs 37.7 +/- 13.6 mcV, p < 0.01), and the RMSt, terminal 40 msec root mean square voltage (RMS40), and the filtered QRS duration (QRSd) were all decreased for SA-ECGs with rejection compared with those without rejection when evaluated from 125 to 250 Hz (12.3 +/- 7.0 mcV vs 17.5 +/- 6.3 mcV, 10.4 +/- 5.1 mcV vs 14.9 +/- 7.4 mcV, and 78.8 +/- 6.0 msec vs 85.1 +/- 9.5 msec, respectively, p < 0.05 for all comparisons). These results demonstrate a relative loss of high-frequency SA-ECG components in patients undergoing cardiac transplant rejection and suggest that the SA-ECG may be useful in the noninvasive evaluation of cardiac transplant rejection.

Biopsy

The time course and relation of positive signal-averaged electrocardiograms by time-domain and spectral temporal mapping analyses after infarction.

We evaluated the time course of development of positive signal-averaged electrocardiograms (SA-ECGs) by time-domain and Spectral Temporal Mapping (STM) analyses after myocardial infarction in 88 patients without bundle branch block. The incidence of positive SA-ECGs by time-domain analysis peaked at 4 to 8 weeks postinfarction whereas the peak incidence by STM analysis varied from 4 days to 4 to 10 months postinfarction. Positive time-domain SA-ECGs demonstrated a significantly reduced factor of normality (NF) compared with negative time-domain SA-ECGs by X, Z, or vector STM analyses, but marked overlap was present for the standard deviations of positive and negative SA-ECGs in all STM leads. Chi square analysis demonstrated a significant correlation only between X-lead STM analysis and time-domain analysis; however, the two methods were markedly discordant. Although there is a statistically significant relation between time-domain and STM analyses of SA-ECGs, the two analyses are not clinically interchangeable.

Adult