PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M A Kastenbaum

Publications and source records attributed to M A Kastenbaum.

12 recordsLinked to original sources

Sister chromatid exchange data and Gram-Charlier series.

Bowman et al. [K.O. Bowman, M.A. Kastenbaum, L.R. Shenton, Fitting multi-parameter distributions to SCE data, Mutat. Res., 358 (1996) 15-24.] showed how discrete Pearson and discrete Johnson translation-system distributions may be fitted to sister chromatid exchange (SCE) data presented by Bender et al. [M.A. Bender, R.J. Pearston, R.C. Leonard, B.E. Pyatt, P.C. Gooch, On the distribution of spontaneous SCE in human peripheral blood lymphocytes, Mutat. Res., 281 (1992) 227-232.]. When their performances were measured by the chi-squared test of goodness of fit, these distributions proved to be only moderately better alternatives to the poorly fitting Poisson, binomial, and negative binomial distributions. In this paper, we extend our search for better characterizations of the SCE data by calling upon the Gram-Charlier type B approximation of the negative binomial distribution. We introduce an innovative extension of methods described in a little-known paper by Aitken and Gonin [A.C. Aitken, H.T. Gonin, On fourfold sampling with and without replacement, Proc. R. Soc. Edinburgh, 55 (1934) 114-125.], and show how this leads to fits of the SCE data that, in general, are within acceptable levels of probability. Moreover, we show how a theorem by Cramér [H. Cramér, Mathematical Methods of Statistics, Princeton Univ. Press, 1946.], relating to the scale factor m2/m'1 and its asymptotic distribution, may be used to discriminate between smokers and nonsmokers of the same gender.

Biometry↗

Fitting multi-parameter distributions to sister chromatid exchange data.

Bender et al. (1992) presented the number of sister chromatid exchanges (SCE) in 50 peripheral blood lymphocytes from each of 393 normal human subjects. In that study of 19650 cells, the number of SCE per cell ranged from 0 to 32. We examine the resulting frequency distributions, and show how they may be fitted, by the method of moments, to discrete Pearson-type and Johnson translation system distributions.

Data Interpretation, Statistical↗

Chromosome 16: a specific chromosomal pathway for the origin of human malignancy?

Minkler, Gofman and Tandy (1970a, b) have recently reported data on the karyotype constitutions of human tissue culture cell lines and human tumours, as gathered by a semi-automatic chromosome analysis system. The data appears to show a relationship between the relative number of "number 16" chromosomes and malignancy. We have tested the ability of the "cutting line" approach they used to correctly classify chromosomes from a sample of 723 cells from 100 normal subjects. The cutting line scheme gave very different results from those of an experienced cytogeneticist. The method also failed to give correct average numbers of chromosomes per class. We are thus led to question the conclusions reached by Minkler et al. It appears possible that their relatively consistent finding of an excess of "number 16" chromosomes in their largely hyperploid material may be an artefact of their classification scheme, arising from measurement normalization problems, rather than a reflection of a real excess of "number 16" or even of "number 16-like" chromosomes.

Cell Line↗