PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M A Primus

Publications and source records attributed to M A Primus.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

Parental perceptions of hearing loss classification in children.

Hearing loss classification scales are commonly used to explain audiometric findings to the parents of children with hearing loss. These scales, however, have little or no scientific basis. In this study, filtered auditory recordings were used to simulate three levels of childhood hearing loss, as defined by the commonly used terms--slight, mild, and moderate. Parents, after listening to each simulation, were asked to provide their impressions. Results demonstrated that: parents defined each simulated loss with terminology representing substantially greater magnitude than the commonly used terms; parents anticipated significantly greater difficulty (p < .05) for each of nine hearing-related tasks when hearing loss was defined by the simulations rather than the classification terms; and parents selected more aggressive management procedures in response to the simulations than to the classification terms. In an additional task, parents estimated degree of simulated hearing loss with percentage values, indicating about 40% greater hearing loss for the three levels of loss compared to values produced by the conventional American Academy of Otolaryngology-American Council of Otolaryngology (1979) percentage formula. The findings indicate that standard methods of classifying hearing loss in audiologic and medical clinics may undermine parents' understanding of their child's hearing loss, causing them to underestimate substantially the magnitude of the loss.

Adult↗

The role of localization in visual reinforcement audiometry.

The response task employed in visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) has been characterized both as a localization response and, alternatively, as a pure operant conditioning behavior independent of localization. This study examined the role of localization in VRA conditioning and threshold procedures by varying the localization information provided to normal infants. Results indicate (a) that the VRA response is not contingent on localization but (b) that performance may be significantly influenced by localization. The findings suggest that any variable that alters proper localization cues, including equipment arrangement or impaired auditory function, may degrade response performance.

Audiometry, Speech↗

Operant response in infants as a function of time interval following signal onset.

This study investigated the hypothesis that estimates of infant auditory threshold are lowered by extending the duration of individual test trials such that infants have more time to detect and respond to the acoustic signal. Forty 8- and 12-month-old infants were evaluated with an operant procedure to determine response latencies at four near-threshold levels. Resulting data were used to estimate the effect of trial duration on threshold by calculating the response performance that occurred at several intervals following signal onset. Findings indicate that most detection responses occurred in the initial 4 sec of the test trial, and use of an 8-sec trial interval yielded little gain in performance. The data reflect an insignificant shift (< 5.0 dB) in threshold as a function of extended trial intervals.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

Repeated infant thresholds in operant and nonoperant audiometric procedures.

This study examined test-retest reliability of infant auditory thresholds in a single evaluation session. Eight- to 11-month-olds were assessed in both operant and nonoperant audiometric procedures. Operant testing produced an average of 8.5 thresholds. Mean threshold level did not shift significantly over the course of the operant session, although some individual threshold functions varied from the group trend. Nonoperant assessment yielded two or more measures of threshold for only a portion of the subject group. The pattern of repeated measures for this subgroup showed a significant upward shift in threshold level.

Audiometry↗

Infant thresholds with enhanced attention to the signal in visual reinforcement audiometry.

Experimental data show a discrepancy between adult auditory thresholds and best estimates of infant thresholds. The source of the discrepancy has not been determined. Attentional differences between infants and adults and procedural differences to accommodate infant attentional behavior may account at least in part for the discrepancy. A standard operant procedure, Visual Reinforcement Audiometry (VRA), was modified to enhance infant attention to impending auditory signals. Results on 16 infants evaluated with conventional VRA and modified VRA revealed an average 5.5 dB improvement in threshold with the modified technique. Correction for adult performance in similar tasks indicated a 3.3 dB attentional effect between infant and adult thresholds. The shift in threshold reflects on the adequacy of VRA as a threshold procedure.

Adult↗

Response and reinforcement in operant audiometry.

Variable success in audiometric assessment of young children with operant conditioning indicates the need for systematic examination of commonly employed techniques. The current study investigated response and reinforcement features of two operant discrimination paradigms with normal 17-month-old children. Findings indicated more responses prior to the onset of habituation when the response task was based on complex central processing skills (localization and coordination of auditory/visual space) versus simple detection. Use of animation in toy reinforcers resulted in more than a twofold increase in the number of subject responses. Results showed no significant difference in response conditioning rate or consistency for the response tasks and forms of reinforcement examined.

Audiometry↗

Response strength of young children in operant audiometry.

An operant conditioning discrimination paradigm was evaluated in terms of relationships between response behavior of young children and two stimulus components of the paradigm, the discriminative stimulus (DS) and the reinforcing stimulus (RS). Experiment I measured response performance in normal 1-year-old subjects as a function of differences in intensity and/or complexity among three DSs. Results showed no significant differences in conditioning rate, habituation, or consistency of the conditioned response relative to variable properties of the DS. Experiment II examined response performance of normal 2-year-old children as a function of two modifications in the RS, reinforcement schedule and reinforcement novelty. Subjects reinforced on a variable-ratio schedule of intermittent reinforcement and subjects reinforced on a 100% schedule demonstrated equivalent response habituation and consistency. In the second part of the experiment, subjects receiving novel RSs showed significantly greater response recovery than subjects reinforced with familiar RSs. Comparison of normal 1- and 2-year-old children revealed similar rates of conditioning and response consistency. However, 2-year-olds habituated more rapidly than 1-year-olds.

Acoustic Stimulation↗